Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Genealogy

Was having several children without being married common (1840s)

31 replies

StripySocksAndDocs · 02/10/2018 09:33

Trying to figure out if I've the right family on the census.

I have a marriage cert- 1845 - but there's three children (one - my ancestor- has the right name I don't know about siblings so trying to figure out if this is them). The location is right and the surname is an unusual one. The first names of the parents match the wedding cert.

I had the idea in my head that couples, where the man stuck around, would get married way back them. Reputation and all that kind of public opinion.

OP posts:
Windgate · 18/11/2018 08:16

Seamstress was a euphemism for prostitute
Does anybody links or articles to explain this? I have a couple of seamstress single mothers in my tree, I'm now wondering if the were, in fact, prostitutes

stellarparallax · 18/11/2018 10:26

Well, actual seamstresses did exist! They can’t all have been tarts as well.

notpushyinterested · 18/11/2018 10:35

If you Google there is reference to this happening in the USA.

But seamstress was a legitimate job !

StripySocksAndDocs · 21/11/2018 21:05

Not got any further with this. Still no trace of first wife, but he’s certainly down as widower when he marries the woman who is on all censuses as living with him. Hadn’t thought of his two wives having the same name though, they’d have been the same age too though.

OP posts:
OlennasWimple · 21/11/2018 21:14

The Seamstresses' Guild in Ankh-Morpork was one of the most powerful in the city Wink

Theworldisfullofgs · 01/02/2019 19:29

I have an ancestor that never married. But that was because she was married before and did not get divorced. It just didn't happen then - act of parliament etc

She is down in the census as the same name as 'husband' but never married him.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page