Rambling thoughts on numbers in the battle for the soul of the blue rosette ....I just looked up ( only on wiki) numbers of Tory MPs. At the end of the election it was 330 now it's 289.
So 41 have gone at various stages after the TIggers and now the latest expulsions and resignations.
Throughout Cameron and May's time there's been this desperation not to split and keep the ERG in the fold. On the numbers the result is not far off what it would have been if Cameron or May had stood up to the ERG iyswim.
There were ever only 50? ERG members. So they've been appeased and retained at the price of losing 41?
All of this never ending dystopian clusterfuck emanates from Cameron calling a referendum to appease the ERG. There was an unhealable schism and it's still there.
But why have the 50 been winning over time? Why have they gained the 'prize' of the Conservative banner Why weren't the 41+ supported more by the non ERG conservatives. Does it all really come down to fear of Farage who time and time again is unproven electorally- his great March flopped spectacularly etc. It's fear that has seemed to shift the rest of Tory party to a Faragist position.
Not sure where I'm going with this but the 50 have been disproportionately powerful. Appeasing them over the years has facilitated the coup advancement. Why? The ERG should be the ones filtering off to be independents now. The 240 MPs in the middle I guess should have acted more cohesively. There should have been another taxpayer funded internal faction. It could have been organised into the ONC ( one nation Conservative) faction with I don't know Ruth D, Ken C, Amber Rudd Chuka Umunna , Nick Boles et al.
I think it's also down to organisation and petty differences whereas the ERG have a long term cohesive group so have been able to act boldly as they feel they belong to a supportive tribe.
I never thought I'd spend this long thinking about the Conservative party.