Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Barking fire Major incident declared as fire breaks out in block of flats in East London.

61 replies

HelenaDove · 09/06/2019 17:20

www.standard.co.uk/news/london/barking-fire-huge-blaze-breaks-out-at-block-of-flats-in-east-london-a4163006.html

OP posts:
Jux · 10/06/2019 14:30

Bellway directors and their families could perhaps swap homes with residents who are now homeless, until such time as those residents (ex-residents) are rehoused.

Perhaps the idea that their own children would be made to live in a community centre or a B&B, attend a local Barking school etc would help them to build safer homes? Not sure anything else will.

HelenaDove · 10/06/2019 16:23

Witness video and more in this link. Fire spread to 3 to 4 minutes.

twitter.com/rachaelvenables/status/1137980055173423104

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 10/06/2019 16:24

#took 3 to 4 minutes.

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 10/06/2019 16:52

news.sky.com/story/social-housing-residents-second-class-citizens-over-home-repairs-11738733

Social housing residents 'second-class citizens' over home repairs
Homeless charity Shelter says approximately 2.5 million people have had a problem with their homes

More than half of people living in social housing in England have experienced a problem with their home in the past three years, including electrical faults, gas leaks and faulty lifts.

Research by the homeless charity Shelter shows approximately 2.5 million people have had a problem and one in 10 had to report it 10 times before it was dealt with.

Michael Mohid, 70, has lived in the same council flat in southeast London for more than 30 years.

He said the flat has been permanently damaged by four major floods in that time.

"When I had a flood in the downstairs toilet, the council didn't fix it for weeks because it had asbestos panelling," he said

"I had to walk through the flood water every morning, I tried to mop it but couldn't keep up with it."

On another occasion Mr Mohid said the flat was without electricity for three weeks.

"It makes you very stressed," he said.

"The garden has some subsidence so there was a crack in the wall. Every time it rained, water would get in and leave the carpet squelchy. I had to keep on reporting it."

Karen Connelly, 54, lives on the same housing estate and has been campaigning for residents for more than a decade.

She was awarded £4,000 in compensation from Southwark Council after being exposed to asbestos.

She said: "People are at their wits' end. They are scared, anxious and angry and don't feel like they are being listened to.

"The whole complaints procedure for any disrepair is harrowing. Every step of the way we are treated like second-rate citizens.

"We are dealing with faulty electrics, raw sewage and the heating and hot water never works.

Councillor Kieron Williams, cabinet member for housing management and modernisation at Southwark Council, said: "As the landlord of London's largest social housing stock, it is a mammoth task to manage our repairs in a timely way, and successive cuts by central government to council budgets have only made it harder.

"However, we always strive to deliver the very highest standards of service to our tenants and as a council we are proud to have an 89% repair satisfaction rate from our residents.

The research comes almost two years after the Grenfell Tower fire, which exposed the failures of social housing in the UK. There have been calls for tougher regulations to better protect people living in social housing.

Shelter chief executive Polly Neate said: "Tenants were not listened to at Grenfell and they are still not being listened to in social housing up and down the country.

"They are acutely aware of that and it's leading them to fear for their safety, which is hardly surprising given what happened at Grenfell.

"So what we really need is a new regulator that will hear tenants' concerns, and follow them up, and be accountable to tenants themselves."

A spokesperson from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: "No one should be forced to live in unsafe housing and we are working closely with Grenfell United and others to ensure social homes are safe and issues are resolved quickly.

"In our recent Social Housing Green Paper consultation we set out proposals to re-balance the relationship between residents and landlords, to tackle stigma and ensure residents' voices are heard - and we will publish our response before the summer recess

OP posts:
OP posts:
HelenaDove · 10/06/2019 18:07

This wasnt the first time

This is from four years ago......

www.kentonline.co.uk/canterbury/news/fire-ravaged-homes-rebuild-controversy-40225/

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 11/06/2019 00:27

LBC fire expert says the building work at Barking Riverside is completely wrong.

twitter.com/SyeddIslam/status/1138170579125755904

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 11/06/2019 00:29

twitter.com/PeteApps/status/1138001572317868032

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 11/06/2019 01:10
OP posts:
OP posts:
HelenaDove · 11/06/2019 17:12

www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/barking-fire-grenfell-tower-safety-block-of-flats-building-a8952981.html

"She described a similar block nearby as a “mirror image” of the gutted flats, adding: “One of the concerns now with this building is there is a huge temporary heating system outside of one of the entrances and that’s on diesel.”

