Okay, so if I understand this correctly.
Women should not work unless they're generating revenue (but presumably men can?) and if they are producing revenue, then they must only do hours which fit in with a child's day, so assuming that's a school aged child, that will be say, 8:30 to 15:00, with 6 weeks off for summer, plus half terms and other holidays. Naturally, as teachers aren't revenue producing jobs, even though it is quite a suitable (in terms of time off when child's off) work for women, women can't do it. Also, I assume women shouldn't be nurses, doctors, any kind of carer role, any kind of support role, academics ... it's quite limited.
Why is Jill actually around to work, as presumably "director of Conservative think-tank" is not a revenue-generating job, and is kind of one of those flappy, head-in-the-arse, non-essential jobs that she's saying shouldn't exist?
Of course though, with all this spare time mothers are suddenly going to get as they're not working, they can do all the jobs that the new government thinks "Big Society" should be doing, like, I don't know, setting up and running schools and what not.
What is this government on, and can I have some, as it sounds like fun - they're off their rockers.