@DaisyNGO
I'm interested to know how much people thought was his imagination. The whole thing?
I also heard that many people thought he killed his neighbour and the director released a scene that proved he didn't because so many people thought it.
I was mystified why anyone thought he did.
Also, I haven't read anything Batman related, so wondered if this depiction of Gotham City was literally intended as New York in the 80s or the period where it was really rough.
There was a scene shot where his neighbour was watching him on TV, which showed he hadn’t killed her, but the director said it spoiled the flow of the TV narrative so was edited out.
I never thought he did. The essential ‘Him’ was not a nasty incel type. He reacted to bullying and being framed by someone he thought was a friend.
Any interaction with his neighbour beyond the wry exchange in the faulty lift and her being horrified he was in her flat was his imagination, though.
Gotham City is suitable to many interpretations, depending on the writer/director/illustrator’s point of view. The 80s setting in this film was appropriate because you could make a strong case for that era being the age when false celebrity really took off, humiliation of ordinary people was becoming entertainment, rich entrepreneurs like Thomas Wayne could put on the veneer of munificence while being just as rapacious and corrupt as those that had come before them.
Also, no place for people with mental health issues, that previously would have seen them at least looked after to some extent in the old asylums.
I think Thomas Wayne was his father and that he’d had his mother shut away and branded insane to keep her quiet.