Animation - I am sorry, but you're clearly sticking your head in the sand when you suggest making some policy that would affect everyone worldwide, from the standpoint of "this is what I think is right".
The filtering argument is not a distraction, and almost anywhere you look (read that Guardian article) you will time and time again see comments that it isn't possible or practical to do the type of filtering which has been proposed.
Exactly what UAE does, I don't know, but for the UK, with strong ties to both Europe and North America, where many of the "freedom of speech" arguments are taken further than here and therefore include the filming of porn, then without the UK effectively cutting ourself off from the rest of the world's internet connections (not sensible economically, at the very least) there'd be no means to do the level of restriction you seem to wish for. Frankly, I'd expect to see Hell freeze over before someone changes the internet such that porn, drugs, violence, gambling, and so many other categories of site are blocked by the ISP.
When I took a further look at the filtering offered by Netintelligence for schools, the number of tick boxes (for blocking Social Networking, etc, etc, categories of sites) was massive. OK, I don't gamble, as it happens, nor use Facebook or Twitter or many other 'social media' sites, and I can see why, in a school environment, restrictions such as those would be in place, but in the home, it is just part of parenting to explain the "DOs and DON'Ts" of social etiquette, pass on moral values so a youngster knows right from wrong, and that extends further into being a balanced individual.
In parallel with relationships and sex, porn surely gets some bit of the discussion (so many issues to consider, whole new website to discuss that one!) and if not, then IMHO, it should, along with many more aspects of an "Online presence" such as e-bullying, and how it could be detrimental to fill a Facebook account with photos of someone out with their friends, getting drunk, running wild on holiday, etc, etc, because it might be seen in future by an employer (or university even).
Let's face it, even the term pornography is barbed, because how can someone judge (yes, even a judge or magistrate) what is likely to "deprave or corrupt" someone else. I think that so long as material doesn't include children, animals, torture/death, then HM Customs and Excise are quite relaxed about what is now allowed into the UK, in most part because European countries don't have the prudish sensibilities that some Brits do (and I suspect that it was a result of the Victorian gentry having a very two-faced attitude - the rich did what they wanted behind closed doors, with each other, and perhaps some of the servants, while at the same time passing draconian laws which would impact on the lower classes far more).
We've moved on, for better or worse, and have Ann Summers and Private shops in many towns and cities, and slowly there have been adjustments in what is accepted by the BBFC, and importantly, by HMC+E.
I don't buy or sell porn, I'm on the sidelines like many other people, but am as far against censorship as you seem to be in favour of it.