Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

Guest post from Nick Clegg: 'This is a watershed moment in the fight for a family-friendly Britain'

96 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 13/03/2014 16:09

It’s not often that government legislation kick starts a revolution. Yet our Children and Families Act, which has just received Royal Assent, does just that. It takes us another important step closer to ensuring the more family-friendly Britain that Mumsnet and Mumsnetters have been campaigning for for years.

This is a watershed moment. Every dot and comma of the Bill puts into law measures that will transform outdated attitudes and systems in Britain. We want to give families like yours more freedom and flexibility to make the choices you want and ensure every child gets the best possible start in life.

So now, thanks to these changes, our parental leave system will no longer be built on the 1950s assumption that when a child is born, mum stays home while dad goes out to work. We want to ensure that fewer women feel like they have to choose between their family and career and that more men can spend the extra time they want with their kids.

And, now, if you’re a parent who wants to give your children the best care and opportunities, you’ll have improved access to good, affordable childcare and greater support through extended flexible working. You’ll also have the guarantee of a free healthy meal for your child during those important first years at school.

This is about more than changing laws. It’s about changing a culture that for too long has dictated rather than supported families’ choices.

Take the coalition government’s introduction of shared parental leave for new parents. In the old system, after a child was born, fathers got two weeks for paternity leave and mothers could take up to a year.

But what about the many parents who want to share these traditional roles between them, so they can better meet the needs of their family?

From April 2015, this flagship Liberal Democrat policy will make it possible for new parents to carve up the leave they’re entitled to, with much greater flexibility.

So if you want to return to work before your year’s leave is up or go back to work for a particular project, you can do so without losing out. We want to ensure that all career options remain open to women after pregnancy. Your partner can stay at home and use the rest of the leave and pay, if that’s what they want.

If you choose, you can even take off chunks of time together. Once you return to work, you’ll also be able to benefit from the support of family and friends who want to help out and will have the same right to request flexible working arrangements as you do.

These measures have been pored over by analysts, businesses and the people they impact to ensure they’re easy to understand, implement and use.

We don’t want to create an unnecessary burden, particularly for small businesses. So we've listened and responded to the concerns of business and their feedback has been overwhelmingly positive. Businesses recognise the more diverse, productive and skilled workforce shared parental leave and flexible working can bring. I have seen some excellent examples of family friendly businesses through the Mumsnet Awards. I’d like to see many more in the future.

Above all else, we want a system that works for everyone, and one of the policies that will benefit almost every family with young children is our plan to provide free school meals to pupils in reception classes, year one and year two of primary school from September. Experts have been looking at this policy for years and universal free school meal pilots have shown the genuine difference this can make.

At a time when many are still struggling to make ends meet, it will save families hundreds of pounds per child every year. It’s also been shown to help children do better in English and Maths. On average, pupils in the pilot areas were two months ahead of their peers, with children from poorer backgrounds showing the biggest improvements. Children in the pilot areas were also shown to be more likely to eat vegetables and fewer snacks.

We know this approach helps. That’s why we’re working closely with schools and teachers across the country to meet our September launch.

Building a Britain fit for modern families has been one of my biggest ambitions, and that of the Liberal Democrats, in government. Today takes us another step closer to making that ambition a reality, laying the foundations for our family-friendly revolution.

Together, we’re building a modern Britain we can all be proud of, with a stronger economy and fairer society. So every British family, no matter what their circumstances, can prosper, and every child, whatever their background, can rise as high as their talents and hard work will take them.

OP posts:
georgesdino · 14/03/2014 10:33

Exactly whatsantawillbring. Its 2014 we dont all rely on men. The leave changes are great and real progress.

BoulevardOfBrokenSleep · 14/03/2014 10:33

The shared parental leave is a great plan, it's a shame it's too late for our family, my DH would have loved to have spent some time with the kids as babies.

And an advance for feminism too.

Can someone fill me in on the SEN issue in the act, it's not something I've heard about? Is there a thread?

Alibabaandthe40nappies · 14/03/2014 10:35

This is just so much window dressing.

Boffin what do you mean by 'if everyone has to eat them'? The school lunches will still be optional - we are not living in a dictatorship!

CountessOfRule · 14/03/2014 10:43

Our school is leaning heavily on parents to get as close to 100% uptake as possible. So they might be theoretically optional but in practice it could be awkward to opt out. Logistics and so on.

JGTB · 14/03/2014 13:05

Well done Nick! Ignore the moaners - these are all some really good steps forward you should be proud of and we have to be patient given some of the Tories would rather it was the 1950s!

bordellosboheme · 14/03/2014 13:58

Is this not a little economically deterministic as a policy? What about those of us that want to be 1950s sahms? Are we irrelevant because we're not paying taxes. Why is caring getting squeezed out in the fight for taxes?

StarlightMcKingsThree · 14/03/2014 14:24

In summary, this is how children with SEN have been failed: educationalrightsalliance.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/demand-moratorium-on-children-and.html

StarlightMcKingsThree · 14/03/2014 14:28

Sorry, summary link again educationalrightsalliance.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/demand-moratorium-on-children-and.html

BackOnlyBriefly · 14/03/2014 14:47

Am I reading that right?

Free school meals because most of you are such poor parents that this will make a huge difference to their health and ability to learn. Especially you poor people who never did feed your kids properly.

Not to mention that the school meals are often not especially healthy anyway.

JGTB · 14/03/2014 14:50

bodellosboheme - no, because sahms can carry on being sahms and nothing will change, including how much they are valued - this is just giving all mums more choice

JGTB · 14/03/2014 15:01

BackOnlyBriefly - I am a parent governor at an inner-city school in which most of the kids are NOT fed properly at home and the school does provide healthy meals - for many kids, all three meals of the day. That's why it's a good policy.

Parents who already give their kids healthy meals can a) enjoy saving a few quid and b) put their energies into making sure the meals the school provides are healthy, if they are not already!

BackOnlyBriefly · 14/03/2014 15:18

JGTB, I appreciate that you're thinking in your specific situation that it will help. But do you not think that his remarks were patronising? and ill-informed too given that in many cases school dinners are cheap rubbish and the parent would be better advised to put something healthy in a lunch box.

And why are inner city parents not feeding their children properly? What is the common factor? Is it because they live in a city because I don't see a cause and effect there. Is it because they are Labour voters or could it be because they don't have any money?

HavantGuard · 14/03/2014 15:45

The nearest primary to me has

TheHoneyBadger · 14/03/2014 15:46

i don't know how he has the audacity to even appear in public let alone speak.

you have betrayed and betrayed mr clegg. you've also signed your party's death certificate.

AnnieLobeseder · 14/03/2014 16:41

WhatWillSantaBring - hardly an archaic assumption if the man is still the higher earner in 60% of households. I confess that statistic surprises me (do you have a source?) but is good news if true - perhaps the gap is finally closing.

I assume you mean households where both parents work, however, as by far the majority of SAHPs are still women.

Look, I hope I'm being unnecessarily pessimistic instead of just realistic, but the expectation in business is that women will take time off for children and men won't. Even the change in legislation (which is well overdue - more progressive countries brought it in years ago) won't affect overnight change - there will have to be a gradual shift in perceptions from employers and managers. I hope the trickle of initial intake will quickly turn to a flood, but I doubt it.

expatinscotland · 14/03/2014 16:44

More nonsense from a clueless politician born with a silver spoon in his mouth, no concept of real life for most people and who went back on nearly all his election promises.

Why on Earth anyone entertains a word he says besides whatever comedic value can be derived from it is beyond me.

Doobydoo · 14/03/2014 17:53

Hahaha...what a load of yuck.Be a good start to tell employers that when a MAN takes time out to look after children he is not strange and is still employable when the time is right for HIM to go back to work.
BILGE

georgesdino · 14/03/2014 17:58

I know lots of men waiting to take it. Im really upset its not happening this year

Siennasun · 14/03/2014 21:22

Genuinely can't understand why any parent is complaining about free school meals for their children. School meals (in primary schools anyway) are generally very healthy. Most packed lunches aren't as good as the hot meals provided, which will need to follow nutritional guidelines. Working in schools in deprived areas I have often seen children sent to school with lunch boxes containing just packets of crisps and sweets. Conversely, just because a wealthier family can afford to pay for their child's meals it doesn't necessarily follow that they will provide a healthy packed lunch. This is the best way to ensure all young children get at least one balanced meal per day.
And, if you are strongly opposed to your child receiving said healthy, free school dinner, you can still opt out. No one is losing out here.

Shared parental leave is well overdue. I know a lot of families who will take this up.

SEN provision is a different matter. Children with SEN are already starting to miss out on support they need because of spending cuts and, sadly, it looks like it's only going to get worse.

scottishmummy · 14/03/2014 21:27

Free meals not universally required,it's needless cost.better to target need than universal provision
The complaint (as you call it) is cost incurred,in a tokenistic gesture
If you work in deprived area you'll know that's where need is

BoulevardOfBrokenSleep · 14/03/2014 21:31

Thanks for the links, Starlight - is it that the Bill has failed to make things better, rather than actively making them worse? I thought maybe there was a Bedroom Tax II going on that I hadn't noticed.

WaxyDaisy · 14/03/2014 21:34

I voted Lib Dem last time.

You horrified me by teaming up with the Conservatives.

Then there was tuition fees.

You lied. I will never trust your party again.

TheFabulousIdiot · 14/03/2014 21:38

Is he coming back to answer any of the questions?

I want to know more about the flexible working changes and how SEN kids are going to be effected.

Is there any point asking questions?

Swipe left for the next trending thread