De Pass Gardens resident Subramaniyan said he and his two children had spent the night a hotel. He told LBC that residents had raised safety concerns about the wooden cladding and faulty sprinkler systems."

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 11/06/2019 19:24

www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/barking-fire-developer-highly-likely-to-strip-cladding-and-remove-balconies-from-block-61869

Barking fire developer ‘highly likely’ to strip cladding and remove balconies from block
News
11/06/193:25 PM
by Jack Simpson

The developer behind the Barking development, which saw 20 properties completely destroyed by a fire on Sunday, is now likely to remove the cladding and balconies from the affected block, it has confirmed

A statement released by developer Bellway, which completed the building in 2012, said: “It is highly likely that we will replace the cladding and balconies in order to allay any concerns residents may have.”

The company said that while the material was compliant with building regulations, it wanted to “act in a positive manner”.

The developer is currently carrying out a survey of the whole of the block and expects to conclude this work at the start of next week.

Yesterday Inside Housing revealed that the material used on the Samuel Garside block was wood-based material ThermoWood with a Class D fire rating.

ThermoWood, according to a brochure by its manufacturer, is wood that has been heated to make it “more stable”. The brochure says that its reaction to fire is rated as Class D

Government guidance requires Class B for the external surfaces of walls on buildings above 18m and limited combustibility, or A2 for insulation. Class D is more combustible than both of these.

It is understood the height of the Samuel Garside building is below the 18m threshold for government regulations – meaning there are no limits placed by the guidance. Balconies are also widely considered exempt.

In addition to the 20 flats that were destroyed, a further 10 properties were damaged. Two people were treated for smoke inhalation at the scene but there were no major injuries.

A Bellway spokesperson said it was continuing to investigate the incident, would be helping Barking & Dagenham Council to secure alternative accommodation for affected residents, and carry out remedial works on damaged apartments.

They added: “We understand that the blaze was contained to the external envelope of the eastern elevation of the building, with initial reports suggesting that it was caused by a barbecue on a resident’s balcony.

“We are relieved that the fire protection measures within the building, which received all regulatory approvals, ensured that occupants were safely evacuated.”

A total of 32 of the 80 properties in the Samuel Garside block belonged to housing association Southern Housing Group. Adriatic Land, which is part of the £1.6bn Long Harbour Ground Rent Fund, bought the head lease of the property from Bellway.

Yesterday mayor of London Sadiq Khan said that he would be speaking to the owners of the Samuel Garside building, Adriatic Land, about the fire to try and push the freeholder to ensure blocks in Barking were made safe

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 12/06/2019 23:23

www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/news/revealed-hundreds-still-face-huge-cladding-bills-despite-government-fund-61784

A survey by the UK Cladding Action Group (UKCAG), shared with the magazine, showed that there were a number of blocks across the country clad in non-ACM where leaseholders still face crippling costs to replace cladding and resolve other fire safety issues.

Last month the government announced that it would create a £200m fund to pay for the removal of dangerous ACM cladding from private residential blocks.

However, of the 17 blocks referenced in response to the survey, exactly half did not have any ACM cladding on their blocks. Instead they have materials in their cladding and insulation that fire services and fire safety experts believe are dangerous and need to be removed. On some of these developments, leaseholders collectively face bills of up to £3m to get the cladding removed.

Natasha Foulkes – a resident at Burton Place in Manchester, which is clad in timber and combustible insulation – said that, as it stands, leaseholders in the block would still have to pay the cladding removal bill. The cost is estimated to be £80,000 for leaseholders that own three-bedroom flats in the development

She added: “While we are pleased the government is doing something, it is not enough, and the fund does not help us in any way.”

The UKCAG survey revealed the national scale of the problem, with responses from blocks in Ipswich, the West Midlands, Manchester, London and Sheffield.

Of the nine ACM-clad blocks referenced in response to the survey, four also have other types of cladding and insulation that need to be removed. One example is the Northpoint building in south London, which has three different types of dangerous cladding, including category three ACM – the same used on Grenfell.

Inside Housing is currently running its End Our Cladding Scandal campaign, which calls on the government to provide funding for the removal of dangerous cladding from private blocks. However, the government has so far been clear that cash will go only to those blocks covered in ACM.

