Haunt, why?
Because women should feel confident that if they chose a VB they would receive excellent care, that their likelihood of experiencing pain, fear, forceps, damage is practically non-existent. Then, if they chose a c/section it will be likely for other reasons personal to them and not about fear or fear of the unpredictability of birth that is linked to environment, personnel and budgets.
And if you can remove so many of the things that go wrong for women who give birth by VB, that are very often LINKED to those things I mention above, then actually the outcome for mother and baby is vastly better that if the mother has a C/S.
Sadly, all I mention above is reality and can cause women so many problems it can make a c/s the better option.
I don't think many women have had an optimal VB. That would mean no fear, knowing the m/w who is permenently present. No internals. No monitoring. No touching. No beds. No semi-reclining positions. No clocks. No 'delivery' (babies are born, not delivered and usually the mother can do this herself. No instructions and absolutely no interference, - just quality safety monitoring.
With this, all the right hormones will do what they are designed to do and mother and baby will benefit and continue to with the ability to safely co-sleep, quickly recover, breastfeeding and bond.
Few vbs are actually like this.