Um- doesn't anyone else experience totally exhausted 6-7 year olds practically falling out of school after an 8 week term- the flip side of weeks and weeks off in long holidays?
Actually, I'm surprised this hasn't turned into an SAHM/working mum discussion. I'd love it if the DCs got 6 weeks off (OK, so I'm 'state'!) IF I could ALSO get 6 weeks off. The things we could do! The broadening of their horizons we could facilitate! The character building nature of 'I'm bored' we could explore! ... I was amused at the Canadian example about huge long holidays- complete with packing the DCs off to what we might call 'Summer Camp' albeit day not boarding. GREAT if your DC LOVES team this, team that, go, go go! But not so fab for the DC who likes quiet, one on one time. And isn't it interesting how some of us champion long holidays, having cited the 'just being kids' argument, then choose to send the DCs off to 'learn' this, be 'tutored' in that. Yet DAMN the tyranny of the desk! Also let's not overlook how flippin' EXPENSIVE organised child fun, fun, fun can be! (28 quid per DC per day at SuperCamp, for instance).
AND are the work/play balance needs of a 4 year old the same as those of a 17 year old? For surely both could well find themselves in the current holiday/termtime conundrum we're discussing.
Finally, re holiday companies bumping up the costs: a reasonable point BUT the market is finite (ie there are only a given number of parents seeking holidays through the summer season) therefore the market demand shouldn't be as great IF say there was a fortnight in early June to play with OR August. It'd be a brave company who attempted to 'peak price' hike prices for both AND expected custom. And it is a hell of a hassle if your DCs go to different schools as in different LEAs/ state:private, but it's a factor you consider when you choose to sends DCs to different schools, surely.