My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

MNHQ have commented on this thread

Guest posts

Guest post from the Home Secretary: “The most vulnerable children urgently need more protection during lockdown”

127 replies

BojanaMumsnet · 03/06/2020 09:22

More children than ever now have access to the internet, with as many as half of all 10-year-olds owning a smartphone. Some spend more time chatting online than they do with friends or relatives in person.

As parents, we know the huge benefits the online world can bring to our children – opening up new horizons at the swipe of a screen – but we also have to be alive to the horrific dangers it can harbour.

The past weeks have undoubtedly been a difficult time for families, with parents having to juggle work and homeschooling. Many will be even more anxious after hearing warnings that internet predators may take advantage of the fact that children are off school and spending longer online.

I share your concerns and will use the full might of our law against these vile criminals. As Home Secretary, I work across government and policing to help ensure vulnerable children are protected from abuse. But as a parent, I too worry about my son when he spends hours on his phone. We don’t want to take our children’s devices away from them, but we need to make sure that they’re being protected from people approaching them who intend to do them harm.

Thankfully, parents don’t have to navigate the complexities of internet safety alone. Forums like Mumsnet are a wonderful way to brainstorm ideas, support each other and share experiences of the different ways children are dealing with the pressures of the lockdown, and some of the threats and challenges they are confronted with.

There are also plenty of resources developed by specialists and children’s charities which can help parents protect their children online, and we have compiled this guidance to help parents and carers find the right ones. It highlights the importance of age-appropriate parental controls, which I use myself for my son. These controls can help block unsuitable content, including nudity or excessive violence, or prevent children from buying things when playing games.

Our excellent law enforcement agencies are also working flat out to keep our children safe, including advising parents and carers how they can play their part. The National Crime Agency’s Thinkuknow campaign helps children of all ages develop the skills, knowledge and confidence they need to identify risk online and access help when they need it. The campaign includes animations for primary-age children and, for teens, guidance on relationships and sending images.

It also advises on steps we can all take to protect our children. This can be keeping communication channels open and talking to them about online dangers, or discussing their favourite new websites and apps – which may have changed during the pandemic. For younger children, it is also advised to talk about online safety as soon as they have an interest in using a family device – Thinkuknow has lots of advice on how to do this in an age-appropriate way.

Alongside ensuring parents are armed with the tools they need to protect their families, I am working across the government and with charities to ensure our children stay safe. The amazing voluntary sector has been ramping up their efforts to protect young people in this time of crisis, and we are continuing to work together to ensure that victims and survivors have access to the best possible support.

My mission to make the internet a safe place for young people to thrive has not been thrown off course by Coronavirus. The government continues to work at pace on our Online Harms legislation, which will place a legal duty on tech firms to protect vulnerable users from harmful content.

And we are acting now to do more when the most vulnerable children may need it most. That includes those who are not safe in their own homes, who may feel particularly vulnerable, afraid and exposed during the lockdown period. Last month, the Prime Minister hosted a Hidden Harms Summit to bring together experts and organisations to explore what more we can do to protect vulnerable people during and after lockdown, including children at risk of sexual abuse.

Have no doubt, while children are at risk of these heinous crimes, we will provide help wherever it is needed. As a Government we’ve provided additional funding of over £3.2 billion for local authorities, helping them to support the most vulnerable during lockdown. We have also invested £1.6 million to expand and promote the NSPCC’s helpline for adults, offering advice and support on how to raise concerns about children at risk.

Our next big step will be to publish a national strategy later this year to tackle all forms of child sexual abuse and bring predators to justice. 

My message to worried parents is simple. I know how you feel, I share your horror, and I will not stop until we have rooted out the abusers who prey on our children. I have met with victims of sickening child sexual abuse and their stories have only strengthened my resolve to prevent this horrendous crime from shattering the lives of more young people and their families.

That is why I will continue to do everything in my power to crack down on abusers online and offline, and to arm you with the support and tools you need to reduce your child’s risk of being targeted by paedophiles.

As parents, we keep our children’s welfare at the heart of everything we do. Let’s join forces to ensure our loved ones are using the internet in a safe way. Protecting our children’s lives and securing their futures, during lockdown and beyond.

The Home Secretary will respond to some comments and questions next week.

OP posts:
Report
Msmcc1212 · 05/06/2020 19:34

Today 16:23 DDemelza: I think I read your post and can’t remember it breaking the rules. You made a heart felt plea about something important and emotive if I remember rightly? I think you may have used a swear word - May that’s why?

I have had two posts deleted for no good reason. I do feel for this particular thread, the threshold has perhaps changed.

