Thank you BurnTheBlackSuit, I'm here all week!
"I'm curious as to how soon leave voters expect to see positive results, because the leave campaign has promised to do an awful lot with that £350 million. What will happen if, in a year or two's time, the NHS is still struggling due to underfunding, and immigration hasn't fallen?"
Fair questions, to answer which I have to refer to one Nigel Farage ( boo hiss!).
The Leave campaign is not presenting a manifesto. Come the 24th the despicable subreptile tories will still be in power. Sorry chaps but this isn't a general election and you all screwed the pooch last year so will have to live with the consequences of a tory government.
That being said maybe we can hope that the leavers are slightly less reptilian, shifty and may take account of the public mood. I'm assuming that asshat Cameron is toast here.
There will be considerable pressure on the government to reduce immigration, and shorn of their EU related excuses I honestly think they would have to act.
Can you imagine Boris waffling about how his referendum speeches were merely an ambition?...
.....
Yes, well, so can I actually...
Hmm.. Is there much point here trying to pretend that all politicians aren't lying toads? I think it's likely they would act, not certain though....
The NHS would certainly get more money, but really not much changes. The first trade deal signed would be big news, fisheries having a boom similar to a gold rush etc but fundamentally you still have a tory government with a slim majority.
Hell even if the treasury is spot on...
" But of course there was a significant shortfall in real GDP growth over the previous three years leaving the level of GDP around 2¼ per cent lower in 2014-15 than we had forecast in 2010."
That's from the Office for Budget Responsibility, who were set up because the treasury were so... shit at predicting anything. They'd predict whatever their current masters told them to.
That quote though represents a loss of predicted growth which dwarfs the treasuries brexit prediction over a 4 year period, not 15 years.
2 1/4% lower is a whole lot more than 6% less growth.. See the language? One measures absolute growth, the other relative.
I'm trying to point out that not a lot changes, though not sure how successful I'm being at it!