Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

Guest post: “The ULEZ is a bold measure – but a vital one.”

72 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 26/04/2019 14:41

London’s toxic air is an invisible killer and amounts to nothing short of a public health crisis. Thousands die prematurely every year in our city as a direct result of our polluted air, while many more develop life-changing illnesses including cancer, heart disease, dementia and asthma.

What makes this issue particularly scandalous is that it is our children who are among the hardest hit. They don’t contribute to the problem and yet they bear the brunt of it. In parts of London, for example, there are children growing up right now with stunted lungs because of exposure to filthy air – and this will affect them not just in the short-term, but for the rest of their lives.

As the Mayor of London, I’m not willing to shirk my responsibilities and turn a blind eye to young people in our city breathing dangerously polluted air. To do so would be to ignore the duty of care I have to our children. Protecting children’s health and life chances is surely a moral necessity in any civilised society. And so, that’s why my administration has chosen to push ahead with the boldest and most ambitious plans of any major city in the world to tackle air pollution. This includes supporting air quality audits around schools and nurseries to find ways we can improve the air our children breathe.

This month, we introduced the world’s first ever Ultra-Low Emission Zone, the toughest emission standard of any major city in the world. The ULEZ is the centrepiece of my campaign to clean up our dirty air and works by levying a daily charge on the oldest and most polluting vehicles entering central London. It is enforced 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year, and is designed to encourage more Londoners to get out of their cars and onto public transport, to switch to cleaner vehicles, or to walk or cycle. The ULEZ is set to expand even further in 2021, delivering benefits to all Londoners far beyond its boundaries.

Experts say the impact of the ULEZ will be transformative, with hazardous nitrogen oxides from exhaust pipes expected to be reduced by around 45 per cent. Along with a series of other measures we’re implementing – like no longer licensing new diesel taxis and buying only electric, hybrid or hydrogen-powered buses – we will be able to deliver cleaner air for millions of Londoners. 75 percent of London’s buses now meet clean air rules – we’re aiming to make that 100 percent by 2020.

To give you some idea of the difference we can make, King’s College London estimates that without action it would take 193 years to bring London’s air quality to within legal levels. But with the action we’re taking, we can hope to achieve this goal in just six years. This means the number of schools in London in areas breaching air pollution will be reduced from over 450 today to just five in 2020 and zero in 2025.

We know that traffic emissions are the biggest source of air pollution in our city and that addressing them is key to solving the problem. This is what the ULEZ is all about and it’s also why we’ve been working hard to make public transport a more attractive and affordable alternative for Londoners with our four-year freeze on TfL fares, and the unlimited Hopper bus fare.

But this issue is larger than London, or indeed the rest of the UK, which is in the midst of a similar air quality crisis. As a father and a politician, I spend a lot of time thinking about the world we’re going to leave for future generations. The natural environment that many of us took for granted throughout our lifetime is reaching a tipping point.

Our children appear to grasp this better than many adults and are starting to take action – from online activism to the recent school climate strikes taking place in cities around the world. It’s now time for all of us to see the bigger picture and realise that we can be the first generation who gets it and finds solutions, and the last generation that fails to rise to the challenge.

We have made huge strides in the past in turning the tide on air pollution and environmental problems in London so there is no reason why we can’t do so again. Fewer than 70 years ago, the Great Smog claimed thousands of lives and the River Thames was so polluted it was declared biologically dead. It took brave and innovative policies to make change happen but we proved it was possible.

In 2019, we face a different challenge. Often we can’t see the tiny pollution particles that weave their way deep into our children’s lungs, but we know they are there and that they pose a deadly threat. So I make no apology for the tough action I’m taking.

The ULEZ is a bold measure – but a vital one. It does require Londoners to adapt, but in such circumstances inaction simply isn’t an option. After all, we owe it to our children to ensure the air they breathe is clean and safe, and that the planet we leave to them isn’t imperilled by environmental degradation and climate change.

We will be forwarding your questions on 02/05/2019

OP posts:
AnyoneButAnton · 27/04/2019 17:16

What do you mean by emissions at source Fireman? The ULEZ is entirely concerned with tailpipe emissions. How do you reduce them?
A) changing the TFL bus fleet
B) reducing congestion to make buses more attractive and improve the flow of remaining vehicles
C) improving cycling options
D) disincentivising the driving of the most polluting vehicles
E) improving train/underground service

ULEZ addresses options b and d. The others are also being addressed by other means.

Zone4flaneur · 27/04/2019 17:25

So questions for Mayor Khan, then (as this is the purpose of the thread):

  • how do you know the ULEZ will reduce pollution levels?
  • how do you know that the pollution won't just be shifted elsewhere (s circular for example)? Can you tell us a bit about the modelling your team have done?
Zone4flaneur · 27/04/2019 17:26

Anton I would say it also works for improving cycling as it reduces conflict with cars and stops you getting a lungful of exhaust (Brixton road I'm looking at you).

FiremanKing · 27/04/2019 17:28

AnyoneButAnton

But as ever it’s the consumer that is being penalised. Not the manufacturers of vehicles.

BoneyBackJefferson · 27/04/2019 17:42

Is it really that bold a measure?
the cameras are in place, the ability take the money is already there.
and its very easy to say "we are protecting the children"

its a good clean political points score.

Yet it seems like the increase in knife crime is low on the political spectrum. Is this because it requires real effort?

AnyoneButAnton · 27/04/2019 17:51

Obviously locking up the entire upper management of VW and fining them to within an inch of their lives would be highly satisfying, but how would that address the fundamental problem that so many people do own and drive highly polluting vehicles in built up areas?

UnPocoLoco2 · 27/04/2019 22:59

The government is simply making the poor even poorer with all these extra fees and taxes. The government is broke. We know that. Bloody tories.
All parliament does is sit in a large room on their big bottoms shouting at each other. They simply get paid to have a holiday( and they take two or more weeks off with pay to have yet another holiday away from parliament) it disgusts me that they get to vote on their own pay increases
And they try to make you feel guilty if you question these fee increases with ' but you're children's health is suffering. We need this money to improve their health' it's all a load of bollocks in my humble opinion. Damn....I'm all rallied up now and it's almost bed time. Good night everyone.

ChardonnaysPrettySister · 28/04/2019 07:50

The government is simply making the poor even poorer with all these extra fees and taxes.

It's the Mayor of London who imposed ULEZ, not the Government.

Rosti1981 · 28/04/2019 08:32

Weirdly our 19 year old petrol car is exempt from the ULEZ charge, which really surprised me! Not that I ever drive into central London (zone 5 here).

Three questions:

  1. What assessment has been made of the overall environmental impact of scrapping older cars and replacing them with ones exempt from the ULEZ charge?
  2. What data is available on the impact of ULEZ charge on emissions? If real data (as opposed to models) is not yet available, when will it be available?
  3. what is the money from the ULEZ charge going to be used for?
AnyoneButAnton · 28/04/2019 08:37

The last question is very simple: any surplus is pumped into public transport via TFL (which is a non-profit making body).

AnyoneButAnton · 28/04/2019 09:04

And the first and second are answered here, but you’ll have to dig. I don’t know whether climate change impact was part of the ULEZ assessment because that’s not its purpose. NB that slightly older diesel cars do not have to be scrapped. They can be sold second hand to locations where their use is appropriate. Occasional users could keep their car and pay the fine, just as I’ve kept my petrol car and pay the congestion charge once or twice a year rather than replace it with an exempt electric car. And you don’t need to buy a new car to replace it: a ten year old petrol car will do fine.

consultations.tfl.gov.uk/environment/ultra-low-emission-zone/

RicStar · 28/04/2019 09:23

I am not anti the ulez but I think it's not a huge deal yet given the concessions to residents. Its very unclear to me how the expanded zone will work. Currently very wealthy residents of the inner zone have had a 2 year grace period - will this apply to the outer zone? There are cameras in place in the inner zone but not in the outer - how much will this cost? Even the inner zone not all roads are covered as they are using the congestion infrastructure as far as I am aware so it is about entering the zone. Surely it's not going to be possible to cover every road / junction in the expanded zone so will short journeys in the new zone, which should be targeted actually be captured? Will you have to pay for a parked car in the zone? I think until any of the detail is worked out /published how effective the zone/s will be is unclear.

Anonymousmamasita · 28/04/2019 11:38

The term "non-binary" absolutely infuriates me! You physically can't be anything but male or female! I understand transgender, but non-binary seems to be this days new trend! Opinions on "non-binary"?

AnyoneButAnton · 28/04/2019 13:20

I don’t think residents of the expanded ULEZ are currently planned to get any extra grace period. Everybody, inner or outer, gets 3 years notice to change their car if necessary.

As for enforcement I think the plan is to co-opt existing ANPR cameras and add a few more (including mobile ones) around the edge and to fill in obvious gaps. It won’t be like the CC zone where you will definitely get caught if you cross the border and almost certainly caught you drive inside the zone - if there isn’t a camera on your street then you’ll be able to move your car to a more convenient parking spot and a few people might be able to do a school run on back roads without getting snapped.

GabsAlot · 28/04/2019 16:21

my dh who works in the city says the amount of cars is still high-he gets pt

he hasnt noticed a differrence traffic everywhere-people just pay it

UnPocoLoco2 · 28/04/2019 18:14

@ChardonnaysPrettySister he is part of the government and part of the problem

ChardonnaysPrettySister · 28/04/2019 18:21

No, he's not.

He's part of the local government, elected separately to the parliamentary elections. He's accountable to the London Assembly.

Rosti1981 · 28/04/2019 20:19

No but I'd like to know what modelling was done, what the expectation was re what was anticipated that people driving non-exempt cars were likely to do? And although not the purpose of the ULEZ exercise, it will have repercussions on other things (e.g. traffic being pushed elsewhere, or people choosing to replace their cars, all behaviours that do have an impact whether positively or negatively)- so my question is really about the models and how sophisticated they were, what factors were considered, what behaviour changes were anticipated and what the impact of these might be (including on larger scale environmental impact)?

Hope that makes sense. I'm not anti or pro ULEZ, just wanting to find out more. And as I say, I was actually flabbergasted that our 2001 petrol car seems to be exempt?!!! (I just checked it out of interest, I never drive into the centre!)

PaintBySticker · 29/04/2019 07:39

The number of commenters who completely disregard the lifelong impact of air pollution on children’s lungs astounds me. You apparently care about poor van drivers but not about poor children??

WorkingItOutAsIGo · 29/04/2019 07:48

No. But we live in London. And we know how politicians love to create a ‘crisis’ that has an easy solution so they can wave a magic wand and fix it and get all the credit. In the meantime they ignore things which are harder to fix. Trump is doing it with opioids. People are doing it with period poverty. And the Mayor is doing it with this. Takes so much less effort than knife crime. So much less effort than tunnelling roads. Investing in public transport. Investing in infrastructure for electric cars. Easy to put a tax on motorists and who cares that millions of cars will have to be replaced? The rest of the country isn’t going to have space for all the four year old diesels we have to get rid of!

PaintBySticker · 29/04/2019 08:27

I live in London too. Why assume I don’t. I have young children and I care about the quality of air they breathe. Of course I care about knife crime too but I don’t see how introducing the ULEZ or not has anything to do with rates of knife crime.

Vulpine · 29/04/2019 09:21

Working it out - there already is infrastructure for electric cars in place. Pollution and knife crime both need to be tackled. This is a great start. London is a great city to get around by bike. Thats also a good start rather than whining on about poor car drivers

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread