And as usual in these cases, a thread eventually turns into a 'poor dogs' topic.
I remember one similar incident, posted on social media in a news report, when the thread became totally dominated by dog owners, but then dont they always. In this instance by the posting of photos of their 'cute babies'. It went on for hours, with dozens of photos posted, and also the back and forth praising of each other's pets
'...aaawww he's so sweet...heres one with the children...he wouldn't hurt a fly, you can tell...aaawww hes playing with his toys...what a beauty...she's smiling for the camera in that one...he's part of the family...I don't trust people who don't like dogs [cue 100s of likes]...he's so soft and cuddly...his eyes are so full of love...
This was all underneath a news report on the horrific death of a child in an attack by a 'bull' type dog and every photo was of the same type of breed. I remember thinking there isn't even any point in trying to discuss this rationally and that if I tried to, I would probably get swamped by more dog photos or told I didn't know what I was talking about, or even risk getting abuse for saying a dangerous dog should be put down. The insensitivity toward victims, the obsessive pursuit of a dangerous hobby, the 'dogs don't kill people, people do' attitude, the selfish need to cling onto something that is so obviously a danger to not just their own family but to the rest of the community too. It all reminded me of Americans who oppose gun control. The NRA and other gun fanatic groups. You might as well not bother because it won't change anything. It's so disheartening and sad when you get to the point of realising that nothing is going to change, because dog owners and dog groups will not do anything about it. They won't campaign against dangerous dogs and that they want more dogs not less