If yours is the thread I remember, you were asking about the ‘hostile environment’ policy and it’s effect on families and children?

I know a family who we’re separated due to this policy too. American mum (married in UK), british dad. Two children. Separated for months for no good reason.

Do you think you could bring yourself to post again with less emotive language because you were making a good point. If we are talking about children and their wellbeing it has to be wider than just one issue.

Good family relationships are key to protecting children from outside harm.

Report
Devlesko · 07/06/2020 20:57

Why have you tried to rush through a law discriminating against Gypsy Roma Travellers, are you aware that your proposals are racist.
You stated your recommendation were because of the mess that some travellers left, so this made it harder for them. I can understand peoples frustration, but does that mean if a non traveller leaves a mess you are going to take their homes off them too.
Even the Police commissioner disagreed with you.
How You , Michael Gove and Boris have treated us during the lockdown is disgusting. leaving families with no food and water, insisting that Police evict families with nowhere to go, and the worst MG whipping up a media storm to have a vulnerable family removed who were doing everything they were told by the council.
You should be ashamed to come on here and talk about vulnerable people. I hope the race commission throw the book at you, personally as this law is your baby.

Report
Glowcat · 07/06/2020 21:01

How are you helping the 100,000+ children whose parents are legally living and working in the UK but have NRPF (no recourse to public funds) during this lockdown? Many of those who have NRPF are working in frontline roles during the CV-19 crisis – as NHS cleaners, in social care or food preparation – but have no support to rely on when they are most in need.

The Children’s Society has called on the government to suspend the NRPF condition during this pandemic. How are you going to help these vulnerable children?

Link to the view The Children’s Society report
www.childrenssociety.org.uk/what-we-do/resources-and-publications/a-lifeline-for-all

Report
LangClegsInSpace · 12/06/2020 21:16

Priti Patel never came back then Hmm

Report
Msmcc1212 · 13/06/2020 10:35

Hellllloooooo. Ms Patel?! Are you there? Hello?...

Report
BankofNook · 13/06/2020 11:58

Has anyone checked the nearest fridge? She might be paying Boris a visit.

Report
Msmcc1212 · 13/06/2020 17:36

Ah yes. Check the fridge. Good idea!

Report
alreadytaken · 13/06/2020 18:06

fridges are not big enough for both of them. Obviously Cummings forgot to tell her to come back.

Report
BojanaMumsnet · 15/06/2020 10:03

Hello,

We're sorry about the delayed answers from the Home Secretary - we're expecting them in the next few days.

OP posts:
Report
Gujee · 15/06/2020 15:00

Thank you MN and totally understand the delay as our Home Secretary has had a lot on recently.

Report
Msmcc1212 · 15/06/2020 19:20

www.theguardian.com/football/2020/jun/15/boris-johnson-rejects-marcus-rashfords-plea-for-free-school-meals-over-summer

Another failing of the government to protect vulnerable children. How does the Home Secretary justify this?

Report
Jason118 · 15/06/2020 19:34

If she had a lot on, then why post at all? What's the real point of all this?

Report
Msmcc1212 · 15/06/2020 23:13

^Jason118

If she had a lot on, then why post at all? What's the real point of all this?^

For PR but I fear it’s backfired!

Report
DateLoaf · 15/06/2020 23:47

The most vulnerable children also need the continuation of free school meals over the summer holidays. This is urgent. The government must do u-turn on their refusal.
Marcus Rashford is doing a brilliant campaign on this but only the government can make this happen.

Report
RowanMumsnet · 18/06/2020 14:16

Hello

With apologies for the delay - here (following posts) are the responses we've had from the Home Secretary.

Report
RowanMumsnet · 18/06/2020 14:17

@LangClegsInSpace

thenamesarealltaken I'm so sorry to hear what a tough childhood you had. You were terribly let down. You needed far more than just food and all our children need far more than just food.

I'm puzzled that you said I read the OP and thought it was OK. I don't understand the anger because the home secretary has not written about ensuring children don't go hungry and she has not written about LA children's services or protecting children from abuse and neglect within their homes.

She has written a post about internet safety.

That's an important topic but right now many children are going hungry and many vulnerable and struggling families have lost their entire support networks, both professional (social services, NHS, charity support) and informal (family and friends). And most children are not in school and are not being seen for routine health appointments so the chances of the most vulnerable children falling through the gaps is greatly increased. And this is all happening at a time when a huge number of people are experiencing severe financial and mental distress.

It's a perfect storm.

The home secretary has provided a link to a page with a collection of resources for keeping children safe online. It's a useful resource but it does nothing to ensure every child has enough to eat and it doesn't tackle the biggest, most immediate threats to children's safety and wellbeing.

