I’m interested in others thoughts on Alan Titchmarsh’s comments about the RHS ‘pandering to rewilders’ at Chelsea. 50 or 60 years ago when Alan Titchmarsh was learning his gardening, the gardening establishment was a very different place. The gardener was told how important double digging was, fruit trees had several sprays each year to “keep off” pests, soil was an inert substance to be sterilised if you were using it in a pot, mycorrhizal fungi were strange exotic things associated only with orchids.
RHS has had to do the hell of a swing to overturn all that. Maybe it’s gone too far? Maybe it has deliberately overstated in order to drive the message home? There are still many people who haven’t got the message. Look at artificial lawns, Green thumb with its chemical heavy approach, the people who complain to the Council about “relaxed mowing”, the people, including eminent gardeners, wanting to continue the use of peat.
Weeds are difficult. You cite dandelions and green alkanet. But I am-in a different part of the country from you and have never seen a monoculture of green alkanet. And in any case, it’s not a native, it was introduced into gardens so is a bit of an own goal. Dandelions get everywhere but don’t usually form a monoculture. For me, worse by far than both of those is Alchemilla mollis, and people still pay good money for that. Further, in an NNR I know well, there are very few dandelions - you can walk all day and see perhaps one or two, but Alchemilla mollis is getting a hold.
If I want to see Derbyshire moorland I can go to the Peak District. But the people the RHS are talking to probably won’t, and even if they do, we’ve wrecked much of our moorland landscapes.
At Chelsea, I want to see cutting edge garden design, and inspirational planting. New ideas. New plants. But gardening with wild plants, gardening in a way that sustains wildlife, is at the moment cutting edge.