Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest Post

Guest Post: "Education is about partnership – and we owe it to all our children to work together in their best interests" - Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson MP's back to school message for parents

236 replies

SophiaCMumsnet · 03/09/2024 12:49

Bridget Phillipson MP

Bridget Phillipson is the Secretary of State for Education

I love back to school week. Sending my children off to school on their first day back, I’m always sad (and maybe a little relieved!) to see them go, but I think forward with such excitement to what the new school year will bring for them. New friends, new experiences, new opportunities.

You all know that familiar mix of feelings as they walk through the school gates once again – nervous, excited, hopeful. If you’re anything like me though, overall, you just want them to do well and be happy.

As parents, we all want the best for our children, both in school and beyond. We want them to grow up happy and healthy, to get a good job, and to be able to buy a nice house.

I understand those aspirations – I share them for my own children and, as Education Secretary, for yours. That’s why this job is the greatest privilege of my life. I want to make sure each and every child gets the best start in life, to ensure that where you’re from doesn’t determine where you end up. By breaking the link between background and future success, we can break down barriers to opportunity and give all children the skills they need to thrive.

Education lies at the heart of this change we all want to see. And education means more than maths or English or science, as important as they are. An excellent, whole-childhood education journey builds a lifelong love of learning, nurtures a sense of belonging, and creates connections that last for years to come. A good education gives our children strong foundations and sets them up for work and for life.

High and rising standards in all of our schools is at the heart of our plan. My offer to you is this: I’ll support your children taking their first steps into learning. I’ll put 6,500 new expert teachers in classrooms across the country. I’ll introduce free breakfast clubs in all primary schools. I’ll improve professional careers advice and work experience. I’ll expand support for families by rolling out funded childcare. I’ll review the curriculum, making it richer and broader, setting all children up to thrive now and in the future. I’ll boost mental health support across our schools and reform provision for children with special educational needs and disabilities.

I’m ambitious for our children and for our country. But government can’t achieve all this in isolation. I want to work in partnership with you to deliver the very best life chances for our children. We all have responsibilities – you as parents, us as government, and schools do too. I want to reset these relationships, rebuild trust and work together for the benefit of all our children.

I need all parents to play their part too. Every child is different and you know your child best. I know that every child has different needs, but one thing that can have the biggest positive impact for children is making sure they go to school. When things are working well and children have the right support, ambition, opportunities, belonging, all come from being in school. However excellent our teachers, they can’t teach children who aren’t there. As I put in place measures to drive high and rising standards in schools, children who are absent won’t feel the benefit of them.

Attendance from day one really matters. Children who miss a day at the beginning of a new term are much more likely to be persistently absent for the rest of the school year. So my ask of you for this back to school week is simple, but crucial. If you make sure your children are where they belong - in school - schools are there by your side to support you in this, and so is government.

Education is about partnership – and we owe it to all our children to work together in their best interests. As a new September rolls round, let’s use this moment to fix our foundations, begin the work of rebuilding Britain. Happy back to school week!

Guest Post: "Education is about partnership – and we owe it to all our children to work together in their best interests" - Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson MP's back to school message for parents
OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Xenia · 11/09/2024 11:43

Surf and others good posts and the one from the Governing body of a state school I just read a few places up Meltdown247 that they have been told they must prepare to many new pupils from January in the state school in the home counties as this final straw causes parents to move over.

The House of Lords should be listened to on this and their debate, by Labour and change the policy or hopefully the first litigation or the proposed ISC October litigation will succeed.

I know this is not too relevant an issue for SEND parents, but the demographic who pay day school fees like my NHS doctor father and teacher mother back then and today (we were a lawyer and teacher couple when we paid fees) has been very much hit by the highest tax burden in i70 years under the Tories whereas others have had tax cuts. This group often have 9% graduate tax/student loan charge too and have high mortgage and rents if they are in the SE. They often have no personal tax allowance now. They have been stripped of all child benefit (as a single mother I was stripped of all child benefit too). Their effective marginal rates of tax particularly if 9% student loan tax is added on are off the scale - 70% plus and at a time when we want people like they are to work longer hours and earn more and pay more tax as productivity is so low this is not going to help the country.

To hit this group of working parents who have chosen to put their children first rather than have an extra holiday is particularly nasty never mind illegal. I hope Labour is hoist by its own human right petard and hung out to dry with lots of money going to the lawyers in the process. 20% of pupils at sixth form level go to private schools and plenty of parents who aren't yet paying fees might have planned to do so in future.

