Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Government is 'most female-unfriendly' in living memory, says TUC

53 replies

ttosca · 14/03/2012 13:15

The Government was accused today of being the most "female-unfriendly" in living memory following new research showing how difficult it is for women to find well-paid part-time work.

The TUC said it expects another rise in female unemployment when official figures are published today, following last month's figure of 1.12 million.

A study by the union organisation showed that thousands of skilled professional women in the public sector were set to lose their jobs because of spending cuts, while jobs in private firms were often low-skilled and poorly paid.

Women's employment in the private sector remains concentrated in areas such as caring, catering, cleaning and clerical work, with a gender pay gap of more than 18%, twice as high as in the public sector, said the report, being discussed today at the TUC Women's Conference in London.

Half of women in private companies earn less than £15,000, compared to fewer than one in five men, the study showed.

General secretary Brendan Barber said: "Over a million women are now without work, with female unemployment rising by nearly a quarter in the North East over the last year.

"But this is not just about a jobs crisis. Women are twice as likely to be affected by the cuts as men. Child benefit and tax credits are being sacrificed as ministers look for ways to cut the tax rate for people earning more than £150,000, even though they get more in tax breaks than most women earn in a year.

"Women are being disproportionately hit by the pay freezes, pension reforms and massive jobs cull in the public sector.

"Basic employment rights are under threat and refuges for victims of domestic violence are being closed. The evidence is clear - this is the most female-unfriendly government in living memory."

A separate report by Women Like Us, which supports working mothers, found a lack of quality part-time jobs, which is hitting the kind of work skilled women could apply for.

Just 3% of part-time jobs pay £20,000 or more, putting women at a "distinct disadvantage" when looking for work, said the group, claiming there was a "blind spot" in official data on part-time vacancies.

Thousands of mothers face a "dead-end choice" between trading down their skills and experience, or not working at all, it was warned.

The lack of quality part-time jobs has a particular impact on mothers with fewer skills as they face competition from higher-skilled women, said Women Like Us.

Co-founder Emma Stewart said: "The creation of more quality part-time vacancies would help thousands of mothers from squeezed income families, enabling them to optimise their earnings in the hours they have available to work."

A government spokesman said: "The Government is making a real difference to women's lives by creating more opportunities and removing barriers to career progression.

"We are introducing flexible parental leave, extending flexible working, investing in childcare and taking action to reduce the gender pay gap. We have already exempted 1.1 million of the lowest paid workers - the majority of whom are women - from paying income tax.

"In addition, we have set up the Women's Business Council and are providing resources for volunteer business mentors who will support women who want to start or grow their own businesses."

www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/government-is-most-femaleunfriendly-in-living-memory-says-tuc-7565897.html

OP posts:
teejwood · 14/03/2012 13:35

genuine question - how many women have top jobs in the TUC/unions? we only ever see the same men on the news - Brendan Barber etc.
tia

claig · 14/03/2012 15:24

Very good question, teejwood Grin

loveisagirlnameddaisy · 14/03/2012 15:48

What a surprise. A left-wing union is slagging off a (sort of) right wing government. I've met a few of the men in charge of unions (through work) and they're all old school, Marxist and often sexist. Which makes this report quite ironic.

niceguy2 · 14/03/2012 16:35

So are the government "male friendly" then? Given the changes proposed I can't say that it is either.

As for the tax breaks the those who earn > £150k get, what are they? As far as I am aware they lost their personal allowance, CB will be lost next year and they pay 50% of their (sizeable) income. What are the supposed tax breaks they refer to?

sportsfanatic · 14/03/2012 17:23

Sooo.. the trade unions are saying that the government is female unfriendly...pot, kettle, black.....

WasabiTillyMinto · 14/03/2012 17:38

i read this story is Private Eye ages ago..."The panel said that Julie Atkinson, a member of Aslef's staff, was struck by the Mr Samways but there was no evidence of any wrongdoing by her..The president struck Miss Atkinson on the mouth as she attempted to pass by him. We have not been able to reach any firm conclusion as to whether this blow was deliberate."

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1464714/Union-chief-rejects-60000-pay-off-over-barbecue-fight.html

minimathsmouse · 14/03/2012 19:33

Marxist and often sexist. Which makes this report quite ironic
Engles was very enlightened about women and marxist feminists would argue that all discrimination comes from class antagonism. Other's might argue that all forms of discrimination come from the patriarchy(rich white men) So rich white men are generally the elite, followed by white men and finally those most oppressed are black women.

Either way it can be argued that women are discriminated against by elite white men and black women often the poorest economically fair the worst.

"We are introducing flexible parental leave, extending flexible working, investing in childcare and taking action to reduce the gender pay gap. All well and good but this will only benefit SOME women. Women who have already benefited from a good education and have been fortunate enough to study and train for a career. This will not help working class women from deprived areas.

