Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Other subjects

DD had accident at school - are they at fault?

52 replies

MABS · 29/09/2003 20:53

I'll keep this as brief as I can, but i'd really appreciate any opinions on this.

Last week my dd (8) bumped into another child at school at the corner of the playground. She 'bounced' off the other girl and hit her face on a metal railing. She then skidded, grazed her leg on the playground surface - finally ending up slicing her knee TO THE BONE on the steel baseplate (about 1cm high) of a large strut supporting an outside walkway on the first floor of the school.

She was rushed to hospital where she needed a lot of stitches to the leg, which will scar. The cut on her face is not large but is very prominent and caused 2 haemotoma (sp) which had to be drained. The whole thing has been very distressing for her and today we were told that she will, very prob, need surgeery on the facial scar when she's in her teens.

I'm now wondering if the school are at fault in any way. A friend said she thought those baseplates had to sunk below ground or 'sort of' tarmacced in. The school building is fairly old BTW. I suppose i'd just like to hear any thoughts on the matter and how you'd deal with it if it were your child.

The school have been very concerned about her ,particularly as she'd only been there 10 days! She is now getting rather down and i don't seem to be able to lift her up again. Thanks for listening.

OP posts:
ks · 04/11/2003 09:24

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

jampot · 04/11/2003 14:19

I fully agree. I think anyone considering legal action needs to weigh up pros and cons accordingly. As you say it really depends what you want out of it. Quite often an apology and more consideration for safety are paramount. I was just offering to recommend a couple of firms if that was the particular course of action MABS wanted to take for her dd. However, I think you are confusing solicitors with claims companies. The difference is a solicitor will fight your case and if you don't win you don't pay anything, if you do win, the losing insurance company pays your costs. Lawyers take nothing from your compensation - they don't need to. Claims companies quite often charge a huge premium for insurance to cover legal costs (not recoverable from insurance co) and deductions can be made from compensation awarded. My advice: if you need legal advice, always go to a lawyer.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread