Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

Guest post: "I am an attachment parent because of my feminism, not in spite of it"

79 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2015 15:14

There's a pervading myth about 'Attachment Parents': that we're mostly evangelical and exclusionary, and that we believe there is only one set of rules for decent, wholesome parents to follow. Parenting practises closely associated with AP (babywearing, breastfeeding, bedsharing) all provoke much tortured discussion, too.

Attachment parenting is often said to place huge demands on new mothers (‘how can you ever have a minute to yourself!’ friends have exclaimed) - but I am an attachment parent because I am a feminist, not in spite of it. You may disagree, but I believe that attachment parenting is the most genuinely feminist ‘parenting philosophy’ out there.

It puts the mother first. It recognises how important the role of mother is, and it encourages women to do what feels right for them. It's about getting motherhood truly recognised as an important sphere, not a relegation role or something people do when real life isn't happening. What's more, there's no checklist etched onto the clubhouse door - AP is for anyone who wants to follow their instincts when parenting.

There are those who argue that motherhood shouldn't be put on a pedestal: that the idea that a mother has a unique relationship with her child is regressive; that it puts too much pressure on women, or excludes fathers, or discourages co-parenting. It's not very trendy, when politicians are busy discussing how we can get more women back to work and share the 'burden' of childcare more evenly with men, to argue for an emphasis on the instinctive relationship between mother and child.

It is important, though, because the role of primary care-giver has been undervalued in society in recent history, to women's detriment. Motherhood is held up as the most virtuous and self-sacrificing of roles, but also the lowest in the ranks simultaneously. Our politicians tell us they want to get women back into the workplace after having children, but rather than championing ways for that to happen whilst also honouring the importance of the primary caregiver's role, we're told that cheaper childcare is the only way forward, devaluing our labour again.

Attachment parenting, then, is political. But I also think it's important for emotional wellbeing, too. New parents are continually told about what is dangerous and prohibited. In every aspect of parenting, mothers go against what feels right – and what's easiest for them, more importantly – because it's ‘not what the book said,’ and self-doubt abounds. I wish I'd had someone there, with my first child, to tell me, 'you're not a terrible mother because your child sleeps in your bed'.

Contrary to telling women what to do, attachment parenting takes no stance on how parents should feed, sleep with (or not), carry (or not) or birth their babies. Instead, it advocates for better information to be made available to all parents and parents-to-be about all of their options. It wants women to have the best experience possible in their mothering, and wants us to be free to listen to ourselves.

Of course, no sensible AP advocate would encourage a woman to go against good medical advice - but women, and their mothering instinct, should be given more authority. Whether it's in labour or in the first weeks after birth, women should be treated with dignity - like people who know their own bodies, instead of just observers in their bodies’ processes.

Attachment parenting does what society doesn't: it tells women to take their time in easing into motherhood, to make their children’s infancy as relaxed as possible (for them and for their kids) and to just – if possible – take some time out. This doesn't necessarily mean time away from a beloved career or from your friends - it means just going easy on yourself, letting your body do its thing and making room to discover the new little person in your life without fear about doing this or that right.

Mothers matter – whether they are at home or at work full time outside of the home, whether they breastfeed, or co-sleep or babywear or none of the above. No one needs to prove themselves ‘mum enough’ at any point to make parent-child attachment at the forefront of their parenting.

OP posts:
Mintyy · 18/03/2015 19:08

Ha! yes, trying to find some rhyme or reason in those illogical little screaming, spewing, non-sleeping creatures. Spent months doing it MI. A la David.

thehumanjam · 18/03/2015 19:17

Why do people think that everything they do including the way that they parent their children is of interest to anybody else? It's not it's boring.

OddFodd · 18/03/2015 19:28

I've wondered about who/why on the guest posts too.

I agree with most of the other posters. I'm not sure how AP aligns with feminism at all.

My instinct was to go back to work and regain my sense of 'me'. Not very AP but bugger all to do with my feminism.

And totally agree with mintyy that all the APers I know have mutated into 'ordinary' mothers as their children have grown up, with no discernable difference in their children or their parenting.

The one thing that I do agree with the guest poster on is that nurturing/caring are terribly undervalued in our society. But that isn't just about caring for children - it's all care (for children, disabled, elderly) because it's a traditionally female occupation. Nothing to do with AP though!

Crazyqueenofthecatladies · 18/03/2015 19:38

Agree with others that AP is very much a prescriptive philosophy. As for its links with feminism, only very very tangentially so, largely through women now having careers. I think the rise of parenting perfectionism has definitely coincided with most mothers returning to work within a year, because such child centred parent martyring techniques are only practical if you only see your kid for 1-2 hours a day. Done 24-7 for years they would grind you down utterly. Most sahms seem to get their parenting edges knocked off them rather more and resort to rather lower expectations more like 70s and 80s parenting, which was largely a sahm affair. But the utter AP devotees I know all work full time, and perhaps use this method as a punishment, or perhaps because perfection is possible in 1-2 hour stints.

Enormouse · 18/03/2015 19:46

humanjam Grin I guess it's because kids, by and large, are awkward, difficult little sods so when you find something that works its like a huge revelation you have to share with everyone.

Only like you say, it's dull, it's been done before and has been rebranded with a catchy new name. Only now the people who want to shout about it have twitter or blogs.

Not cynical at all

IfNotNowThenWhen · 18/03/2015 19:47

The only attachment parent I have known was very scathing about women going back to work ft and " not raising their own children". She had nothing to say about her husband working full time, probably as he conveniently paid the mortgage.
I didn't know anything about AP when I met her (pre mn days) and I was a bit bewildered by the fact that there was a very obvious code to the way she and her friends did things.
Cots were a no no, slings were used but not baby carriers, playpens were evil. Children were weaned on finger foods, mushing stuff and spoon feeding was wrong. Beast feeding until 2 was compulsory.
Like most people I did a miss mash of things, some co sleeping, finger foods etc, but not others. To say Ap is not prescriptive is bollocks. It seems incredibly rigid in its dos and don't s.
I don't want to be revered, or martyred because I am a woman who happens to have given birth at some point, and is, like most adults in the world, bringing up a child.
I want equal pay, shared parental leave, promotion opportunities, workplace crèches, an end to violence against women, that's what makes me feminist , not whether I used a playpen or not.

Ubik1 · 18/03/2015 19:49

Just do whatever

They still won't tidy their bedrooms when you tell them to.

Enormouse · 18/03/2015 19:57

I'm not sure what message these MN posts are sending collectively. The last one by Esther walker about feeding children had martyrish overtones too.

bigkidsdidit · 18/03/2015 20:03

MI you get a card?? I don't have my feminist card yet Envy

26Point2Miles · 18/03/2015 20:31

My friend has gone as far as she can with the baby stage so she's now gone on to doing home schooling and taking her dc out barefoot.... Where does this end?

PlentyOfPubeGardens · 18/03/2015 20:49

Another one here who is increasingly Hmm about these 'guest posts'.

  • Who are these people? Who invites them and why? What are the criteria?
  • What's the basic aim of having guest posts on MN at all?
  • What is the understanding wrt responses? Are guest posters encouraged to read our comments and respond?
  • How much input does MNHQ have in these posts? Titles? Standfirsts? Editing suggestions? Images? Sometimes, as in this one, the post gives out extremely mixed messages.

There have been a few 'guest posts' lately that, if posted by a normal MNer, would probably be reported as post-and-run goadiness.

There's a lot in this post that I could comment on, both positive and negative, but I don't think I'll bother as I don't trust the format.

