I was on the uni library site anyway, so I looked up the journal...
I can't get the full text but the abstract says...
"During a median follow-up of 12.6 years, 252 women died. Hazard ratios comparing left-handed women with other women were 1.4 for all-cause mortality (95% confidence interval = 0.9-2.0), 1.7 for total cancer mortality (1.0-2.7), 2.0 for breast cancer mortality (0.8-4.6), 4.6 for colorectal cancer mortality (1.5-14.3), 1.3 mortality from diseases of the circulatory system (0.5-3.3), and 3.7 for cerebrovascular mortality (1.1-12.1), after adjusting for potential confounders (socioeconomic status, age, body mass index, and cigarette smoking status at study recruitment)."
So, they found some evidence that middle aged Dutch women who are left handed are more likely to die from colorectal cancer or stroke. All the others have a confidence interval crossing 1 and, for a hazard ratio, that means that they failed to show that the different death rates are any different to chance variation between the RH and LH groups. With 252 deaths I'm guessing that not many will have been LH, making the numbers quite unstable and difficult to draw firm conclusions from.
So yes, further research on colorectal cancer particularly and also some interest in the stroke rates, but the other reported 'increases' could well be down to chance variation, and based on small-ish numbers. Some scaremongering in the reporting I think
Ends epidimiology spod moment...