you cannot compare a one night stand to someone who has made a conscious decision to not continue with treatment that might result in a pregnancy. If a woman becomes pregnant, then the embrio has implanted and is beginning to grow. No-one can make that woman go ahead and have a termination, just as no-one can make her go through with a pregnancy if she doesn't wish to have the baby. But in the case of these frozen embrios, the couple in question created embrios so that they could start a family when they reached the point in their lives where they wished to do so. It's the same as someone saying that he wanted to have a child with someone in the future, only in this instance they had to take steps to ensure that that was able to happen. However, between the time that the couple decided that they "would like to have a family in the future" and actually went ahead with the process to achieve a pregnancy, the relationship between them broke down. Had this been a normal situation, the couple would have gone their separate ways and would not have proceeded to have children together, end of. Had this been a situation where the couple were part way through an IVF treatment and had perhaps already had a treatment and still had frozen embrios remaining, they would not have continued to have children together, the embrios would have been destroyed. The only one thing that makes this situation different is the fact that if Natallie Evans does not have these embrios put back, she will not be able to have a child that is biologically her's. But that does not, imo, mean that her partner should become a father just because if he refuses then she won't be able to have her own children. It's all very well saying that he doesn't have to take financial responsibility etc, but maybe he doesn't want the emotional responsibility of being a father, maybe, and we don't know what goes on behind closed doors, but maybe he just doesn't want this particular woman to be a mother to his children. After all, if you split with an ex wouldn't you say there were reasons why you'd split and you wouldnt want to have any more children with them?
I think now that Natallie Evans should seriously question what she wants. Does she want to have a child that is her's? or does she want to be a mother? Because in reality the two are different. Even if she is unable to have a child that is biologically her's, she could, in the future, have a child with any new partner if she were to use doner eggs, if the desire to be pregnant was that great, that is an avenue that could be pursued. I would imagine that it's likely that the quality of the embrios she currently has in storage probably is diminishing by the day, after all they are nearly 5 years old now, chances are that even if she was able to win her last court battle, the treatment to implant them might not be successful anyway.
If she really thinks that she deserves to be a mum, I think she should let thig go and seak to pursue other avenues to achieve parenthood.