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 13/06/2019 19:22

www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/pms-chief-of-staff-did-not-act-on-multiple-warnings-about-fire-safety-in-months-before-grenfell-new-letters-show-61883

PM’s chief of staff did not act on multiple warnings about fire safety in months before Grenfell, new letters show
News
13/06/197:00 AM
by Peter Apps

Theresa May’s chief of staff was sent multiple, clear warnings to review fire safety rules in the months leading up to Grenfell, but failed to reply to letters or meet with the MPs raising concerns, new documents obtained by Inside Housing reveal

Twitter IH
Prime minister’s chief of staff did not act on multiple warnings about fire safety before Grenfell, new letters show #ukhousing
Twitter IH
Gavin Barwell was sent seven letters warning about fire safety and building regulations in the year building up to Grenfell. He did not act, new letters show #ukhousing

Gavin Barwell, who was housing minister in 2016 and 2017, received seven letters from the group of MPs responsible for scrutinising fire safety rules between September 2016 and May 2017 – with the last landing just 26 days before the fire at Grenfell Tower.

The letters warned of the risk of a deadly fire and called for a promised review of building regulations and fire safety to be carried out to prevent it.

But Mr Barwell sent just three short replies during this period and became so bad at replying that the group resorted to sending their letters by recorded delivery.

Ministers had previously been warned that if a tower block fire occurred “where the matters raised here were found to be contributory to the outcome, then the group would be bound to bring this to others’ attention.

The letters are described as a “smoking gun” by Labour MP David Lammy and come as Inside Housing publishes the results of a major investigation into the failure to act on the coroner’s recommendations from the fatal 2009 Lakanal House fire in time to prevent the 72 deaths at Grenfell Tower.

Inside Housing understands a total of 21 letters calling for change were sent to ministers Eric Pickles, James Wharton, Stephen Williams and Mr Barwell by the group between 2014 and 2017. Mr Barwell was made Theresa May’s chief of staff after losing his seat as an MP in 2017.

BBC Panorama has previously reported these ministers were contacted by the group – but the new documents reveal the extent of the warnings missed.

Listen to an audio version of our investigation here:

The letters particularly push for a review of the requirement that the external surfaces of buildings have a ‘Class 0’ fire safety rating. Grenfell Tower was eventually clad with a material certified to Class 0.

They also called on ministers to reconsider the decision not to make retrofitting sprinklers mandatory for high-rises, given new costing analysis showed it had become much cheaper.

But ministers refused to listen to these warnings, with Mr Wharton at one stage citing the government’s desire to “reduce the burden of red tape” in his refusal to act.

In September 2014, then-minister Stephen Williams responded to a string of letters to tell the group he had “neither seen nor heard anything that would suggest consideration of these specific potential changes is urgent” and said he was “not willing to disrupt the work of this department by asking that these matters be brought forward”.

The group’s chair, Sir David Amess MP, responded on 28 October, writing that he was “at a loss to understand how you had concluded that credible and independent evidence which had life safety implications was not considered to be urgent”.

He added: “As a consequence, the group wishes to point out to you that should a major fire tragedy with loss of life occur between now and 2017 in, for example, a residential care facility or a purpose-built block of flats, where the matters raised here were found to be contributory to the outcome, then the group would be bound to bring this to others’ attention.

Mr Barwell himself was first contacted him on 12 September 2016, with an invite to lunch and note saying that the post-Lakanal review of regulations had still not taken place

Regrettably, we have yet to receive any announcement on this, which is of such importance to the fire and construction sector,” the letter read. It also referred to a death of a pregnant woman in a tower block fire in Essex in May 2016 – which was in Sir David’s constituency.

But Mr Barwell did not reply and also ignored a follow-up letter on 17 October. He finally replied on 14 November, saying a “statement would be made in due course” and declining the invite to lunch.

The group chased him again on 22 November, urging him to make an early statement on the review, but again received no response. They chased again on 20 February expressing “extreme concern” that the minister had not yet written to the residents of the block where the pregnant woman died

He finally replied on 5 April, saying the previous letters had been “lost in transit” and accepting that this was “completely unacceptable”. He finally accepted their offer of a meeting.

The group replied on the 18 April saying: “It is over 11 years since Part B [dealing with fire safety] was last reviewed and I trust that the matters… will now receive your due consideration and early decision to proceed.

