Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Social workers slammed for wrongly taking girl into care

71 replies

edam · 17/03/2006 14:55

Thought this story was interesting. Social services took the girl into care without even asking the doctors if there was anything wrong FFS - just took it upon themselves to decide that being in touch with ss and taking your child to the doctor meant the poor mother was deliberately causing her daughter's illness in order to gain attention. Appalling - as the judge said.

Council must pay £500,000 for wrongly taking girl into care

A couple had their family life torn apart when social workers wrongly took their nine-year-old daughter into emergency care without good reason and kept her from her parents for 14 months, a high court judge said yesterday.

Mr Justice McFarlane castigated the social workers for "multiple failings" and criticised the family court magistrates who had granted the emergency order. The costs of the case, payable from public funds, were £500,000, including the parents' legal aid costs of £200,000, which the judge ordered the local council to pay. The judge took the unusual step of making his judgment public after a hearing behind closed doors, although the family, the local authority and the magistrates court are all unnamed.

He laid down guidelines to prevent future miscarriages of justice which are certain to lead social services departments and magistrates courts to re-examine their practices. He said it gave him "absolutely no pleasure to have to record the multiple failings of the local authority in this case".

But to do so was "necessary not only in order to come to a conclusion on the issues in this case, but also in order that lessons may be learned for the future".

He said the girl's mother had sought the help of social services and child health services because her daughter, the couple's only child, was displaying some "modest behavioural difficulties".

Mother and daughter had been referred to the child guidance unit for psychotherapy and the girl had been put on the local child protection register.

The notes of a social services planning meeting read: "No neglect issues. Home and care good. Mother and child have good relationship. Detrimental to move."

But social workers suspected it was a case of Munchausen syndrome by proxy - now called fabricated or induced illness (FII) -a rare form of child abuse in which a mother or carer makes a child ill or fakes illness to get attention. At the end of a case conference on the girl in November 2004, social services received a phone call from a nurse at the local hospital.

They were told that the mother had taken the girl there with stomach pains and was asking to see a doctor after the nurse found nothing wrong. Within hours and without any information from the doctor, social workers were at the magistrates court seeking an emergency protection order allowing the girl to be taken from her parents immediately.

They acted without telling the parents and without seeking any medical opinion to try to confirm their suspicions. The girl had had medical treatment before and no doctor had suggested fabricated illness.

The council's actions were described by the mother's counsel as "outrageous" and "inexcusable" leading, as it did, to "the destruction of this family's ordinary life".

Those descriptions "do not, in my view, overstate the quality of what took place on that day", the judge said. The social services team leader, who had no detailed knowledge of the case, made 13 assertions to the magistrates, of which every one was "misleading or incomplete or wrong".

He ruled that the council had no case to take the girl into care and made her a ward of court "to facilitate the child's return home".

OP posts:
getbakainyourjimjams · 18/03/2006 23:50

I suspect it'll be raw for many years jetsetmum. :(

Childcare books??? FFS. What like Bruno Bettleheim (one my friend's dh had bought her) saying that autism is caused by mothers. As if being a good mother = reading books.

So pleased you had sensible and helpful GP and HV though- at least you know you can trust them to go to without having to worry about accusations.

edam · 19/03/2006 11:24

I think Jetsmum's terrible experience shows exactly what's wrong with social work (and some idiot doctors - was it Roy Meadows who claimed a 10mo wouldn't be able to put anything in their mouth?).

I don't believe that all social workers are dreadful people, of course not. But there is something horribly wrong with the profession. An appalling lack of resources is part of it - highlighted by the Victoria Climbie case where the social worker involved was young and inexperienced and completely unsupported by her superiors. Sadly while she was castigated her bosses are not only still in the profession, they have actually been promoted.

Fads and fashions clearly come into it - MSbP/FII is satanic abuse all over again. The Crucible (the Arthur Miller play) is directly relevant because it shows how mass hysteria over 'bad' people or threats to the community can lead to the most appalling injustice. It was written as an allegory for the McCarthy period in the US. I'm serious about it being included in social work training because it really would make people think about subscribing to the latest theory without properly weighing the evidence.

OP posts:
edam · 19/03/2006 11:27

Btw the social workers I have interviewed (am a journalist who writes about health and social care) all seem to be genuinely caring. And I've interviewed their clients too who agree. I certainly don't believe they are all evil. But I do stand by my belief that there is something very wrong with the system that allows people who are jaded/incompetent /addicted to power to get away with behaviour which is clearly wrong.

OP posts:
chipkid · 19/03/2006 11:29

unfortunatley the rationale is that non-ambulatory babies do not sustain bruising without something happening to them-that is why junior doctors are told to be extremely vigilent about bruising to babies where no explanation for the bruising is given.
In the absence of an accidental explanation for a bruise to a child that cannot move and so hurt themselves-non-accidental injury is flagged.

jetsetmum-what happened to you is my worst nightmare. Thank God you were able to stay with ds1

Kathy1972 · 19/03/2006 11:58

I have had very limited experience of social workers (when my grandparents had dementia) and this was extremely positive - he was a wonderful, caring, guy with a great sense of humour who went to a huge amount of trouble to find a home where they could be together.)
However, the fundamental problems are all too evident. At least one of those Rochdale people is still giving papers at conferences about ritual abuse FFS (see recent issues of Private Eye)!
But it's the police that really scare me - there was a programme about shaken baby syndrome last summer where it was evident that the police involved in one of these cases didn't give a f* about finding out what had happened because they were so sure they already knew. When a paediatrician at the forefront of research in the area said there were good reasons for thinking it may not have been murder they regarded her as obstructive and unhelpful because she was making it harder for them to get a conviction.

jetsetmum · 19/03/2006 13:47

Don't get me wrong I'm not saying SW's & Dr's are evil but some are misguided. You are totally right chipkid the paediatrician in our situation kept banging on about un-explained bruising. At one point I said to her so if I told you I had dropped him there wouldn't be a problem. She agreed & asked me again to tell her what me or my DH had done!!!!!

