That is an interesting report.
Especially this bit: 'an independent pathologist said that because of Mr Duggan's injuries it was "very unlikely" - but not impossible - that he would have been able to throw the gun such a distance after he had been shot.'
I too find Witness B's powers of observation to be almost superhuman.
But I suspect he wasn't the only one fibbing yet the jury appeared to forgive police officers for misremembering.
In the history of members of the public vs The Met - Police: quite a few; dead civilians: nil - officers have always been given the benefit of the doubt.
Sometimes very strongly indeed.
It's understandable. It's a difficult job.
There have been cases such Menezes, Mark Saunders, Harry Stanley and those two brothers in Forest Gate, east London, who were shot but thankfully managed to survive during a terrorism raid which turned out to be a bit of a mistake, where I backed the officers.
And then things came out that made me think: hang on a minute.
I resent having my sympathies manipulated. But feeling you've been fooled is nothing to standing over a grave.