I have to agree, those comments do come across as bitter. It’s just the sort of view that an easily lead to discrimination and bullying.
The sad thing is that those remarks about 'glass elevators' and male colleagues being 'worshipped' and 'fawned over' are horribly familiar. It’s precisely the same embarrassing language that was used against women in my last job, which was in a highly male-oriented workplace.
There’s naturally going to be a certain amount of fuss about a colleague who is seen as 'a man in a woman’s world'. And that’s likely to be lauded as a positive thing if it is redressing and historic imbalance. Anything that means the nursery/school environment is more a reflection of the real world is probably going to be lauded.
Has anyone stopped to ask themselves whether these male teachers/nursery workers actually like being the centre of so much unwanted extra attention? I expect they would much rather be seen as 'teachers' or 'nursery staff' rather than 'male teachers/nursery staff', in much the same way that my gap has every right to be called a 'doctor' and not the cringe-inducing title of 'lady doctor'.
It’s not directly analogous, but I’m reminded of something Tanni Grey Thompson said about disability sport only really breaking down barriers when paralympians started to be seen as 'athletes' and not as 'disabled athletes' or in any way brave or needing special attention.
Sadly, I can’t see that happening until we’re much closer to a 50-50 female/male workforce, rather than the current 98-2. Perhaps some of the prejudice and resistance could be because some teachers/nursery staff see males as a threat to 'their' female closed shop environments?