"no, really culpable of what?"
Firstly, silence, every profesional has to report any suspicions that a child is being mistreated. The same applies in most cases, such as main stream churches, a religious leader, Vicar, Priest etc can break silence if a child is at risk, so can counsellors.
This policy can be extended to fringe churches, some childrenare still taken to church for exorcism whilststill recovering from beatings, this now has tobe put in leglislation.
The public and posters on here is aware of this case, but SW's are dealing with lesser cases, daily.
Female circumcision has been cut down on, because the law got tougher on it.
Churches in the UK should not be advocating beating children with objects and get away with it,under the law, as they can now.
There are gaps and any CP SW will tell you this and they can be filled, so this isn't happening to the level that it is. This was first discussd after the death of V Climbie, we shouldn't be still just discussing it, 12 years later.
In certain areas this practice needs to be campaigned against, with posters etc, in the same way that DV is addressed.
It isn't hard to prove that the church was complaicent, when the hed of the church is visiting the children at home and seeing their injuries.
You find that once an suspision is raised,others come forward, to testify, it starts to at least break a cycle of behaviour and belief.