Instead Labour should give every parent a £7k voucher to use at school in state or private sector and allow 100% of childcare costs including nurseries and nannies to be set against tax where both parents work full time and give the 30 free hours to all parents and not exclude NHS doctors and other graduate higher earners from that.

LuckyPoster · 14/09/2024 17:29

Urgent: VAT on Private School Fees Consultation Ending Soon
It has only recently come to light that H.M. Treasury has opened a consultation—created under the Labour Government—on imposing VAT on private school fees. Unfortunately, key contact information for submitting responses seems to be buried in the documents (refer to page 21 of the first PDF and page 3, item 22, of the third document linked below).

Many people remain unaware of this consultation, and the deadline for responses is this Sunday, 15th September—just days away!

This legislation will have a significant impact on private schools, their pupils, parents, and staff across our constituency. We urge you to express your opposition to this proposal and make your voice heard. Your input could influence the outcome.

Please consider sharing your view with the Government urgently. You can go directly to the Government website by clicking on the following link.

www.gov.uk/government/publications/vat-on-private-school-fees-removing-the-charitable-rates-relief-for-private-schools The above is a consultation to VAT on school fees from the Treasury. Unfortunately it has been kept so quiet and the closing date is this weekend!

Xenia · 14/09/2024 19:03

It is more of a technical consultation however as these are they ask

"Question 1: Does the above definition of private schools capture all
private schools across the UK?
• Question 2: Does this definition inadvertently capture any
organisations that this policy does not intend to capture?
• Question 3: Does the above “connected persons” test capture the
relationships that exist between private schools and third parties?
• Question 4: Does this “connected persons” test inadvertently
capture any relationships that it is not intended to capture?
• Question 5: Does this approach achieve the intended policy aims
across all four UK nations?"

So I do not really regard it as a consultation on whether the proposal should go ahead.

TopCat2022 · 15/09/2024 20:33

If you are responding to the Technical consultation
Please oppose

  • it on your own analysis and
  • based on the grounds that there is no independent impact analysis that has been released to the parents, schools and all stakeholders.
  • The IFS study is not thorough enough and Labour's Lord Hacking has questioned the figures in his letter to the Prime Minister.
So for Question 5: Does this approach achieve the intended policy aims across all four UK nations?" NO IT DOES NOT.... List your own ideas and also include the following

The Education Not Taxation Group (ENT) has requested anyone sending information through to ask the question

Freedom of Information (FOI) Request On 5th August, Education Not Tax (ENT) admins sent an FOI request to the Treasury, asking for the analysis, evidence and impact assessments they refer to in their technical note. Her Majesty's Treasury refused to share anything on the basis they are still in an advisory stage

ENT has appealed, noting that
(1) you say all this work is complete
(2) you have proceeded to draft legislation based on the work being complete (3) your actions appear designed to frustrate scrutiny and ENT representatives being able to do their jobs, especially given the aggressive and harmful timeline being pursued by the Government
(4) if the work has been passed to the OBR, as you suggest, it's invidious that you are still in "edit mode"; the OBR's role is to comment on the final version not be a consulting partner.

Please answer can you answer the questions and release the FOI information requested to ENT.

Keir Starmer has publicly informed the nation about his personal commitment to transparency.

Putting your intended actions into place at the October budget (via the OBR assessment & Finance Bill) without releasing all information for parents and schools to make an informed response and decision to consider long term effects is not a fair consultation process.

Remember Alexis is fighting and her daughter is fighting on our behalf too - pls support her
https://tinyurl.com/ENTAlexis

Education Not Discrimination

I am a solo parent of a child with additional needs who wants to ensure she maintains access to her current educational provision

https://tinyurl.com/ENTAlexis?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR1T3UJaa3k-1Wz9NMuKVLH4B2dsJIRE37uTjlveDTrsdVhhRz66iQyvx74_aem_1fDQgrF8ozqXTtD_gL3lyA

TopCat2022 · 15/09/2024 20:34

If you are responding to the Technical consultation
Please oppose

  • it on your own analysis and
  • based on the grounds that there is no independent impact analysis that has been released to the parents, schools and all stakeholders.
  • The IFS study is not thorough enough and Labour's Lord Hacking has questioned the figures in his letter to the Prime Minister.
So for Question 5: Does this approach achieve the intended policy aims across all four UK nations?" NO IT DOES NOT.... List your own ideas and also include the following

The Education Not Taxation Group (ENT) has requested anyone sending information through to ask the question

Freedom of Information (FOI) Request On 5th August, Education Not Tax (ENT) admins sent an FOI request to the Treasury, asking for the analysis, evidence and impact assessments they refer to in their technical note. Her Majesty's Treasury refused to share anything on the basis they are still in an advisory stage

ENT has appealed, noting that
(1) you say all this work is complete
(2) you have proceeded to draft legislation based on the work being complete (3) your actions appear designed to frustrate scrutiny and ENT representatives being able to do their jobs, especially given the aggressive and harmful timeline being pursued by the Government
(4) if the work has been passed to the OBR, as you suggest, it's invidious that you are still in "edit mode"; the OBR's role is to comment on the final version not be a consulting partner.

Please answer can you answer the questions and release the FOI information requested to ENT.

Keir Starmer has publicly informed the nation about his personal commitment to transparency.

Putting your intended actions into place at the October budget (via the OBR assessment & Finance Bill) without releasing all information for parents and schools to make an informed response and decision to consider long term effects is not a fair consultation process.

Remember Alexis is fighting and her daughter is fighting on our behalf too - pls support her
https://educationnottaxation.org/legal/

Legal

We are now able to share details of the legal action we are championing, and how you can help. We need your support to crowdfund this legal challenge.There are many reasons why you may oppose the i…

https://educationnottaxation.org/legal

Zaylok · 17/09/2024 12:01

Bridget - where are you? Is this a ghost thread where the poster never comes back to answer the responses. Surely the point of a post is to generate responses and then respond back to them.

EmpressaurusDeiGatti · 17/09/2024 12:22

Zaylok · 17/09/2024 12:01

Bridget - where are you? Is this a ghost thread where the poster never comes back to answer the responses. Surely the point of a post is to generate responses and then respond back to them.

Standard practice on guest posts I think.

RhiannonEMumsnet · 17/09/2024 16:02

Hi everyone,

Thanks for all your responses. As this is a guest post rather than a web chat, the Education Secretary won't be responding on the thread - but we've passed your comments and questions on via her team. Given the obvious interest in her portfolio, we'll also see if it's possible to arrange a web chat at some point in the future.

Thanks,
MNHQ

EmpressaurusDeiGatti · 17/09/2024 17:06

@RhiannonEMumsnet, to avoid frustration could guest posts start with a warning that the OP won’t be returning to the thread?

TopCat2022 · 17/09/2024 20:57

Thanks for your response @MNHQ please pass on to the Education Secretary the following: and respond publicly about this FOI Request

FOI Request I understand on 5th August, Education Not Tax (ENT) admins sent an FOI request to the Treasury, asking for the analysis, evidence and impact assessments they refer to in their technical note. HMT refused to share anything on the basis they are still in an advisory stage (please see Appendix).
ENT has appealed, noting that (1) you say all this work is complete (2)you have proceeded to draft legislation based on the work being complete (3) your actions appear designed to frustrate scrutiny and ENT representatives being able to do their jobs, especially given the aggressive and harmful timeline being pursued by the Government (4) if the work has been passed to the OBR, as you suggest, it's invidious that you are still in "edit mode"; the OBR's role is to comment on the final version not be a consulting partner.

Please answer can you answer the questions and release the FOI information requested to ENT. Putting your intended policies into place at the October budget (via the OBR assessment & Finance Bill) without releasing all information for parents and schools to make an informed response and decision to consider long term effects is not a fair consultation process.

Keir Starmer has publicly informed the nation about his personal commitment to transparency.

Question 5 of your recent consultation document on the pending VAT and Business Rates- Does this approach achieve the intended policy aims across all four UK nations?
NO, it falls short. I understand that there is a deficit in the nation’s finances of £22m which needs to be found by the end of the year and you are eager to implement policies to raise and save money to enhance the nation’s state education and other areas like the NHS. However, for this independent school fee VAT and Business rates implementation, I and 1000's of other independent school (not rich) parents have not seen any publicly available comprehensive independent impact assessment (apart from the IFS controversial study). The policy is being rushed without considering potential consequences.

Weewaa · 28/09/2024 19:33

70-80% of an independent schools takings are solely for staff wages
surely we should not be paying VAT on staff wages for the teachers to pay income tax on those wages. It's like being taxed twice.
VAT should be payed on the remainder only if the school takings.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page