She was so narrow minded and not interested in exploring all avenues. She had made her mind up we were abusing him & that was it. The SW just took his lead from her - in that a paediatrician should know best. A scary position of power.

ScummyMummy · 19/03/2006 19:39

I think that one of the problems is that distressing parents may sometimes be an inherent part of the child protection process, unfortunately. Jetsetmum's horrible experience seems very much a case in point to me, though the professionals involved don't sound like they handled things very well. But an unexplained bruise on a very young, non mobile baby is, distressingly, sometimes the result of parental abuse and it does need investigating. And sometimes investigations don't throw up any answers and the only thing that child protection workers can do is monitor the situation closely. And no parent is going to like that, are they? I would hate to be thought possibly capable of such a thing, horrified that they didn't believe my side of the story, utterly resentful of workers coming to check up on me and terrified that they would get things wrong and remove my child, just as jetsetmum did. But ultimately, IF lack of evidence means that it is not possible to rule out abuse, then there is a legal duty TO THE CHILD for workers to stay closely involved. What else would you have them do?

Uwila · 20/03/2006 08:41

I think this thread is enough to scare any parent away from SS (and some doctors).

Do you think they'll want to put this information on ID cards? (just kidding... sort of)

Callisto · 20/03/2006 11:22

I have read and heard enough about SS to scare me away before this thread. Surely the more people who know how destructive SS and family courts can be the more chance of changing things for the better? I agree that children need protection, but SS seems to ignore the truely at need in favour of bullying parents who care for their children and take them to the docs or ask for help. I think there is an awful lot of inverse snobbery in SS and far too much political correctness.

Callisto · 20/03/2006 11:22

'truly'

MamaMaiasaura · 20/03/2006 12:55

Sadly I think this is more common that is reported. When I first posted here my son lived with his dad as he was removed from my care when I had PND - Never harmed nor neglected my ds. SS had no understanding of my illness and the women involved told my then dp that i would never recover and he had to choose. Ending up going through years of court. When finally proved my sanity ds lived with exp for too long and I agreed to save him further upset for him to stay there with contact. Thing is ds wasnt happy staying there and lives with me fulltime. Been so for a year and is extremely happy and has reg contact with dad. Thing is me and ex-p sorted it out between us.

Sometimes think i should complain etc against the social worker but so frightened of them.

Uwila · 20/03/2006 12:58

Blimey, Awen. Sad and Angry for you.

Caligula · 20/03/2006 13:04

Get your child to complain when he's older Awen, and they can't touch you.

They use our fear of them to stop being called to account.

Callisto · 20/03/2006 14:49

So sad for you Awen. Can't believe social worker was so ignorant she told your ex you would never get better.

Angeliz · 20/03/2006 14:57

Oh these stories terrify me.
I know they can't always get everything right but how do they seem t o get it SO wrong?
A 2 week old baby with one briuse that the Mother points out may cause concern but then there are other babies horrificaly beaten anfd killed (The worst case i have ever heard was in my area recently and made me cry for days). In that case the family were known to social services and the baby was left to die horriblySad Sad
It is scary scary stuff and tbh, i often worry when i go to A+E that i'll be wrongly accused of something.

Caligula · 20/03/2006 20:20

I agree with you about A&E Angliz. It's a deeply hostile environment to mothers. (Not sure if they have quite such a downer on fathers.)

It is shocking that a SW can be so ignorant about PND. Surely it should be part of their training to learn about this? And I agree with the idea of reverse snobbery going on - if someone was really abusing their baby, why would they take it to A&E with a little bruise? Only a concerned parent would do that, surely? Or of course, one with MSbP, which as we all know is rife among mothers. Pah.

Uwila · 21/03/2006 09:25

So, can someone enlighten me? What kind of training is required to be a SW? Too much power and too little knowledge is certainly a dangerous thing. Is it the case here? Perhaps it should be abit tougher to become a SW?

I don't really know what is required to become a SW. Surely you must have some kinf od Uni degree at the very least.... I hope.

getbakainyourjimjams · 21/03/2006 09:37

You need a social work degree.

Reading this is the problem that there's a lack of common sense? Sure a baby covered in unexplained bruising should be carefulkly monitered (athough for gods sake rule out medical conditions first- anyone remember the child taken away because she had lots of broken bones before it was realised she had brittle bone disease)- but one bruise? To assume that had to be caused maliciously - enough to actually talk about taking the child into care is madness.

School phoned us once about bruising ds1 had (I've since realised to cover themselves). There were 2 bruises on his collar bone- - looked like he'd been held down. It took me a while to work it out but I realised that it was from dh lifting ds1 onto his shoulders. Being autistic once he finds a game he enjpys he wants to do it repeatedly. The weekend before dh had lifted him onto his shoulders probably 60 times a day - at 5 that needed a bit of a yank- and had led to brusing exactly where he held him.

I'm just pleased school- with a practical understanding of autism noticed - and not a SW or hands off paediatrician.

getbakainyourjimjams · 21/03/2006 09:39

oh and I did tell dh he had to stop lifting ds1 up- so he (ds1) was not happy.

Callisto · 21/03/2006 09:43

How awful that a fun game for your son has to be stopped because we are all so terrified of social workers.

getbakainyourjimjams · 21/03/2006 10:39

It was killing dh's back and becoming obsessive so it was good to stop it, but dh was being a bit crap about stopping it.This worry did give him the strength to ignore ds1's screaming and break the obsession.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page