I, unfortunately, have had four years experience of Judges within the family court system.
I would say that we have had one exceptional judge of outstanding intellect with amazing recall of the facts of the numerous bundles in the case and another who employed common sense with a small dose of humanity.
As for the rest, well I still harbour murderous thoughts towards whoever it was decided that indecisive, bullying, shouting old men who will not even let you put your side to the court because you have committed the sin of being unable to afford representation are suitable people to pass judgement and decide the future of vulnerable children. They are meant to be the safety net for the child, not just lazily rubber stamp anything CAFCASS says.
The first Judge I referred to challenged CAFCASS regularly and their local Manager told me their workers were afraid of him and accordingly produced more balanced, diligently worked upon reports. Despite this fear, she said he was a great loss to Family justice when he was moved from the area.
I have little faith in the secret family courts and you must be aware when setting off on the path of litigant in person, that the partner without residence will get contact in all but the most extreme circumstances.
All children have a right to contact with both their parents, but when a child insists that person has hurt them and they are told by the Judge that their word cannot be taken as the truth because they are too young is a disgrace to the family justice system.
Sorry for this rant, I just wanted to be as horribly frank as I could be.