@fuzzpig
Brilliant!
I was diagnosed with ASC last week. I've hated myself for a long time for struggling with things that most people seem to take in their stride, and I am really trying now to see my difference in a positive light.
I'm waiting for the book at the library but there's a queue! :o
I'm hopefully going to be giving a talk next year about the benefits of thinking differently, and I'd like to talk about people on the spectrum who have changed the world!
So my question (which I guess may be answered in the book, so apologies if so as I've not read it yet!) is, when we talk about people throughout history with autism, how 'safe' is it to speculate over whether a particular person like Mozart or Tesla actually had autism when the diagnosis would not have been made at that time?
I don't mean that in an accusatory way of course :o but rather that from my own perspective, I felt very awkward about describing myself as having an ASC when I didn't have it diagnosed officially - even though I really knew I had, I just felt I couldn't say it for sure until a specialist had confirmed it.
Thanks :) and thanks also for writing this book - I am very excited to read it and I really think it will help me come to terms with my diagnosis.
Hey fuzzpig! I'm really glad you're coming to see your differences in a positive light. This is not blind optimism or making light of the profound challenges that autistic people and those who love them face every day, but it's very important that we don't view people on the spectrum through a relentlessly pathologizing lens while failing to appreciate their characteristic strengths. Appreciating strengths in autism often unlocks the key to success, whether in the classroom or in the workplace, and it certainly helps people on the spectrum and their families live happier, more confident lives.
You question the safety of speculating about the neurostatus of people like Mozart and Tesla. I try to be very, very, very conservative about this retrodiagnosing, because there's a danger about framing autism as a mere eccentricity, while losing track of the fact that it's a quite challenging disability for many people. If Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates "have autism," why would anyone need help and support? That's not good, and it trivializes the struggles that families and autistic people themselves go through.
At the same time, I do talk about a couple of people in my book who likely would have been diagnosable if the diagnosis had been available to adults, namely the 18th Century scientist Henry Cavendish, the 20th Century quantum physicist Paul Dirac, and the 20th Century ham radio entrepreneur Hugo Gernsback. NOTE: In each case, I didn't do the retrodiagnosing. Cavendish was retrodiagnosed by the late neurologist Oliver Sacks; Dirac by his very cautious biographer, Graham Farmelo, author of a great book called "The Strangest Man"; and Gernsback by his biographer, Gary Westfahl. In these cases, I felt I was on firm ground in speculating that these people were on the spectrum.