Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Nurseries

Find nursery advice from other Mumsnetters on our Nursery forum. For more guidance on early years development, sign up for Mumsnet Ages & Stages emails.

Child ‘hit’ by nursery staff

129 replies

Supermathsdoc · 23/12/2024 15:13

A bit long but I’ll try to summarise:

2 weeks ago I was called by my 20m old child’s nursery to say there had been an incident. My child went to scratch another and a nursery worker hit her on the bum to stop her. There was no mark. My child was fine afterwards. I obviously didn’t see this but another nursery work did and called it out.

There was an investigation, while this took place the person was removed from the room. Nursery staff (who I think were junior) told me she wouldn’t be back and that she didn’t seem aware that she’d done anything wrong. They obviously couldn’t tell me who it was, butdid say it was a permanent (but new) member of staff rather than an unknown agency worker.

The investigation is now complete, the nursery have done all the right things, they’ve told ofsted, there’s been a disciplinary hearing etc and the person is now back in the room with some extra support.

I feel super uncomfortable with this. We have had no other issues with this nursery and my child seems happy there. I guess what im asking is what others would do? Would you disrupt your child and find a new nursery just in case? Is it just one of those things? I’m not sure what the best thing to do is.

OP posts:
Willwetalk · 23/12/2024 16:36

ViaRia01 · 23/12/2024 16:30

I think I’d want to understand the full outcome of the investigation ie why the decision was made to keep the nursery worker on. Was it determined that the actual incident was a tap/ nudge rather than a hit and so no further action required? Is the worker to receive some sort of training? Is it deemed acceptable to hit children now? What actually happened and then you can determine whether you’re comfortable with the outcome.

You sound a bit too sensible and not nearly hysterical/vengeful for this thread.

Spirallingdownwards · 23/12/2024 16:36

MumblesParty · 23/12/2024 16:31

I wouldn’t be so sure. It’s incredibly hard to sack people, the risks of litigation are huge, and the costs would destroy a small business. I’m a GP and we hired a new receptionist. In her first week she stole a prescription for temazepam and tried to present it to a local chemist. The pharmacist was suspicious, refused the prescription, and told us. We informed the police, she was cautioned. We took legal advice and were told that if we sacked her she could sue us for unfair dismissal. Luckily she was embarrassed about it so she resigned, but we still had to pay her a months notice!

So I wouldn’t judge the nursery on the basis of them keeping this staff member on.

Whoever gave you that legal advice is entirely wrong. (a) It would be gross misconduct and a summary dismissal would be fine and (b) she hadn't been employed for 2 years to have any protected rights so could have just been given notice. I would make sure you employ a better solicitor going forward. Indeed if they charged you for this advice I would contact them, raise a complaint and ask for your money back.

lifeonmars100 · 23/12/2024 16:36

MILLYmo0se · 23/12/2024 15:23

I'm not in the UK but does a DBS check show incidences like this? Or just criminal convictions

Nursery staff should be having enhanced DBS checks which means that everything will be disclosed not just convictions including "spent" ones, but cautions. An enhanced check would also show if the person has ever come to the attention of the police even it it did not result in a charge and prosecution. It is known as "intelligence". An enhanced level check people are checked against every address they have lived at with the relevant police force. However, if someone has never come to the attention of the police the check comes back as "contains no information".

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 23/12/2024 16:36

I think they handled it very well actually so no I wouldn’t pull my child out.

SleeplessInWherever · 23/12/2024 16:37

The LADO will have issued a judgement off the back of the investigation that took place, and then the internal outcome (disciplinary, further training, dismissal etc) is the responsibility of the employer.

I’m assuming it didn’t meet harm threshold, as in there wasn’t evidence that there was intention to cause harm. If it had have, she wouldn’t be there and a referral to the DBS would likely have been made.

I’m in no way downplaying it, and how awful it must be, but procedurally- it sounds like they’ve done the right thing.