We have already exempted 1.1 million of the lowest paid workers - the majority of whom are women - from paying income tax at least this is an admission that more low paid jobs are performed by women but misses the point that low pay/low skill isn't always interconnected. Sectors that women tend to work in have over time become lower paid and of lower social status. Teaching is a good example of this. As more women moved into employment and many into teaching, primary teaching in particular, the salary has not kept pace with inflation, no real rise in real terms over the last 30yrs. Exempting low waged women workers will not address the issue of women's low pay. It effectively condones sexism.

I think the Tory's are all for equality for the women of their own class, sod the rest of us!

WidowWadman · 14/03/2012 21:16

"following new research showing how difficult it is for women to find well-paid part-time work"

Maybe things would be better if women wouldn't be told all the time that they should be looking for part time instead of full time work, and that childcare issues are women's issues instead of parents' issues.

The majority of well paid jobs simply wouldn't work part time.

pointythings · 14/03/2012 22:18

niceguy they don't pay 50% of £150,000. They pay 50% of everything they earn over £150,000. Until they reach that barrier they pay 40%. Not exactly hardship, that.

EdlessAllenPoe · 14/03/2012 22:20

it is a cultural thing about Northern labour strongholds that they are hives of chauvinism, and thence comes many a trade unionite....

so yes, pretty ironic.

niceguy2 · 14/03/2012 22:31

I understand that pointy. I never said it was hardship but my point (no pun intended) was to ask where these tax break are that the unions are suggesting they get.

Or are we not bothered about the truth as long as it makes a good headline?

teejwood · 14/03/2012 22:39

pointy to be completely shallow for a moment, I would quite like to have that burden to carry Wink it'll never happen, though.

seriously, though, i don't believe any of the parties' interests are aligned with the population any more. nor are the unions. and this is hardly a new development. they all just want to make sure they hang onto their own power bases and vested interests.

us "normal" people are bit-players, ignored at best, until we get our collective acts together and start asking questions. but as a nation we are disinterested in politics and don't hold our representatives accountable for their actions, so we probably get what we deserve, sadly.

EnjoyResponsibly · 14/03/2012 22:42

Could be I'm a thick here, but how is it the Governments fault (any Government, not just the present incumbent) if private companies don't pay very high wages?

Is it not the job of a Union to negotiate wages between Employer and Employees?

minimathsmouse · 14/03/2012 22:49

EnjoyResponsiby,
The Government set the NMW and they top up wages through Tax credit. Fewer people belong to unions. Unions don't have the powers they used to.

niceguy2 · 15/03/2012 09:33

And thank goodness they don't.

Grag · 15/03/2012 11:04

The TUC are a bunch of left-wing dolts.

loveisagirlnameddaisy · 15/03/2012 13:13

Unions used to be a good thing. Just like the Labour party used to be a good thing for the genuine working class. Neither have held onto their values particularly well.

edam · 15/03/2012 13:42

The TUC is right - whatever you think of them, government policies are hitting women hardest. Whether that's public sector job cuts or refuges for victims of domestic violence or a host of other measures.

loveisagirlnameddaisy · 15/03/2012 13:52

But what cuts was the government supposed to make? Everyone's pretty much accepted now that we couldn't keep growing the deficit (even Miliband), so whichever public service was cut is always going to be unpopular to some.

Moreover, there is so much spin going on its untrue. My partner is a county councillor and knows for a fact that headlines put out by the opposition about police cuts in our area are simply not correct. He's got the figures from the chief of police to back this up. It makes me cross.

niceguy2 · 15/03/2012 17:10

The policies are only "hitting women the hardest" because they use the welfare state more than men do.

The government are not 'targetting' women because they are woman haters.

If that line of logic is extended then you could argue that raising taxes hits men the hardest.

MoreBeta · 15/03/2012 17:13

While I don't necessarily disagree with the facts that the TUC has stated I don't think the TUC and indeed the union movement or the Labour Party has generally has been entirely female friendly either.

TheRhubarb · 15/03/2012 17:14

Why is anyone so surprised that a Tory government is mainly all male?

minimathsmouse · 15/03/2012 19:04

Niceguy2, they are not raising taxes though, just as Rhubarb says, Torries are all male, I would add, rich white and male.

Why are people so happy to accept everything they are told? Why do we have to cut public services, make more people unemployed, shrink the economy and make the vulnerable suffer for mistakes they haven't made? Why should women bear the brunt of rich men gambling in stocks and shares, playing fast and loose with others money, fooling their clients (anyone seen the mail today) and companies that avoid tax (look into the tax avoidance schemers at PriceWaterhouseCoopers who are very cosy with this government)

Ever read Foucault on post modernism? He questioned why people were cowed by the "rationalists"

EdlessAllenPoe · 15/03/2012 19:39

most politicians are men.

and not all Conservative ministers are

one wonders, if labour had implemented the 18 billion of cuts it promised at the last election, how it planned to avoid a disproportionate affect on women.

Cos i don't see much real difference in the actual deal on the table, either way...despite Ed milliband making vaguely disapproving noises about things.

Grag · 15/03/2012 19:46

"Torries are all male, I would add, rich white and male."
What? Do you really believe this?