“The group firmly believes after being given a similar response by three successive ministers… that it is now the time to listen to what the fire sector is saying and get on with the promised review.”

By this stage, it had resolved to send the letter by recorded delivery.

Mr Barwell finally responded to this letter on 2 May without setting a date for the review, and the group sent its last letter to him on May 19 – just weeks before Grenfell.

The planned meeting was then put off due to the snap election

The group also contacted chancellor Philip Hammond in January and February 2017, calling for consideration of sprinklers in schools and high-rises and making it clear that the promised review of the regulations had not been carried out.

The chancellor instructed them to keep liaising with Mr Barwell.

David Lammy, a Labour MP who lost a friend at Grenfell Tower, said: “These warnings are yet another smoking gun in a man-made, preventable tragedy that took the lives of 72 at Grenfell Tower.

“The national and local government response to repeated warnings about safety in this block and others is characterised by apathy rather than action. Those culpable of gross negligent manslaughter must be held to account.”

Grenfell United, the survivors and bereaved families group, said: “As shocking as these revelations are, they’re not surprising. The evidence was there before the fire that regulations were not fit for purpose, materials were dangerous and testing systems flawed

“What is surprising is the government’s continued resistance to change. No one cared enough then and no one seems to care enough now. Enough with supportive platitudes – we need change now before another Grenfell.”

A spokesperson for the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government said the government “took action” on the coroner’s findings.

The spokesperson said the review of the guidance was “underway but had not been completed” by the time of the Grenfell fire and added that the government still “believes an appropriate level of fire safety can be achieved without the need to retrofit sprinklers”.

A review of Approved Document B, which deals with fire safety is currently under way, with the government saying it will respond to a consultation “in due course”.

Mr Barwell did not respond when Inside Housing contacted him for comment.

OP posts:
OP posts:
HelenaDove · 13/06/2019 20:28

Jack Simpson
@JSimpsonjourno
23m23 minutes ago

Pretty incredible stories coming from the meeting tonight on the Barking fire on Sunday. Alarm on silent. Residents having to rip doors open. And people throwing objects at door to open it. Dozens of people rushing in to save neighbours. Shocking stuff. #barkingfire

OP posts:
beanaseireann · 14/06/2019 09:53

Awful for the residents and preventable. I'd be so angry. Why is it not getting more publicity ?

HelenaDove · 14/06/2019 21:43

Good God,

www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/barking-fire-residents-had-to-break-through-doors-in-desperate-bid-to-escape-flames-61908

Barking fire residents ‘had to break through doors’ in desperate bid to escape flames
News
14/06/192:30 PM
by Jack Simpson

Residents of the Barking block involved in a huge fire last weekend have said they had to break through doors in a desperate bid to escape the rapidly spreading flames

Twitter IH
Barking fire residents “had to break through doors” in desperate bid to escape flames, public meeting hears #ukhousing
Twitter IH
Residents question developer’s claims about wood cladding in public meeting following Barking fire #ukhousing

At a public meeting last night attended by residents and the block’s developer Bellway, one resident described how those near the top of six-storey Samuel Garside House were almost trapped by the fire.

The resident, who lives in a block nearby and entered the building to alert residents about the fire, claimed that the alarm had been on silent at the time of the fire, and that those living inside the block were able to escape only because they were alerted by neighbours.

He told the meeting that some of the building’s magnetic doors had not released, meaning residents had to break them open

Some residents were not aware that there was a fire until… smoke had reached inside the building. At the top of the building it was very, very hot and very, very smoky and people had to break through the magnetic doors to get out because the fire alarm didn’t go off,” he said.

At the meeting:

Residents questioned Bellway’s claim that the timber cladding on the balconies could withstand fire for 30 minutes
The developer suggested that its current plan is to treat wood on other buildings in the development to make them more fire resistant
Residents passed a motion calling for the timber to be fully removed across the site
Bellway said that eight of the damaged homes will take six months to make ready for re-habitation

Residents asked why Bellway believed that the wooden cladding on the outside of the building could take heat and flame for up to 30 minutes despite Sunday’s fire spreading across the building in less than six minutes.

“We have all been told by Bellway that the cladding was not fire retardant and it was protected to take the heat and flame for about 30 minutes. If that is the case, how come after four or five minutes the first fire crew were there and the whole place was an inferno? That’s not 30 minutes, is it?” he said

Ian Gorst, regional chair for London and South East at Bellway, said that while the timber cladding “was not fire rated”, the structure and the fabric of the building in all respects “performed exactly as it was designed to do”.

He said: “Clearly the images which are extremely distressing and the speed with which the fire took across the decorative timber across the balconies is clearly unacceptable and something we need to address.”

Inside Housing revealed on Monday that the wood used on the block was a Class D-rated material called ThermoWood. Government guidance requires Class B for the external surfaces of walls on buildings above 18m and limited combustibility, or A2, for insulation. Class D is more combustible than both of these. Samuel Garside House is below 18m.

Mr Gorst said timber was used because of the timing of the initial design of the block 10 years ago, when “the trend in architecture was to use sustainable and natural products”.

Inside Housing also reported this week that the architect on the development was Sheppard Robson. The firm has so far declined to comment

The comments were made at a meeting last night between residents of Samuel Garside House, developer Bellway, management company RMG, ground rent company HomeGround, and Barking Riverside – the joint venture between L&Q and the Greater London Authority that owns the whole of the Barking Riverside development.

As part of the meeting, Barking Reach Residents’ Association brought forward three resolutions including calls for Bellway to remove cladding from all apartment buildings and houses across the Barking Riverside development.

Mr Gorst said that Bellway intended to remove the cladding from Samuel Garside House, and that it was currently looking at proposals to treat the wood on the houses across the development to provide them with greater fire resistance.

Residents recalled stories from the day of the fire, as well as the impact it has had since Sunday.

Investigations into the cause of the fire are ongoing, and Mr Gorst said that Bellway was carrying out its own review of the building.

Mr Gorst said that as of Monday there were a total of 47 flats that had been fire damaged: 27 suffered no damage inside, 12 suffered minor smoke damage and eight suffered fire damage.

He added that the 27 flats would be ready within four weeks, the 12 with minor damage would be ready in eight weeks, and it would take six months for the eight damaged flats to be fit for habitation.

OP posts:
OP posts:
HelenaDove · 17/06/2019 17:11

www.architectsjournal.co.uk/opinion/two-years-after-grenfell-barking-riverside-fire-raises-familiar-questions/10043144.article

Weekend roundup: Two years after Grenfell, Barking Riverside fire raises familiar questions

15 June, 2019By Simon Aldous

The Grenfell Tower fire, which occurred two years ago this week, was a tragedy made all the more appalling by having been so avoidable, with the tower’s own residents having previously warned about the building’s fire risks.

Thankfully, there were no fatalities or even serious injuries following last Sunday’s fire at flats in Barking Riverside. But fire-safety expert Sam Webb thinks that is less to do with the building than the time of the fire, during the afternoon when many of the residents weren’t at home.

‘If this fire had occurred 12 hours later we would have woken up to a death toll to rival Grenfell,’ he told the AJ.

The fire spread across the timber-clad balconies of the six-storey Samuel Garside House, a mix of private and housing association flats, designed by Sheppard Robson and completed in 2012. Twenty flats were destroyed with a further 10 damaged. Photographs and footage on social media depict a raging blaze that apparently spread in minutes

And according to residents’ association treasurer Venilia Batista Amorim, residents had written to the builder, Mace, and developer Bellway Homes to express concerns about the timber cladding, and were assured that the materials were fire retardant.

However, it has since emerged that the wood-based ThermoWood material used for the cladding had a Class D fire rating, which is not fire retardant. UK timber bodies have since criticised the scheme for not specifying Class B.

The use of the material did not contravene any regulations. But had the building been more than 18m tall – and built this year – neither option would have been permissible, as they would have contravened the revised Building Regulations. These only allow cladding with a Class A fire rating.

Which does raise the question of why the combustible cladding ban has a height exemption. Only last week, regs expert Geoff Wilkinson wrote about this in the AJ, arguing ‘We need a single system, not twin-track ones. Try telling residents of 17m-tall blocks that no change is required.’

All this comes as the Grenfell United campaign group commemorated that tragedy by projecting giant messages on high-rise buildings around the UK, highlighting safety concerns of the blocks’ residents – from dangerous cladding, to a lack of sprinklers and defective fire doors.

All this comes as the Grenfell United campaign group commemorated that tragedy by projecting giant messages on high-rise buildings around the UK, highlighting safety concerns of the blocks’ residents – from dangerous cladding, to a lack of sprinklers and defective fire doors.