Jellycatspyjamas · 23/12/2024 16:38

It absolutely is when it is a member of staff I'm a nursery/school/professional setting

In which case I’d be reporting to the police, though I expect the worker would claim reasonable chastisement, which is the usual defence for assaulting a child. I’m in Scotland where it would have been reported as a matter of course because the law is very clear.

Sometimeswinning · 23/12/2024 16:40

Supermathsdoc · 23/12/2024 16:30

The conclusion of the investigation was that she was ‘low risk’ to others in the room of supervised.

I’d like to think the wording was just rubbish and not assume she’s high risk if lone working. Risk assessment language is pretty much like that.

sprigatito · 23/12/2024 16:44

Jellycatspyjamas · 23/12/2024 16:38

It absolutely is when it is a member of staff I'm a nursery/school/professional setting

In which case I’d be reporting to the police, though I expect the worker would claim reasonable chastisement, which is the usual defence for assaulting a child. I’m in Scotland where it would have been reported as a matter of course because the law is very clear.

I think the "reasonable chastisement" cop-out is only for parents. The sooner it is finally done away with the better.

I have to admit I would be out for blood over this. That worker assaulted a child. There's no mitigation, no retraining, no additional supervision that would be enough to justify her staying in the job after that. There have to be some absolute red lines where child safeguarding is concerned, and she crossed one. I wouldn't let this go.

Manxexile · 23/12/2024 16:47

Spirallingdownwards · 23/12/2024 16:36

Whoever gave you that legal advice is entirely wrong. (a) It would be gross misconduct and a summary dismissal would be fine and (b) she hadn't been employed for 2 years to have any protected rights so could have just been given notice. I would make sure you employ a better solicitor going forward. Indeed if they charged you for this advice I would contact them, raise a complaint and ask for your money back.

Edited

I was going to make exactly the same comment as you.

Either @MumblesParty has made the whole thing up or whoever gave them "legal advice" was talking out of their arse.

It's amazingly easy to sack people who've just started working for you - they don't even need to have stolen prescriptions!

If they did pay for that legal advice they need a refund.

Ihatelittlefriendsusan · 23/12/2024 16:50

Jellycatspyjamas · 23/12/2024 16:38

It absolutely is when it is a member of staff I'm a nursery/school/professional setting

In which case I’d be reporting to the police, though I expect the worker would claim reasonable chastisement, which is the usual defence for assaulting a child. I’m in Scotland where it would have been reported as a matter of course because the law is very clear.

Reasonable chastisement is only a defence if it is your own child. In a professional setting there is absolutely no physical chastisement allowed ever.

Jellycatspyjamas · 23/12/2024 16:54

I’d have taken it to the police in that case, there should have been a joint local authority/police investigation. Apologies for being unclear, I’m in Scotland so not fully familiar with English smacking law.

Supermathsdoc · 23/12/2024 16:56

This has been incredibly helpful and I’m grateful for all the responses.

Im going to make some effort to try and understand the role of the LADO vs. Decisions taken by the nursery. If the nursery have decided to give this a pass, and the reasons for this aren’t good enough, then I think we will need to find a new nursery.

If you were at my nursery, would you want to be told about this? I think I’ll give the nursery the opportunity to communicate with parents first, and if they don’t then I’ll have to have another think.

OP posts:
WrongWrongWrongAgain · 23/12/2024 16:56

For me it would depend on what I believed happened. There is a huge world of difference between a gentle tap on a padded nappy bottom which didn't hurt or distress the child at all just got their attention, and somebody hitting a child as a punishment. If the nursery worker who reported it had a dislike of the one who did it, I can see how it could all get blown out of proportion. Equally, if it was a strike to hurt I would feel very differently.

I do think that the nursery is probably very safe from smacking right now, as the member of staff has been punished and retrained, and all members of staff will be on high alert and very aware of correct behaviour, both for themselves and what to do if they witness an incident.

Ihatelittlefriendsusan · 23/12/2024 16:59

Supermathsdoc · 23/12/2024 16:56

This has been incredibly helpful and I’m grateful for all the responses.

Im going to make some effort to try and understand the role of the LADO vs. Decisions taken by the nursery. If the nursery have decided to give this a pass, and the reasons for this aren’t good enough, then I think we will need to find a new nursery.

If you were at my nursery, would you want to be told about this? I think I’ll give the nursery the opportunity to communicate with parents first, and if they don’t then I’ll have to have another think.

Be very careful what you day and to whom or they could go after you for damaging their reputation.

I would be tsking it to the police and allow them to do their investigations and on the meantime move your child

By staying you are saying you are happy with the process and outcome they have followed.

BeLilacSloth · 23/12/2024 17:00

Change Nurseries and report to the owner, manager and ofsted again, explaining that you are still unsatisfied with the outcome. This is completely unacceptable and the member of staff needs to be sacked.

InsiderBetty · 23/12/2024 17:04

I would remove my child, tell all the other parents at the nursery what has happened and leave a google review warning future parents too. People need to know what's happened so they can take this into account when deciding where they place their children.

3WildOnes · 23/12/2024 17:08

I can't believe she wasn't sacked for gross misconduct! I would absolutely be informing the police- I think it's unlikely she would be prosecuted but at least it would hopefully show up on future DBS checks. I would inform the nursery that I was very unhappy that she hadn't been let go and that I was informing the police. I would also let all of the other parents know via the WhatsApp group.

TheCheeryLeader · 23/12/2024 17:08

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Sugargliderwombat · 23/12/2024 17:10

I couldn't trust that this nursery worker wouldn't now resent my child and start taking anger out on her sneakily. Unlikely, but I wouldn't be able to trust it.

Sleepysleepycoffeecoffee · 23/12/2024 17:13

Supermathsdoc · 23/12/2024 16:30

The conclusion of the investigation was that she was ‘low risk’ to others in the room of supervised.

Have they explained how they will ensure the staff member is always supervised? Or what level of risk they are if left unsupervised and how they plan on managing this?

Imjustlikeyou2 · 23/12/2024 17:13

I know this isn’t going to be a popular opinion but I think this is all a bit OTT. (I’m not sniping at you op I would be concerned to if it was my child but some of the replies are a bit much imo.) Your daughter wasn’t hurt, the other staff member flagged it up, the investigation was done. No the nursery worker shouldn’t have done it (she must be stupid to, frankly) but what matters is your daughter. Do you actually think she was at all impacted by this action? Do you really believe the same staff member would do so much as look at her the wrong way after all this? I would feel reassured by the nurseries open communication & as she is settled so keep her there. You’re not a mother sending her child into a setting with an ‘abuser’ as some might like to make out…

Grumpyoldthing · 23/12/2024 17:17

I’m so very very surprised that she’s kept her job . It’s very basic first rule really…… especially a tiny toddler, this isn’t something that anyone one who works with children should even consider

it almost feels like the nursery is worried about something if they fire her . Is she from a different culture maybe ? And they are worried about her causing issues ? A family member?

im sure its been done , but make sure ofsted knows. And yes make sure the parents know. Sharing a link to a public report such as an ofsted complaint would mean that you weren’t sharing anything that wasn’t in the public domain.

im truly baffled that she has kept her job that’s the bit that’s blowing my mind

I agree its good that they have been so open with you and not tried to cover it up.

I wouldn’t be very quick to leave the setting if you are otherwise happy with them , but I would expect the worker to be dismissed and parents to be made aware of ofsted complaints

WhoopsNow · 23/12/2024 17:18

I'd call the police and report it as an assault.

Rocksaltrita · 23/12/2024 17:18

That’s gross misconduct and should have resulted in her dismissal. I wouldn’t go back.

Grumpyoldthing · 23/12/2024 17:19

Also saying she’s in a different room is all well and good , but staff members are moved in and out of rooms all the time to cover breaks , sickness , holidays, busy days the list goes on