Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

Guest post: "I tracked down my birth mother, but didn't tell her who I was"

60 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 27/06/2016 16:55

I was four years old when I was adopted from the orphanage I'd been left at as a baby. My new parents told me my birth parents had died ­but I was somehow convinced my mother was still alive.

Being part of a 'proper' family wasn’t how I had imagined it; my adoptive mother had wanted me as a 'sister' for her daughter and struggled to show me any real affection, while my sister was quickly jealous of any attention I received at home. When I finished school, I trained as a nurse, married and started a new life of my own, but I still wanted to know the truth about my birth parents. I still felt as though my own life story was unfinished.

In 1979, after some help from local authorities, my mother, Bridget, was found. She was alive and amazingly lived only three miles from me in Birmingham. Known locally as 'Tipperary Mary', she was using her middle name to avoid detection from the police. She was an eccentric character – and also an alcoholic. I was delighted to know that she really was alive, as I'd always believed, and I had expected her life to be complicated.

Isn't that why she gave me up? I wasn't shocked. I met people in all sorts of situations through my job as a nurse, and I had learned not to judge, but there was still a part of me that, despite longing to meet her, was more than a little nervous about what she might be like.

I decided that my training could be the key to me coping with such an emotional situation. My ability to switch on a professional attitude might help me to deal with whatever meeting my mother could bring. In 1981 I had my first baby, a boy. I decided that when I returned to work as a district nurse, I would (unofficially) add Bridget to my rounds, as a gentle way of getting to know her. I would be able to use my job as a reason to visit.

The first time I knocked on her door I was sweating with anxiety and trying to keep calm. Before I had time to change my mind, there she stood. I couldn't believe it. I was staring into the face of my mother. I was determined to recognise her and searched her face for some similarity, some sign of myself. I thought I could see some likeness -­ the cheekbones perhaps, the way she tilted her chin.

Half of her face was swollen and badly bruised, and her left eye was black. Her hair was grey and smelled of stale alcohol and tobacco. She was wearing a semi­transparent, short, nylon nightdress and her fingernails were filthy.

The way she looked was a clear indication of the chaos that her life was in. I wanted to know more about her, spend more time with her, ask her questions – but there were warning bells ringing in my head. I had a young family of my own, and this woman was not in a position to just slot into a 'normal' family life.

I cleaned her up, treated her bruises, and told her I'd be back soon. As I was leaving, Bridget stroked my hair and attempted to move it from my eyes, the type of thing a mother might do. She seemed affectionate towards me. Maybe it was because I took the time to listen to her but we somehow seemed to make a connection. Maybe, somewhere deep down, she recognised me?

I wanted to tell her who I was, but I kept thinking of my little boy at home and I couldn't do it. I was glad I seemed to be important to her, though. For better or worse, at last, I had finally met my mother.

Over the next nine years, I continued to take her clean clothes, bathe her wounds and listen to her talk about the five children she had given away, including me, when I was eight months old. Alcohol completely controlled her life; she was tortured by her past. I felt no anger towards her at all. She did what she felt was best for us, and for her.

I was a mum of three, though, and I couldn't let Bridget disrupt my family. I couldn't let the chaos of her life into my own. She wasn't the fairy tale figure I had imagined, but she was still my mother.

Eventually, in 1989, knowing her health was deteriorating, I finally told her the truth. I told her that I hadn't told her earlier because I felt the time wasn't right. I knew that time was slipping away from us and that although we'd got to know each other, she still didn’t know who I truly was – or that I was OK. That she had done the right thing.

But Bridget just stared silently at me. She was in the early stages of dementia and I'd left it too late. There never would be a right moment now. I'd lost the mother I'd found, and I was devastated. I continued to see her, but her condition became worse, she became more difficult to deal with – and she died in 2003. Although I had stayed with her for as long as I could, and continued to care for her, she died never knowing I was her daughter.

Phyllis Whitsell's story is told in her book, Finding Tipperary Mary. We have one copy to give away on Twitter, find us on @MumsnetBloggers to enter before Monday July 4.

OP posts:
Italiangreyhound · 29/06/2016 10:47

Re the phrase judgement on me... I cannot see any judgement in this story at all from the point of the blogger.

A child whose mother or father has given then up for adoption is not the same as a person whose sibling was given up for adoption or who was given up for adoption when their sibling was not.

When a parent relinquishes a child they give up the right to know where that child is. The child has the choice to tell or not to tell. Not telling someone something is not the same as lying.

I do not think I would have done things the way that Phyllis Whitsell did but I am not a person who was relinquished as a baby or child.

The only judgement I can see here are posters who cannot seem to put themselves into the bloggers shoes.

WannaBe · 29/06/2016 11:08

fa too many people live in a world they perceive to be black and white. As I said upthread, it's very easy to sit on the sidelines and talk of abuse of power and needing to be struck off etc. But the world just isn't that black and white. It just isn't. Nobody can possibly know what it must be like to grow up in the knowledge you were given up for adoption, and to then be faced with the possibility of finding the person who gave you up unless you have been there.

Batteriesallgone · 29/06/2016 11:08

Whether or not things were different then, I think it is morally wrong to use your position to get access in this way, and I am glad the RCN code of conduct reflects that. If it did not I would still regard it as abuse of position. I would hope any other professional body would too.

Regarding my point about judgement - she knew her mother was an alcoholic with a chaotic lifestyle who she deemed unfit to be introduced to her children, that sounds very much as though she formed a judgement. I do think she used her professional access to come to a judgement about this woman.

No I have not been in her shoes but the very fact it is such a difficult emotive situation is the reason why it should be kept seperate from her role as a nurse. Mixing personal and professional in this way is wrong.

CoteDAzur · 29/06/2016 13:34

I'm sorry but I am also finding it hard to swallow that fact that you used your position to enter her life, withheld information from her that could truly enrich her life in her final years and make her happy, and now you are benefiting from it all by publishing a book.

hollyisalovelyname · 29/06/2016 13:43

I'm with Bombardier.
I think it's such a wonderful thing to do.
Well done.
PC gone mad with some of the comments.

R0078 · 29/06/2016 13:45

I am adopted and I found my birth Mother too...it was not a fairy tale either..Interesting to read this book x

MidnightVelvetthe5th · 29/06/2016 13:52

I hope finding her has given you some peace Phyllis.

I can see why you took those actions, I don't see any judgement on her lifestyle from you there. All of us who are parents & have read this will know that we all allow some people into our family life & there are some people we don't invite in, for whatever reason but usually because it won't benefit our family who are our prime concern. Having young children intensifies this.

To those posters who are concerned about the abuse of position, consider that Bridget had an alcohol addiction in part to help her cope with the choices she made and the way her life turned out. If the OP had appeared on the doorstep declaring who she is & Bridget was suddenly faced with a living embodiment of decisions she regretted, she may not have been able to cope & her mental health may have suffered drastically. Having lived with an alcoholic myself, I can assure you that Bridget's first reaction would be to drink herself unconscious because that would be preferable to dealing with the situation. Its very unlikely that she would have been delighted, so Phyllis would have been rejected a second time & Bridget would have even more demons to fight & now they were not only in her head but also on her doorstep in real life.

By taking this course of action Phyllis was able to safeguard & care for her birth mother in a way that her mother never did for her. The roles were reversed & in this way Phyllis was able to heal a little & Bridget was looked after a little.

Phyllis I hope that on some level Bridget did realise who you were & was glad that you made a success of your life in a way that she was never able to Brew Flowers

BrainLikeASeive · 29/06/2016 14:00

Makes me wonder if I should track down my father and 3 half brothers. I've got 3 little children of my own now. Do I owe it to them to find their family? Not sure...

Mycatsabastard · 29/06/2016 14:46

Brain I was contacted by my half sister just before Christmas several years ago, I'm in my 40's and although I knew of her existence I had no information to go on. She found me.

It's been difficult in some ways, she was given up for adoption by our mother because she had left her husband after having an affair. The baby (her) was her husbands. The lover gave her the option of him or the baby. She chose him. She then had me and another child. When they both died we were both also put up for adoption. There was another child as well, before my older sister. He was mixed race and in the 60's that was an untenable position for my mother who was forced into giving him up. I haven't managed to find him although I have his birth certificate.

My half sister and I have met and are meeting again. We talk occasionally but we don't have the bond I have with my younger sister who has always been in my life if not in my family iyswim (adopted separately). There was bitterness on her side because she was given up and we weren't. That she never got to meet her mum but we did (although neither of us can remember her). She has, however, found her father and has two half siblings there too and she has formed a good relationship with them all which I'm happy about.

I think we have one of the most complicated families on the planet but I'm glad I have met her and I hope that before I die I find my brother as well.

Givemestrengthorwine · 29/06/2016 16:09

How sad, but how beautiful! 😢💐 x

coffeecup16 · 29/06/2016 18:12

I adopted a child at birth and I find the fact that this lady used her position to gain access , totally inappropriate and frightening . I understand everything she says but it was completely dishonest and morally wrong . If someone did this to us - I would be very angry indeed . She should have written to her - and been up front

TheRealAdaLovelace · 29/06/2016 18:59

sorry if I sound miserable but gaining access to a vulnerable woman for personal reasons thro your professional position is just wrong.

WannaBe · 29/06/2016 19:25

People do realise that it was the adopted child who gained access to her mother and not the other way around?

Bearing in mind, even if OP had gone through conventional channels to find this information, only she would have been allowed access to it and not the other way around. Anyone can trace their adopted parents and would then be able to introduce themselves as they felt fit without those people knowing who they were.

If, say, the OP had been given her file and traced her mother that way and had instead started drinking at the same pub as her, or joined the woman's group she belonged to and offered her the same level of support would people still say this was wrong?

Doyouthinktheysaurus · 29/06/2016 19:27

Unfortunately as an RMN I can only echo that it feels like an abuse of your position and therefore, very wrong. As registered nurses we do have a strict code of professional conduct we must adhere to and that is ultimately to protect our client group who care often extremely vulnerable.

I am pleased you met your mum and I hope it has bought you some peace to know you helped her but I genuinely don't think you should have used your professional status in that way. You could have made contact as a concerned neighbour/ member of the community and supported her in a similar way without compromising your professional integrity.

coffeecup16 · 29/06/2016 19:41

WannaBe, the point is completely irrelevant

Batteriesallgone · 29/06/2016 19:52

WannaBe it's totally different.

If someone approaches me in the pub my response to them is totally different to someone in a nurses uniform knocking on my door.

Much like if someone sat next to me at a bus stop and started chatting to me my response would be totally different to being approached by a uniformed policeman at that same bus stop.

We trust nurses, doctors, policemen way more than ordinary members of the public. If we didn't they would struggle to do their jobs. A vulnerable person may talk to their community nurse about how many children they've given up, which would not be information they would want the general public to know, let alone one of the children that was adopted. Who knows what information will be in this book that 'Tipperary Mary' would not otherwise have divulged, if it were not for the fact she felt she was in a private conversation with a caring but ultimately 'distanced' individual who wouldn't do anything with or likely even remember the conversation.

mamadoc · 29/06/2016 21:40

Sits badly with me too I'm afraid.

Some things actually do need to be black and white NOT a shade of grey and professional standards are one of those things.

Rules exist for a reason to protect vulnerable people from abuse. Actually both parties here were vulnerable.

Mary was deceived and that is not OK for whatever benign intent. It is no more justifiable to lie to an elderly alcoholic lady than to anyone else. It is disrespectful. However bad her choices were she had a right to make them and she had her choice eg to decline contact taken away by this deception. It diminishes elderly mentally ill people and other vulnerable people in society to patronise them and take away their choices like this and it leaves them open to abuse if we condone this.

OP was also psychologically vulnerable. It is likely she crossed professional boundaries. All professionals are advised not to treat family members because your judgement is inevitably clouded in that scenario. She risked her career and livelihood and presumably she had to lie about this over many years.

It's not alright by me.

mamadoc · 29/06/2016 21:42

I'm actually disappointed in mumsnet for posting this blog as it feels like condoning something which is clearly wrong to me.

Partybagger · 29/06/2016 22:02

This isn't really about the issues around the adoption, it's about the issue of trust in caring professionals and their respect for the autonomy of their patients.

I find this story disturbing, because mixing personal and professional issues is a clear line that has been purposely crossed.

The patient's trust in her nurse was based on the patient's reasonable expectation of a professional (and also caring) relationship.

TheRealAdaLovelace · 29/06/2016 22:23

" People do realise that it was the adopted child who gained access to her mother and not the other way around "

How does that make it OK? The mother had her right to privacy abused.

ExtraHotLatteToGo · 30/06/2016 08:25

So, this elderly, alcoholic, suffering with dementia etc woman was cared for, and cared about, by a woman who just happened to be her daughter, when she had been otherwise left in an unkept state without clean clothes, personal hygiene attended to and lonely...and the woman doing the caring is the one in the wrong.

What the hell is our society coming to that people think it's worse that she wasn't told it was her daughter than it was to be left in that state? Professional bodies need to spend less time getting everyone wound up over petty shite and concentrate far more on the actual care people need.

Kr1stina · 30/06/2016 08:28

Here are some of the professional responsibilities of a nurse ( and any HCP)

Respecting the autonomy of the patient

Acting in the best interests of the patient

Respecting patient confidentiality

This nurse has breached all of these in a serious way . Her motives for doing so and her own past are largely irrelevant . The fact that she is a biological relative of " Mary " doesn't take away Mary's rights .

CoteDAzur · 30/06/2016 08:29

"So, this elderly, alcoholic, suffering with dementia etc woman was cared for, and cared about, by a woman who just happened to be her daughter, when she had been otherwise left in an unkept state without clean clothes, personal hygiene attended to and lonely"

Err no. Another nurse would be sent in her place.

Have you missed the part in the OP where she says "I decided that when I returned to work as a district nurse, I would (unofficially) add Bridget to my rounds".

Batteriesallgone · 30/06/2016 08:31

What the hell is our society coming to if the choice is care but stripped of choice and dignity vs no care at all?

hollyisalovelyname · 30/06/2016 09:38

Cote D'Azure in an ideal world 'another nurse would be sent in her place.'
If her birth mother was in the state Phyliss says she was in she must not have been on Social Services radar.
Or perhaps resources were limited ?