And the Conservatives were, when from 1997 our main EU morphing to superstate and UK financial, debt, economic, immigration, social, social services and housing problems got far worse – so too much UKIP ‘Westminster elite’, over the party/policy facts, for obvious reasons.
Re Zero Hours, I say the trade union preference of pay rates over job creation, which is no ‘what come first, the chicken or egg’ conundrum, is a bit extreme as apparently some people WANT them, it suits their industry/life/work-style .
In most of Europe, part of their hiring problem, is that it is tough to ever let go an employee, so companies have to wait until they see a cast iron country/industry recovery before hiring someone – so they can’t take the chance, potential workers don’t get a chance of ANY employment.
Clearly Europe vs Zero Hours are at different ends of the employment scale, so on balance, I’d suggest REFORMS of ZH contracts.
FYI when I looked at this subject a while ago, I found this in depth study which had the overview, conclusions and recommendations – but I have no idea if being looked at as I write.
"Number of Britons on 'zero hours' contracts hits record high"
"Record numbers of British workers are being employed on "zero hours" contracts which keep staff on standby and deny them regular hours, official figures disclose."
www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/jobs/9968124/Number-of-Britons-on-zero-hours-contracts-hits-record-high.html