While government ministers were adamant that a tragedy like Grenfell could never be allowed to happen again, two years later, a public inquiry into the fire feels as if it has barely got going and more than 300 high rises remain clad in combustible material.

‘Nothing changes except people get promoted and any inquiry can be stretched to infinity,’ commented Webb.

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 19/06/2019 16:16

www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/barking-fire-risk-assessment-identified-significant-risk-from-wooden-cladding-months-before-fire-61966

Barking fire: risk assessment identified ‘significant risk’ from wooden cladding months before fire
News
19/06/193:55 PM
by Jack Simpson

The fire risk assessment of the block of flats in Barking devastated by a huge fire last week identified the wooden balcony cladding as a “significant hazard” that “put residents at risk”, Inside Housing can reveal

Twitter IH
Barking fire: Block manager was warned about ‘significant’ cladding hazard months before the fire #ukhousing

Inside Housing has obtained a copy of the assessment, carried out in January on the Samuel Garside block where dozens of apartments were badly damaged by fire on 9 June.

The assessment said external cladding, wooden joists and deck balconies were a “significant hazard” that could put residents at risk of smoke inhalation and burn injuries.

The assessment, carried out for building manager RMG by assessor Osterna, said: “It is assessed that the wooden decks and joists are over 90mm thick and should have been formed of or treated with fire resistant materials but this could not be confirmed during the assessment.

“If a balcony does catch fire it should be noted that this will accelerate fire spread through either setting the balcony above alight or through entering the flats through open windows and this will put residents and visitors at risk of smoke inhalation and burn injuries.”

The fire damaged 47 flats, including eight flats that will take six months to make habitable. There were no casualties but two people were treated for smoke inhalation.

Osterna recommended that a responsible person check whether cladding materials had been treated.

It also called for the building’s manager to warn residents not to have BBQs on the balconies.

The BBC reported last week that a barbecue “may have been the cause of the fire”. However, an investigation is yet to confirm this.

Last week, Ian Gorst, regional chair for London and South East at the building’s developer Bellway, confirmed at a meeting with residents that the wood used on the block had not been treated and was not fire retardant.

The cladding on the balconies used on the block was ThermoWood, which has a Class D fire rating if not treated to make it more resistant to flame.

Government guidance requires the higher Class B for the external surfaces of walls on buildings above 18m and limited combustibility, but sets no standard for buildings below this height. The Samuel Garside block is understood to be below 18m.

A source close to Bellway said that the company had not received the report before the fire.

Bellway completed the Samuel Garside block and adjoining blocks in 2014. It sold the freehold of the block to property company Adriatic Land, which is ultimately responsible for the fire safety of the building. HomeGround, an Adriatic Land company, is the manager of the block but has contracted RMG for the day-to-day management. RMG is a subsidiary of Places for People.

The assessment also raised concerns about fire safety in other parts of the building, including issues with the compartmentation of the block and the fire alarms used.

It said it found “gaps and holes” in the service cupboards where pipes and cables have been routed, which could allow fire and smoke to spread internally through the building and block escape routes. This, it added, would put residents and visitors at risk of smoke inhalation and burn injuries.

The report did note that remedial work to fix the fire stopping were in progress at the time of the fire.

It added that a fully automatic fire alarm had been fitted within the common parts of the building, which was at odds with a block purpose-built to building regulation standards designed with a high degree of fire compartmentation

It also reported that there were no records of fire alarm tests, emergency escape lighting tests, or maintenance and testing of other fire protection systems.

The overall risk of the block was “medium”, meaning it had normal hazards subject to appropriate controls for the type of occupancy.

The building was given a “tolerable” risk rating, meaning no major additional work was required but there might be some improvements needed.

Last week, residents claimed that the fire alarm for the block had been on silent at the time of the fire and had to pull open some of the building’s magnetic doors.

Inside Housing has also seen a fire risk assessment from Samuel Garside’s adjoining block, Ernest Websdale House, which also includes concerns over the cladding, compartmentation and fire alarms.

In response, a spokesperson for RMG and HomeGround said: "RMG, as the managing agent for Samuel Garside House, commissioned a fire risk assessment for the building in January 2019. All of the actions identified by the risk assessor were followed up and tracked for compliance purposes.

At the time the risk assessment was carried out, remedial works to address certain issues were already being undertaken in the building by Bellway.”

Bellway declined to comment while an investigation into the fire is ongoing.

OP posts:
OP posts:
HelenaDove · 27/06/2019 23:57

www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/wood-cladding-linked-to-barking-fire-identified-on-multiple-housing-association-developments-62001

Wood cladding linked to Barking fire identified on multiple housing association developments
News
24/06/197:00 AM
by Luke Barratt

Housing associations are urgently investigating developments using the same material found covering the Barking block partly destroyed by a fire two weeks ago, as an Inside Housing investigation has discovered 20 developments using the product

Sharelines
Twitter IH
Housing associations are taking urgent action to investigate developments using the same material covering a Barking block partly destroyed by fire #ukhousing
Twitter IH
Inside Housing analysis has discovered 20 blocks clad in the same material as a Barking building partly destroyed by fire, seven of which are high rises #ukhousing

Clarion, L&Q and Peabody have all said they are carrying out work to deal with potential issues arising from ThermoWood, the wooden material used on the balconies and cladding at Samuel Garside House, the site of a fire earlier this month.

The fire damaged 47 flats, including eight that will take six months to make habitable again, with residents forced to flee for their lives

Inside Housing revealed shortly afterwards that the cladding used was ThermoWood, a Class D-rated material.

Following a ban on combustibles on high rises brought in last November, official government guidance does not permit the material to be used on new build blocks over 18m.

It would still have been banned on high rises under previous guidance, unless it was proved safe by evidence from a large scale test or used on balconies.

However, it was and is permitted on buildings below 18m. Samuel Garside House is understood to be under 18m
Inside Housing has used planning documents and developers’ marketing material to build a list of 20 more schemes – mostly in London – using ThermoWood as either cladding or decking for balconies.

This includes a six-storey development in Lewisham which is owned by Clarion and is clad with ThermoWood. Responding to Inside Housing, a spokesperson for the organisation said: “Our residents’ safety is paramount.

“We are working alongside our partners to investigate the issue as a matter of urgency and will carry out any improvement works that are required.”

Seven of the 20 developments identified include at least one high-rise building, of six storeys or more, within the scheme.

One of these was Titanic Quarter in Belfast, a massive development including 474 apartments, with balconies clad in ThermoWood.

A spokesperson for Titanic Quarter said: “Our development - the ARC, Titanic Quarter - has been constructed in compliance with building control and fire safety regulations and received Full Building Control certification. We are aware of the recent fire in Barking and are closely monitoring the outcome of the investigation

Meanwhile, L&Q’s flagship Quebec Quarter development in Canada Water, which includes blocks of up to six storeys but all under 18m, has also been revealed to have ThermoWood present.

An L&Q spokesperson said: “L&Q is compiling a list of blocks which have extensive timber cladding, including but not limited to ThermoWood.” They added that they were undertaking this work in preparation of the latest fire safety advice from experts and said all of its buildings had up to date fire risk assessments.

A source close to Peabody, which owns a 10-storey block in Bow called Merchants Walk with ThermoWood panels, said the association is looking at the whole estate to evaluate the risks.

A spokesperson said the association was reviewing all of its blocks and making improvements where needed, and had acted on a number of blocks. They added: "We continue to replace materials we consider to be higher risk."

The builder Countryside, meanwhile, declined to comment on its Silver Point scheme in Enfield, which at one point is eight storeys high and uses ThermoWood cladding

Inside Housing also identified 13 mid-rise blocks of between three and five storeys using ThermoWood as either cladding or balconies.

It is possible to treat ThermoWood to give it a higher fire rating of Class B. This would mean current building regulations would still forbid it from being used on new high-rise buildings.

However guidance before regulations were changed by the government last November would have permitted it. It is still permitted on buildings built before that period.

None of the organisations contacted by Inside Housing was able to confirm whether or not the ThermoWood used on its scheme had been treated in this way.

Inside Housing has identified the key organisations involved in developing and managing Samuel Garside House:

Developer: Bellway

Architect: Sheppard Robson

Building owner (headlease): Adriatic Land

Freeholder of land: Greater London Authority/L&Q

Management: HomeGround, which appointed RMG (part of Places for People)

Building control: NHBC

Owner of affordable homes (32 of 80): Southern Housing Group

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 02/07/2019 22:07
OP posts:
HelenaDove · 18/07/2019 21:25

twitter.com/TRCdocumentary/status/1151930772904927232

OP posts: