Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post by Caroline Criado Perez: “For parents in particular, Brexit represents a crossroads”

41 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 28/02/2019 14:32

Summer 2016 feels like a long time ago doesn’t it? Prince had just died, the Olympics were unfolding in Rio and… the United Kingdom had just voted to leave the European Union.

Fast forward three years and the promises made by the Leave campaign are in tatters. Theresa May has spent three years negotiating a Withdrawal Agreement that has nothing at all to say about our future relationship with the EU, and which she can’t pass through Parliament anyway. With less than thirty days to go, we have no idea how, when and under what terms we will leave the EU.

The uncertainty over Brexit is already hitting hard: the price of butter has gone up 32% since 2016 and yet wages have remained stagnant. With women - particularly those on low incomes - often responsible for managing household budgets, these costs hit them first, especially since history shows that we tend to try to shield our families from the worst by going without ourselves.

And women have already been going without for long enough. The House of Commons library estimates that women shouldered 86% of austerity cuts: it is women who are more likely to leave paid work to fill the care gap; it is women who are overrepresented in precarious and low-paid employment. 900,000 of our jobs are at risk from a no deal Brexit, while the medicines and fresh foods we rely on could be hit by shortages.

As for May’s so-called deal, within the paltry 26 pages the government has dedicated to the hand-waving Political Declaration there is no mention of women’s rights at all. These will be left entirely at the whim of future governments.

And that’s a worry, because the UK has a track record of fighting the EU all the way as it drags us kicking and screaming (sometimes through the courts) towards implementing anti-discrimination laws on equal pay, part-time workers’ rights and maternity leave. And these EU-driven rights have been incredibly important for women. They have been used to improve employment standards, propel gender equality and redistribute the amount of unpaid care work women often do.

For parents in particular, Brexit represents a crossroads.

If we leave the EU the problems begin from birth: 7,000 nurses and midwives have already left since 2016 while 7% of care workers are EEA nationals. Without Freedom of Movement or sufficient citizens’ rights guarantees, why would our midwives and nursery workers stay? As our children grow up their universities could receive less funding and they will have less freedom to travel, work, live - and love - around Europe.

Meanwhile, the EU will be busy implementing new laws - agreed on in January 2019 - that give parents more rights to work in a flexible way that reflects the reality of the 21st century family.

There are those who claim we don’t need the EU to ensure workers’ rights - after all, what is to stop us from instituting these laws on our own? These people are living in the past. In this increasingly globalised world, individual countries find it much harder to stand up to huge multinational corporations in defence of workers’ rights. Witness Amazon simply backing out of opening an HQ in New York when it started to be quizzed on allowing its workers to unionise. It will instead open an HQ in Washington where no such awkward questions were raised. And bear in mind that with a GDP of $1.5 trillion, New York is one of the world’s twenty largest economies. It is only working as part of a bloc that we have any chance at all against such enormous corporations.

The reality is that women, particularly mothers, ethnic minority women and economically disadvantaged women will be disproportionately impacted by a Brexit of any kind. And we haven’t had a proper say. Women are overwhelmingly underrepresented in the Brexit debate: only one woman was sent to Brussels as part of the senior negotiating team and while in Parliament male MPs hogged a staggering 90% of debate time on Brexit. This Brexit, however it manifests, does not represent us.

Luckily, there is another option.

We have the opportunity to stand up for a different future for women, for children and for Britain. A People’s Vote would allow women to have their say on what we want our future to look like. You wouldn’t buy a house without checking the contract first - and you wouldn’t be forced to buy a house you’d made an offer on if the survey came back and told you it was about to fall down. That’s all a People’s Vote is: the opportunity to have our voices heard on the biggest political decision of a generation, now that we know what Brexit actually means.

The truth is that we will not get a better deal for women than we already have in the EU. And now that we know what the true impact of Brexit will be, we deserve a final say. If you agree, join our campaign to fight for our future.

Register here to join us on the Put It To The People March on 23/03/19.

Caroline Criado Perez will be back at 1pm on 01/03/2019 to answer your questions

OP posts:
TheABB · 02/03/2019 07:44

Seen the no-deal Brexit guidance on food for school meals in England, issued by the Department for Education last month? The guidance suggests that there are “significant flexibilities within the school food standards,” to accommodate change.

www.gov.uk/government/publications/eu-exit-no-deal-preparations-for-schools-in-england/eu-exit-no-deal-preparations-for-schools-in-england

No more funding but higher food costs expected, means Heads will have to find the cash or we accept cheaper quality meals. How much more will they be expected to find from budgets already in the red, when food costs go up from April? Can't see likely outcome except worsening food quality.

www.ifs.org.uk/publications/9562

Peregrina · 02/03/2019 08:29

Did Leavers really vote for all this? To see their children worse fed; to see the NHS sold off? I wish they would be brave and said that they made a mistake, instead of doggedly telling us that the unicorns are coming and are just round the corner.

bellinisurge · 02/03/2019 08:33

But I'm not sure that the lecturing and, dare I say it, rather patronising tone of the op helps. Or tells us anything new.
If the op thinks that telling everyone about how families in poverty will be adversely affected by Brexit is a new notion to MN then they haven't been paying attention. If the op thinks the gender pay gap is a new notion to MN, they haven't been paying attention.
I'm a Remain voter who whole heartedly agrees that Brexit will negatively affect the poorest most and will particularly affect women but I find the original post preachy and unoriginal, conflating as it does all our country's woes and blaming them on Brexit.

bellinisurge · 02/03/2019 08:44

I'm sorry op but I think you need to say this to a less well informed crowd.

Leighhalfpennysthigh · 02/03/2019 09:29

But this looks at one aspect of brexit - a group of people.who are undeniably affected

It is sexist and patronising to use examples like the price of butter or young people not being able to work in Europe in a post just about how women are affected, that's my point.

We are all affected by rising costs of food.

We are all affected by freedom of movement

We are all affected by the problems in the NHS

We will all be affected by food shortages and lack of trade deals and all the other things that a no deal Brexit will impose on us.

It's not whaboutery, it is reminding this op that Brexit has far reaching effects on society. To reduce it to individual groups diminishes the impact.

Leighhalfpennysthigh · 02/03/2019 09:31

By stopping freedom of movement

Peregrina · 02/03/2019 09:43

But some of us are more affected. Theresa May and chums aren't going to suffer too much with rising prices. Those 'Just about Managings' that she professed to care for are likely to be pushed over the edge into not managing.

Leighhalfpennysthigh · 02/03/2019 13:33

But some of us are more affected

Yes. But some people are more affected. Not just a random group of people who have reproduced and are female as Implied in this post.

bellinisurge · 02/03/2019 14:23

This is a lot of why I voted Remain. It didn't work. It didn't convince. Why would it do that now?

NicoAndTheNiners · 03/03/2019 18:02

I'm pretty sure the price of butter was zooming up before brexit. Not sure that you can blame brexit for the price surge.

I really wish we could have a second vote but I fear a no deal crash out is more likely.

tartantroosers · 04/03/2019 01:06

Exceptionally poor piece of writing. Patronising, facile and narrow-minded. I'd give you a. D+. Must try harder next time

InfiniteSheldon · 04/03/2019 08:03

What a patronising sexist load of rubbish OP

betteristhebutter · 04/03/2019 10:54

Butter. Fucking brilliant. Cos we're all barefoot in the kitchen making our kids sandwiches.

Come back when you can write something less patronising.

NicoAndTheNiners · 04/03/2019 15:07

Also I thought that milk was one of the few things we produce enough of in this country. So dairy products are unlikely to be affected by brexit, not to that extent anyway.

FriarTuck · 04/03/2019 17:06

The main impact that Brexit has had on me is being inundated with utter bollocks like this.

SomethingOnce · 04/03/2019 17:38

The country is already divided -- the 2016 referendum did that.

Um, no. The division in the country, specifically the division arising from the distribution of wealth, resulted in the outcome of the referendum.

If you thought there was no division pre-2016 then you’re probably part of the problem, tbh.

And this newly announced money for the regions is too little, too late.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread