Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Mumsnet webchats

WEBCHAT GUIDELINES: 1. One question per member plus one follow-up. 2. Keep your question brief. 3. Don't moan if your question doesn't get answered. 4. Do be civil/polite. 5. If one topic or question threatens to overwhelm the webchat, MNHQ will usually ask for people to stop repeating the same question or point.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Live webchat with Fiona Millar, Tuesday 3rd March, 1-2pm

286 replies

RachelMumsnet · 25/02/2009 21:10

Fiona Millar will be visiting us at Mumsnet Towers for a live webchat on Tuesday 3rd March between 1 and 2pm. Her book The Secret World of the Working Mother: Juggling Work, Kids and Sanity will be out on Thursday 5th March. Fiona is a well-known journalist, educational campaigner and mother of three. If you can't join us on Tuesday, post your questions in advance on this thread.

OP posts:
Pruners · 01/03/2009 10:24

Message withdrawn

morningpaper · 01/03/2009 10:28

but tbh I think it is a useful default position to reject non-experts' work (esp if in the mass media) rather than to blithely accept it

But how does that further the cause, when the people are rejecting are the people who are being listened to because they are gifted communicators?

I think I find this particularly painful when you are talking about educational campaigning and working to further education - and directing this sort of statement to a website full of mothers, who care passionately about those issues, but 99% of whom are by definition non-experts. I think it is one field where - almost by definition - listening to 'non-academics' is essential (much like mental health actually). Surely the opinions of people at the grassroots cannot just be swept aside so easily?

morningpaper · 01/03/2009 10:29

(sorry I may have caught Boffinmum's paranoia)

moondog · 01/03/2009 10:36

Morningpaper

'But how does that further the cause, when the people are rejecting are the people who are being listened to because they are gifted communicators'

I'm staggered by this comment.To praphrase, gosh, even if people are talknig crap they do it soooo well that it must be worth something.
If that is the case, then hey, let's bring on Hitler, Mussolini, Jim Jones and all the other nutter oraters.

Anyway,I'm off for a day of advanced level juggling (Sunday school, visit to view my neighbours' pigs,swimming, birthday party, ironing and preparing for work tomorrow) so I look forward to catching up with this one later on.

theghostofrosaparks · 01/03/2009 11:15
theghostofrosaparks · 01/03/2009 11:19

Oh - and I am one of mp's 'haven't posted for ages' - this thread has pulled me out of retirement as the repartee is just too damn fine to ignore, on both sides.

Fwiw, I agree with Moondog, btw.

morningpaper · 01/03/2009 11:30

moondog's position seems awfully popular so I want to tease out why exactly. Her points seem to be:

  1. Webchats shouldn't be stickied.
  1. There should be a blanket ban on author webchats if people are promoting books (even if those people might be interesting and some MNers might actually be GLAD of the opportunity to ask them questions).
  1. High-profile campaigners shouldn't be listened to if they fail the test of academic rigour (I'm not sure how Millar fits into this exactly, I'd be awfully glad if someone could perhaps list her credentials and then say how they have fallen short of the required level before which her opinions are worth listening to?)
Boco · 01/03/2009 12:32

But participating in the webchats are free. It's quite insulting to mners to assume that anyone who might be interested in what she has to say is also absorbing uncritically and being sold to.

The idea that she can't be worth engaging with if she is privileged is just inverted snobbery. I am in a very low income family, I don't limit my reading accordingly. I have yet to see a webchat where the guest's opinions are just unquestioningly absorbed by the majority, that's what makes them interesting - it sparks debate and shared experience. Or it should. Or could.

lucy678 · 01/03/2009 12:37

I love Boco.

dustbuster · 01/03/2009 13:06

PMSL at this thread. I assumed it would be full of MNer swooning at the thought of Alastair Campbell. I have a huge crush on him since reading the diaries.

I say hats off to you Fiona, not just for snagging such a sexy bastard, but for staying true to your principles while all those about you were losing theirs.

PollyFilla · 01/03/2009 13:13

I can't speak for anyone else about why they agree with Moondog but it just isn't relevant to me to hear how someone with a six figure income 'juggles' working and children. It's just not that hard given a decent income. That's not 'juggling', that's delegating with style (to paraphrase Buzz Lightyear)

Winehouse · 01/03/2009 13:49

I think this debate has got out of hand, really. Fiona Millar is not pretending to be a human rights activist or a blue-stocking, is she?

She's just a woman who has written a book which she wants to publicise - are you all going to another launch party?

UnquietDad · 01/03/2009 14:38

Are we still posting questions for Fiona here?

I have a couple.

  1. Do you think the whole "choice" debate has got out of hand, and that private schools being discussed in the media as if they were just another "choice" out of many equally available to all parents is deliberately misleading and skewing the debate? (Given that an extra £10-15K a year really isn't a realistic issue for the vast majority of normal people.)
  1. Should all children go to their local catchment school? Would this improve things or just exacerbate the selection-by-mortgage problem?
donnie · 01/03/2009 17:41

I still want to know how many lengths per day she manages. Other than that I am not remotely interested in anything she has to say.

Pruners · 01/03/2009 18:53

Message withdrawn

dontgive2shoites4daftpricks · 01/03/2009 19:11

I havent just cropped up from anywhere.

dontgive2shoites4daftpricks · 01/03/2009 19:18

Winehouse - I dont think anyone (except Morningpaper) had suggested that FM was anything other than a journo who is selling a book. If I thought we'd get a good chat that didnt have "well if you read my new book" or "I've covered this in my new book" smattered across each reply, I'd not mind so much. If I thought her experiences were based on the average Mumsnetter's lifestyle, I'd be interested.

I just dont think this live webchat will appeal to many, or bring anything to most of us. (Except potential book sales for FM). It seems like she has few fans tbh (except for Morningpaper, who compares her with Rosa Parks , and anyone who fancies AC).

MiTochondrialEve · 01/03/2009 19:42

Is it fair on your kids not to do that, if you have the money though, Betadad?

MiTochondrialEve · 01/03/2009 19:44

Oh, has this kicked off? I must read it when DS is in bed.

Boco · 01/03/2009 19:46

How is FM going to manage to be so irrelevant and of no interest to mnetters while simultaneously boosting her books sales? I would be interested then in her hypnotic powers - and will be wearing my tinfoil hat for the webchat!

I don't know if her book will be relevant to me, I don't know much about it, but am maybe the general discussion could be useful and interesting.

MiTochondrialEve · 01/03/2009 19:48

Just questioning Moondogs post of Fri 27-Feb-09 00:14:47 and the use of "we"...hmm

MiTochondrialEve · 01/03/2009 19:50

Some interesting female intra-sexual competition on here and attempted derogation of rivals - Go Fiona!

Starbear · 01/03/2009 20:06

MiTochondrialEve I thought you only had eyes for Ms H Harman?.
Oh! and by the way why did someone extrapolate I was speaking from a personal point of view re shift worker down a mine, rather than a professional point of view of parents I have come in contact with through work!

mrsturnip · 01/03/2009 20:23

Actually I think Moondog has a point. And its one that authors should be prepared to answer.

I have 3 kids aged 9, 7 and 4. I work full time but my eldest son is severely autistic (non verbal and with severe learning difficulties). There is no out of school or school holiday childcare available for him, so despite being unable to receive carer's allowance I have to stop work at school bus time and make up the remaining hours once he's in bed. During school holidays I struggle enormously to find the time to work. My life isn't about juggling really - juggling involves having some choices.

So my question is:

Is there any point at all in me buying this book or would I be better off spending the £12.99 on a nice bottle of wine to share with my husband?

MiTochondrialEve · 01/03/2009 20:59

No Star, I am a fan of many great pro-active women who veer from the dark side of cynicism!