Karmalaa · 18/03/2015 21:07

I learnt about AP whilst pregnant. I practice a lot of it, co sleeping, baby wearing, breastfeeding etc. I agree with the OP and find it thoroughly empowering, in the early days it gave me permission to follow my instincts and not get hung up on "shoulds" 6 months in and I feel more and more confident each day that I'm doing what's best for me, my family and my child. I'm proud to be feminist and AP.

Everyone is different, some mothers need their own time and space, some want or need to return to work, some don't. No good comes from judging another parents choices, if you dont agree with AP then don't practice it. Easy as that.

IfNotNowThenWhen · 18/03/2015 21:15

I couldn't give a stuff if other people practice AP. But, ime AP people are highly judgmental of mothers (not fathers as they don't seem to enter into it much) who do not practice 100% lentil weavery.
Spoon feeding, for example, becomes " taking the control from the child and encouraging overeating".
(Ok, Maybe weaning is not technically an AP thing, but blw does seem to be part of the AP package).
Playpens are "cages" and prams are " Satan's GoKarts".
Ok fine, I made the last one up

Heckler · 18/03/2015 21:17

Women and their mothering instinct?

Perleaase.

How that statement can be linked to feminism I am not sure.

Heckler · 18/03/2015 21:18

And MotherInferior, loving your Attenborough comments. That did make me giggle.

motherinferior · 18/03/2015 21:20

I was just about to say the same as Heckler.

I am a woman. I have two daughters. That does not define me. There are a lot of other things in my life, apart from parenthood. And I like it that way.

TondelayoSchwarzkopf · 18/03/2015 21:22

To paraphrase Churchill "if you're not attachment parenting a 6 week old then you have no heart. If you're attachment parenting a 6 year old then you have no brain."

motherinferior · 18/03/2015 21:25

The more I think about this the crosser I'm getting. A huge part of the feminist struggle has been to define ourselves separate from our reproductive capacities - as a hell of a lot more than Sacred Mothers, as Bad Women, mouthy women, women with brains and inconvenient demands for a share of the economic and political pie.

Kampeki · 18/03/2015 21:27

I really don't think it's helpful to label people as particular types of parent. We all do what feels like the right thing at the time.

I had never heard of AP when dd was a baby, but I breastfed until she was nearly three, co-slept for a lot longer, never left her to cry and generally followed my instincts. However, dd let me know when she was a baby that she had no intention of ever being "worn", and I went back to work when she was six months because I wanted to retain my career. Where the heck do I fit in?

LonnyVonnyWilsonFrickett · 18/03/2015 21:28

The thinking in this piece is so muddied I can't even be bothered answering any of the points so I will concur with pps and say 'who is writing this stuff?'

I find any 'school' of parenting to be anti-feminist tbh, as they are all predicated on saying a certain way of mothering (and it always is mothering) is better than another. That's the antithesis of feminism to me.

motherinferior · 18/03/2015 21:35

It's the school of "I consider myself to be a feminist (although I don't necessarily know what I mean by this) and I'm following this course of action so that makes it a feminist" thinking. Or perhaps I should say "thinking".

Also the "feminism is about women and mothers are women so this is feminist" false equation.

PlentyOfPubeGardens · 18/03/2015 21:41

I've done a post on Site Stuff.

Enormouse · 18/03/2015 21:45

MI I think you've hit the nail on the head there. Totally agree with you.

IHeartKingThistle · 18/03/2015 21:49

I just really struggle with the unwritten assumption that the 'attachment' comes FROM the co - sleeping , baby - wearing, breast- feeding. Who decided that was how to create a bond?

I sleep trained my babies and I went back to work. I bloody adore my children. They love me back and they tell me their worries. We are well and truly attached. I didn't need to suffer years of sleep deprivation to achieve that bond because they are mine and they are loved and they know it.

26Point2Miles · 18/03/2015 21:52

These posts seem to be from 'bloggers'.... MN bloggers in the MN blogger section.

Why do they creep into active convos? Surely if we wanted to read endless blogs banging I about the days agenda then we would head to the loggers section?

Swipe left for the next trending thread