My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

MNHQ have commented on this thread

Guest posts

Guest post from the Home Secretary: “The most vulnerable children urgently need more protection during lockdown”

127 replies

BojanaMumsnet · 03/06/2020 09:22

More children than ever now have access to the internet, with as many as half of all 10-year-olds owning a smartphone. Some spend more time chatting online than they do with friends or relatives in person.

As parents, we know the huge benefits the online world can bring to our children – opening up new horizons at the swipe of a screen – but we also have to be alive to the horrific dangers it can harbour.

The past weeks have undoubtedly been a difficult time for families, with parents having to juggle work and homeschooling. Many will be even more anxious after hearing warnings that internet predators may take advantage of the fact that children are off school and spending longer online.

I share your concerns and will use the full might of our law against these vile criminals. As Home Secretary, I work across government and policing to help ensure vulnerable children are protected from abuse. But as a parent, I too worry about my son when he spends hours on his phone. We don’t want to take our children’s devices away from them, but we need to make sure that they’re being protected from people approaching them who intend to do them harm.

Thankfully, parents don’t have to navigate the complexities of internet safety alone. Forums like Mumsnet are a wonderful way to brainstorm ideas, support each other and share experiences of the different ways children are dealing with the pressures of the lockdown, and some of the threats and challenges they are confronted with.

There are also plenty of resources developed by specialists and children’s charities which can help parents protect their children online, and we have compiled this guidance to help parents and carers find the right ones. It highlights the importance of age-appropriate parental controls, which I use myself for my son. These controls can help block unsuitable content, including nudity or excessive violence, or prevent children from buying things when playing games.

Our excellent law enforcement agencies are also working flat out to keep our children safe, including advising parents and carers how they can play their part. The National Crime Agency’s Thinkuknow campaign helps children of all ages develop the skills, knowledge and confidence they need to identify risk online and access help when they need it. The campaign includes animations for primary-age children and, for teens, guidance on relationships and sending images.

It also advises on steps we can all take to protect our children. This can be keeping communication channels open and talking to them about online dangers, or discussing their favourite new websites and apps – which may have changed during the pandemic. For younger children, it is also advised to talk about online safety as soon as they have an interest in using a family device – Thinkuknow has lots of advice on how to do this in an age-appropriate way.

Alongside ensuring parents are armed with the tools they need to protect their families, I am working across the government and with charities to ensure our children stay safe. The amazing voluntary sector has been ramping up their efforts to protect young people in this time of crisis, and we are continuing to work together to ensure that victims and survivors have access to the best possible support.

My mission to make the internet a safe place for young people to thrive has not been thrown off course by Coronavirus. The government continues to work at pace on our Online Harms legislation, which will place a legal duty on tech firms to protect vulnerable users from harmful content.

And we are acting now to do more when the most vulnerable children may need it most. That includes those who are not safe in their own homes, who may feel particularly vulnerable, afraid and exposed during the lockdown period. Last month, the Prime Minister hosted a Hidden Harms Summit to bring together experts and organisations to explore what more we can do to protect vulnerable people during and after lockdown, including children at risk of sexual abuse.

Have no doubt, while children are at risk of these heinous crimes, we will provide help wherever it is needed. As a Government we’ve provided additional funding of over £3.2 billion for local authorities, helping them to support the most vulnerable during lockdown. We have also invested £1.6 million to expand and promote the NSPCC’s helpline for adults, offering advice and support on how to raise concerns about children at risk.

Our next big step will be to publish a national strategy later this year to tackle all forms of child sexual abuse and bring predators to justice. 

My message to worried parents is simple. I know how you feel, I share your horror, and I will not stop until we have rooted out the abusers who prey on our children. I have met with victims of sickening child sexual abuse and their stories have only strengthened my resolve to prevent this horrendous crime from shattering the lives of more young people and their families.

That is why I will continue to do everything in my power to crack down on abusers online and offline, and to arm you with the support and tools you need to reduce your child’s risk of being targeted by paedophiles.

As parents, we keep our children’s welfare at the heart of everything we do. Let’s join forces to ensure our loved ones are using the internet in a safe way. Protecting our children’s lives and securing their futures, during lockdown and beyond.

The Home Secretary will respond to some comments and questions next week.

OP posts:
Report
RowanMumsnet · 04/06/2020 11:01

Thanks @Moondust001 and others (sorry, can't quote a post that includes a quote).

The Home Secretary has committed to coming back and answering some questions - it's a condition of guest posts and we always ask people to do this (and get them to agree before we publish the post).

As lots of you will know we've hosted politicians of pretty much all stripes over the past ten years. We think giving our users the opportunity to engage and ask questions is a valuable thing.

Report
theDudesmummy · 04/06/2020 12:50

Ms Patel , I will not attack you personally, but you do realise that you your described the money being spent on the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse as money being "spaffed [ugh] up the wall", don't you? I would really like you to tell me (I work directly in the field of child sexual abuse) how you manage to square that one...

MN giving a platform to this hypocrisy is disappointing to me...

Report
theDudesmummy · 04/06/2020 12:52

*Sorry should have said "your boss described..."

Report
StillWeRise · 04/06/2020 13:14

thing is we don't have to get personal about this at all- the record is clear for all to see and we all know it from our own experience, whether it's our own familes not getting the services they need, or us struggling professionally against the odds in services that have been cut to the bone
when the government tries it on with stuff like this they just expose themselves even more, so I say bring it on
maybe @BojanaMumsnet we could have a voting system for which questions we would like the home secretary to answer? maybe our top 5?

Report
BlackberryCane · 04/06/2020 13:28

Priti, one way in which children may be very vulnerable is if they're being bullied. Can you tell us how your government intends to tackle bullying?

Report
Jason118 · 04/06/2020 13:30

Does the opposition have a right to reply to this propaganda?

Report
nogooddeedgoesunpunished · 04/06/2020 13:32

Why don't we move this to AIBU " I'm seeking your help to spin a catastrophic response to a pandemic. AIBU to think savage cuts to services over the years have had no impact on children's welfare ?"

Report
WilmaPantry · 04/06/2020 14:17

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Msmcc1212 · 04/06/2020 14:23

’BlackberryCane

Priti, one way in which children may be very vulnerable is if they're being bullied. Can you tell us how your government intends to tackle bullying?‘

Excellent question. Bullying is a pervasive issue that can have a hugely detrimental effect on a persons mental health and self esteem. I’d be very interested to hear the answer to this question.

Report
Msmcc1212 · 04/06/2020 14:25

theDudesmummy: well remembered. ‘Spaffed’? I remember that phrase too. Hugely disrespectful and invalidating to those that have experienced some of the worst deeds a human is capable of.

Report
raskolnikova · 04/06/2020 14:42

Priti, when I went to my Universal Credit interview last year, the interviewer asked me why I had returned to the UK from abroad. When I replied that it was because of domestic violence, she gave me a leaflet for a local women's/domestic violence charity. I couldn't help be notice the EU flag on the leaflet. Where are charities such as these going to get their funding from when we crash out of the EU next year? Is the Conservative government going to make up the shortfall?

Report
BlackberryCane · 04/06/2020 15:06

@Msmcc1212

’BlackberryCane

Priti, one way in which children may be very vulnerable is if they're being bullied. Can you tell us how your government intends to tackle bullying?‘

Excellent question. Bullying is a pervasive issue that can have a hugely detrimental effect on a persons mental health and self esteem. I’d be very interested to hear the answer to this question.

Thank you msmcc1212. It's such a vital issue, hopefully the Home Secretary will answer the question.
Report
raskolnikova · 04/06/2020 15:07

*help but notice

Report
WilmaPantry · 04/06/2020 16:11

My post deleted,
Super sensitive with this thread aren't we?

Report
LaLaLandIsNoFun · 04/06/2020 16:34

Toured gave soent the last 10 years systematically dismantling the very services and structures that help stop families and children from becoming vulnerable and creating some cruel and unusual ways to further destroy the fabric of society. From LAPSO, to workfare, from closing libraries/surestarts to strangling services designed to help women out of abuse: your government make me utterly utterly sick. Caring about vulnerable children? You’re having a laugh

Report
LaLaLandIsNoFun · 04/06/2020 16:36

@theDudesmummy

WTF????? ‘Spaffed’. That is appalling

Report
theDudesmummy · 04/06/2020 16:45

Yes, it is beyond appalling. I work with adult survivors and I actually could not believe this when it came out that Johnson had said this. But he did.

Report
theDudesmummy · 04/06/2020 16:47
Report
Msmcc1212 · 04/06/2020 17:08

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Lucylou37 · 04/06/2020 17:17

@Moondust001 I agree with you! This was my response from mumsnet when I complained about it '
We host guest posts and webchats with politicians of all parties and have done for many years - and we think giving Mumsnet users the opportunity to interact with people in power is an important feature of the site.

Which is fair enough, if we/the community know how the questions are chosen and they are not cherry picked by Patel's team! This government avoids any scrutiny, they stop certain journalists attending briefing and refuse to give interviews with certain broadcasters! How do we get Mumsnet to ensure this isn't allowed to happen? Will Priti he doing a live Q&A session?

Report
Lucylou37 · 04/06/2020 17:18

@RowanMumsnet sorry, I didn't tag you on previous post. Can you let us know what questions Priti will be answering, when she will be answering them and I assume she won't be picking them herself? Also, in future would it be more wise to allow the post with a live Q&A afterwards?

Report
theDudesmummy · 04/06/2020 17:20

Live Q&A with her on here would be a bunfight at best...

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Lucylou37 · 04/06/2020 17:23

@theDudesmummy this government never want to actually respond to the public though? They work for the public, yet never want to interact with them! I'd have far more respect for her if she put herself out there. It could be a moderated live chat, but I think it's important rather than hiding behind a cherry picked bunch of questions which she will have time to answer and spin!

Report
LangClegsInSpace · 04/06/2020 17:24

If you care about 'the most vulnerable children', why have you still done nothing about the 100,000+ children living in extreme poverty because their families have no recourse to public funds?

Boris Johnson did not appear to be aware of this issue until he gave evidence to the Liason Committee on 27 May, despite parliament having been briefed on this by the Children's Society in April and despite the publication of a Commons Library Briefing on 27 April - a whole month before the PM's comments.



www.childrenssociety.org.uk/what-we-do/resources-and-publications/suspend-the-no-recourse-to-public-funds-condition

researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-8888/CBP-8888.pdf

Rt Hon Stephen Timms, Chair of the Work and Pensions Committee, said:

Our social security system should be a safety net that protects people from destitution. But for hundreds of thousands of people who live and work in the UK legally, and for their children, it offers no support at all. In the midst of a global pandemic, with so many people prevented from working through no fault of their own, there is an urgent need for Government action. For two months, Ministers have been promising to act, but we’ve seen no substantial change.

The Prime Minister was clearly surprised to hear that people in this situation can’t claim Universal Credit or other benefits – so I am hopeful that he will now put his foot on the accelerator and offer much needed support to people facing financial hardship.

www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/work-and-pensions-committee/news-parliament-2017/chair-writes-to-pm-chairs-comments-19-21/

During yesterday's PMQ the PM said that those with NRPF can claim JSA or ESA if they have paid enough NI contributions. This is true, however these only pay £74.35 / week (£58.90 for those under 25). There are no additional amounts for spouses/partners or children. This will not even cover the rent for a single room in shared accommodation, let alone keep a family housed and fed.

So, will you scrap the no recourse to public funds condition?
Report
theDudesmummy · 04/06/2020 17:26

Oh I would relish the bunfight (although I would rather eat the buns and use something more substantial as a missile...facts, perhaps?). But it won't happen.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.