If I meet someone (IRL or online) that disagrees with my opinions on Brexit, I do try to discuss it, time permitting, They have brought it up after all.
I'm not very good at debate though! I believe it is important not to be afraid of saying something. Otherwise the propaganda battle is just won by the soundbites lifted straight from faragist sources, or from Cummings team or the Daily Vile etc.
There is an awful lot of money being put into propaganda in one direction and no concerted cohesive effort to counteract it.
The thing I find hardest is that my instinct is to back up what I am saying with facts. That doesn't work as it is about the feelings..So it's better to validate the others feelings " It's completely understandable and brave to take that stance..." etc .
However I then find it hard to progress with explaining the benefits (of unrestricted access to a market on our doorstep worth $18.8 trillion of 500 million consumers! Plus peace and the GFA) .
Because of all the nonsense that has gone for decades before it is very difficult to show the comparability with the emotional Britannia rules the waves type rationale.
I agree that if you can encourage just one person to look beyond the tabloids and do some proper fact finding ready for a GE or any future referendums then It is worth it.
I have had a few, only half a dozen people say they supported me in a FB debate with a leaver. One said she found a couple of my links useful. The links she particularly liked were to trade publications so things like farmer's weekly, transport monthly, pharmatimes etc etc She said she hadn't thought of reading sector specific publications which do counteract certain political rhetoric.