Response from the Home Secretary Safeguarding vulnerable children is a top priority for me – particularly during this difficult time. As has been pointed out by the Mumsnet user, some families have sadly lost their support networks during coronavirus. The Home Office, along with the Department for Education, has recently set up the £7.6 million Vulnerable Children National Charities Strategic Relief Fund to provide relief to national children’s charities that provide services to safeguard vulnerable children and that have financially suffered due to the impact of coronavirus.

The Prime Minister also recently announced a new £120 million Covid Summer Food Fund for 1.3 million children in England – ensuring every child has enough to eat during the summer holidays.
Report
RowanMumsnet · 18/06/2020 14:19

@PacificState

What does the data tell us about how lockdown has affected things like family violence and child sexual abuse? Is the government collecting stats? I think I saw somewhere that calls to DV helplines have increased a lot but it must be a worry that a lot of things have gone unreported - even more so than usually. If pandemics are going to be a part of our future, agencies should be collecting stats and information now so that we know what we’re likely to have to deal with if/when lockdown happens again.

Response from the Home Secretary Hidden harms such as domestic abuse and child sexual abuse are a concern that I am worried may be rising during this period. We have seen examples of increases in calls to domestic abuse helplines of around 50% compared to the pre lockdown period and expert insight suggests the risk of online abuse may have increased.

We are working with law enforcement, safeguarding partners and the third sector to assess the threat and ensure they have the resources they need to tackle offending and provide the greatest protection for vulnerable children. Agencies, including the police and social care, are continuing to collect data which in time will enable us to see any changes in reporting and identification of hidden crimes. At the end of May we hosted the hidden harms summit, where the Prime Minister, myself and other government ministers talked with law enforcement, charities and the experts to drive action on how we are going to make sure we keep people safe.
Report
RowanMumsnet · 18/06/2020 14:20

@BankofNook

she REALLY drew the short straw didn't she

"Our approval rating is plummeting. You're a mum, Priti, get out there and appeal to some of your fellow mums by chatting about mum stuff..."

One thing the government could do to aid vulnerable children is to bring back Sure Start. Research shows that early intervention is key to improving outcomes for vulnerable children and Sure Start provided vital support to families who needed it.

I would like to know why the government are encouraging us to send our children back to school when, thanks to the relaxation of EHCP laws, school are now under minimal obligation to meet the needs of vulnerable SN pupils? School is no longer the best place for my DS as he will not have the support measures needed for him to access a decent standard of education.

Response from the Home Secretary Our first priority remains the safety and wellbeing of vulnerable children and young people, including those with special educational needs and disabilities. Whilst we have temporarily changed the law on Education, Health and Care (EHC) plans, we have done this in such a way that children and young people with complex needs continue to have legal rights to support. Given the unprecedented situation, the precise nature of this support may need to be modified temporarily.


We are working with educational settings to ensure that children and young people with EHC plans can attend where a risk assessment determines that their needs can be as safely or more safely met in the educational environment and provided online resources to ensure that those children that stay at home can continue to get a good standard of education. We want to ensure that children can be educated safely and we are working with schools to assess how we can do this.
Report
RowanMumsnet · 18/06/2020 14:21

[quote Glowcat]How are you helping the 100,000+ children whose parents are legally living and working in the UK but have NRPF (no recourse to public funds) during this lockdown? Many of those who have NRPF are working in frontline roles during the CV-19 crisis – as NHS cleaners, in social care or food preparation – but have no support to rely on when they are most in need.

The Children’s Society has called on the government to suspend the NRPF condition during this pandemic. How are you going to help these vulnerable children?

Link to the view The Children’s Society report
www.childrenssociety.org.uk/what-we-do/resources-and-publications/a-lifeline-for-all[/quote]
Response from the Home Secretary We have put in place a number of wide-ranging coronavirus measures for those with no recourse to public funds during this difficult time. This includes protection from evictions for renters, a mortgage holiday for those who need it, and support for those who need assistance with shopping and accessing medication.

The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, the Self-employed Income Support Scheme, Statutory Sick Pay, some other work-related benefits, such as contributory employment and support allowance, are also not classed as public funds and so are also available to those with no recourse to public funds. We have also extended the eligibility criteria for free school meals in England.

Finally, access to the NHS is not classed as a public fund. Anyone experiencing coronavirus symptoms will be treated for free, regardless of their immigration status, and no immigration checks are required.

Further advice on those with no recourse to public funds can be found here: www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-get-support-if-youre-a-migrant-living-in-the-uk.

Report
RowanMumsnet · 18/06/2020 14:22

@WomanDaresTo

Hi, Fiona from the We Can't Consent To This campaign here. Our campaign formed here on Mumsnet, after women like Natalie Connolly and Laura Huteson were killed in appalling violence by men who successfully avoided a murder charge by saying they asked for the violence as "rough sex". We're glad that you and your government have committed to supporting woman through the reintroduction of the domestic abuse bill, and children as you set out here. But we know the Domestic Abuse bill must go further - in providing funding for services and support to migrant women, and ending the evasion of justice through "rough sex" claims.

Do you agree that the rough sex defence is allowing men to get away with murdering and assaulting women, by claiming they consented to it? And can you say what the Government is going to do about it?

What assurances can you give the women who read this that men will no longer be able to evade justice, by claiming that women asked to be killed or violently assaulted?

Response from the Home Secretary Any attempt to use a ‘rough sex defence’ is utterly unacceptable, and I am working with my colleagues to make the law as clear as possible in this respect. The Domestic Abuse Bill is a once in a generation opportunity to end the horrific cycle of abuse that too many women in this country face. It will create a new legal definition to tackle all forms of abuse, including controlling behaviour, and ensure survivors have the support they need to rebuild their lives.
Report
Msmcc1212 · 18/06/2020 18:00

”The Prime Minister also recently announced a new £120 million Covid Summer Food Fund for 1.3 million children in England – ensuring every child has enough to eat during the summer holidays.“

Well. That is true, and a necessity, however, this was ONLY following a very public campaign by a high profile football player. Had the campaign not happened I wonder if Boris wouldn’t have made a U turn and let those vulnerable children go hungry? His initial response was to reject this idea.

Report
Msmcc1212 · 18/06/2020 18:02

Did the Home Secretary address the major theme of the posts which was the complete and utter lack of trust and faith in the current Government to act with anything close to integrity, honesty and compassion?

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

AppleKatie · 18/06/2020 18:10

No. No she did not.

In fact she didn’t address anything she didn’t want too and she waited until after the FSM u turn to say anything at all in a vain attempt to make political capital out of what should have been a humiliation for the government. I mean who needs to be TOLD that feeding vulnerable children over the summer is important. 🤦‍♀️

Report
LangClegsInSpace · 18/06/2020 18:12

The Prime Minister also recently announced a new £120 million Covid Summer Food Fund for 1.3 million children in England – ensuring every child has enough to eat during the summer holidays.

Absolute cheek of this!

Report
LangClegsInSpace · 18/06/2020 19:14

The issue with NRPF is that so many families with this visa condition were already living in extreme poverty before the virus hit. They were already highly likely to be living in insecure accommodation, if not actually homeless, because they can claim no help with rent. 'Protection' from eviction does not apply to all renters, only tenants and it's not protection, merely a delay. So even those who can manage to maintain a tenancy when they are in work do not have the means to make up their rent arrears if they are unable to work and are not furloughed. Those who are lodgers, licencees or just sofa surfing have no protection at all.

For those who cannot work and are not furloughed, and for those who do not qualify for the self-employed scheme (the home secretary will be aware that there are a number of gaps) the only help available is SSP (£95.85/week) or, if they have paid enough national insurance, 'new style' JSA/ESA (£74.35 / week or £58.90 for those under 25). You can't keep a family on that.

Access to NHS treatment is an issue for those who do not have the right to remain in the UK, or cannot show that they have the right to remain (Windrush, anyone?) Those with a visa will already have paid £400/year for each family member on top of their extortionate visa fees, for the privilege of using the NHS, often while working for the NHS and putting themselves right on the frontline of fighting this virus.

Treatment for coronavirus may be free regardless of immigration status but people will be charged for any treatment they might still need if they test negative. The policy is to charge migrants around twice the going rate for private healthcare. An immigration check may not be required to access treatment for coronavirus but people have had no assurance that their details will not then be passed to the home office.

I would like to think that the home secretary is merely out of touch but she is well aware of all this. The phrase 'hostile environment' is no accident.

The Windrush: Lessons Learned review was published less than three months ago.
www.gov.uk/government/publications/windrush-lessons-learned-review

Only last month the high court ruled NRPF was in breach of article 3 of the human rights act, after an 8 year old British child took the government to court.
dpglaw.co.uk/high-court-ruling-over-no-recourse-to-public-funds-delivers-further-blow-to-home-offices-discredited-hostile-environment-policy/

If people fear destitution they will not take time off work to self-isolate if they have symptoms, or if they are identified as a contact.

If people fear a huge NHS bill, immigration detention and deportation then they will not come forward for a test or for treatment.

So whatever your views on immigration policy, this affects us all. None of us are safe until everyone is safe.

Poor show, Ms Patel.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.