Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

EHCP and permanent exclusion

39 replies

SMO212 · 05/12/2025 23:03

My son is in year 7, EHCP and been permanently excluded.
He was in mainstream and I was trying to get a change of placement but the LA had not put the paperwork through in time and told me to wait. In which time he was PEX. I'm not appealing the PEX as it's pretty pointless, he lasted 10 weeks in Mainstream school.
Now the PEX has prompted a change of placement under section I. I have named a specialist, the LA are consulting on Parental preference. But they feel his needs can still be met in Mainstream and consulting with them.
Due to the PEX he is now educated outside of school and the LA have set him work online with a tutor online. Which obviously does not meet provision F. I also work full time and after next week I have zero childcare. I have complained to the director of children and suprise, nobody cares.
I have two questions with anyone that has been through this:
1.When the LA name a school that is not parental preference I have the right to appeal under SEN tribunal, this is currently a 9-12 month wait, is this triaged as more urgent as he is not in school? Also will the 'tutoring' remain in place whilst I appeal?
2.I have contacted every solicitor I possibly can to proceed with judicial review, can anyone recommend anyone that could take legal aid and has availability?
I actually have no idea what to do and I don't actually no how I'm going to keep my job. Anyone that's been through this experience and could share would be much appreciated, I can't find this situation online anywhere.O

OP posts:
Buscake · 02/02/2026 18:33

Thegladstonebag · 02/02/2026 17:19

It’s still the LA’s short term setting for students following a PEX, before they move to a more suitable placement. I ran one and we had several children with EHCPs.

Must just be your LA. I’ve worked in 6 LAs and none will take CYP with EHCPs

ExistingonCoffee · 02/02/2026 21:09

Not all sixth day provision is made via PRUs but some is, including sometimes for DC with EHCPs.

Whether PRUs can be named in EHCPs depends on how it is registered. Despite what they are known as, some PRUs are registered schools so can be named in I.

spanieleyes · 03/02/2026 07:11

Buscake · 02/02/2026 18:33

Must just be your LA. I’ve worked in 6 LAs and none will take CYP with EHCPs

Our local PRU takes children with an EHCP for either a 16 week “reset” placement or a placement after exclusion as long as the intention is that they remain in mainstream provision afterwards, they won’t generally take them whilst looking for specialist provision ( although an occasional exception has been made)

Thegladstonebag · 03/02/2026 12:44

That’s very sad. In my experience most cases parents have accepted the PRU’s offer and it’s been helpful to keep the student in a ‘school’ setting. Granted those who accept have normally been excluded for behavioural reasons. It never crossed my mind to say no when I got the 6 day call from the LA. Good to know my LA are proactive in this respect anyway.

drspouse · 03/02/2026 12:55

Buscake · 01/02/2026 19:23

It’s not usual if you have an EHCP. PRUs cannot be named in section I

My DS had the primary PRU named on his EHCP, he was there for 3 years.
LEA have to provide full time education from the second week after exclusion.

LoveSandbanks · 03/02/2026 13:08

cotswoldsgal1234 · 06/12/2025 04:38

To be permanently excluded, with an EHCP, he must have done something very serious?
Do you really want him in a mainstream school? The rise in EHCPs is putting a massive strain on everyone in education, so not surprised you are waiting for so long. It seems everyone is waiting for a ND assessment.

I’m struggling to see how your comment could be interpreted as helpful?

Nowhere has the poster said her son is ND or waiting for an ND assessment. He already has an EHCP and most of us with kids with SEND really couldn’t give a shit about the cost of them on the education system. We’re far too caught up in trying to keep our jobs so that we can keep a roof over the heads of our children while the education authority fail to meet their needs.

Its surprisingly common for at least one parent to lose their job and I’ve know a number of parents that have had their homes be repossessed and forced into bankruptcy due to the lost income from being forced to take time off work to care for children who should be in school.

And as for him having to “have done something pretty bad” you have no idea of how low the tolerance level of a school
that doesn’t want to meet the needs of a pupil.

In year7, in a failing setting, my son was picking up chairs to throw at other pupils. An act that would get most suspended at best. The response was merely “we don’t have chairs over our head #sonsname” …

LoveSandbanks · 03/02/2026 13:12

JennyForeigner · 06/12/2025 06:58

I work in schools and LAs are now telling us it is their policy that disabled young people must 'fail' and be pexed before they will consider special education. It's horribly unfair and abusive of children who are being put through a disruptive and in many cases terrifying experience in settings, but nonetheless the being put through behaviour sanctions and a completely alien and bewildering process for their distress. In the meantime, LAs will throw everything at fighting a PEX having directed a kid into a completely unsuitable setting and will push parents to go to IRP/tribunal. It's a cheap and cynical way of distracting parents for years at a time by making the school out to be the bad guy.

And then you have posters like the one above saying the kid 'must have done something really bad'.

At this point quite probably they were a profoundly autistic kid dumped in a huge secondary with no quiet spaces and who became overwhelmed. But if they are a risk to the safety of others around them and the school has no way to support them to be safe, schools have to consider permanent exclusion.

I agree with the poster above - contact local schools and cooperate with them on a true understanding of your child's needs so they can respond meaningfully to consultation. If you think mainstream will be a cycle of failure and disruption, hold firm. And if you have the resources to consider judicial review, fabulous. We need all of the case law we can get.

And as result of being forced into an unsuitable setting and then being blamed for its failure these children then develop ptsd and are too traumatised to succeed in education anywhere.

But, we must think about the taxpayer when considering the needs of SEND pupils.

Fuck!!!

SMO212 · 03/02/2026 16:10

Update- So no school, out local PRU is KS4 only so that's a no. Specialist do not have any space or can't meet need.

I've given up my job and he has tutors funded for 6 hours a week by the LA...so I'm essentially forced homeschooling, they won't even fund a day a week at a forest school.

I have to await to appeal which is 12-18 months.

I have had a solicitor, the lot, there is literally no answer at all. There's so many children in this situation that even court doesn't faze my LA, I think they must be taken a lot.

For the unkind comments you are obviously rather uneducated, cold and heartless. I've worked in schools for years, the threshold for young people with SEN to be PEx is very low, SEN kids do not produce the data wanted, so the first chance of getting rid of them is jumped on.

OP posts:
drspouse · 03/02/2026 16:25

When my son was in the PRU they had 5 year olds coming in an hour each way. They should find him a place elsewhere.

FakeItUntilIMakeIt · 03/02/2026 18:19

Can you ask SENDIST to expidite your appeal since your son has no school place.

Has the LA really consulted with every specialist school? In my LA they will insist on consulting with maintained and academy specialist schools and claim they won’t consult with independent specialist schools (they don’t even mention they exist on their website).

Good luck with your appeal OP. The SEND system completely broken.

ExistingonCoffee · 03/02/2026 20:24

If your solicitor has said there is nothing you can do whilst appealing, they are, frankly, rubbish. The LA has a duty to ensure DS receives a suitable full-time education and anything detailed, specified and quantified in F of the EHCP. 6hrs hours tuition per week is not that. And you can’t be compelled to give up work and facilitate it. If the LA is refusing, you need a pre-action letter. If that doesn’t work, you can move to JR proceedings themselves.

As pp said, you can request an expedited appeal hearing too.

In case you are unaware, unless the school is wholly independent, on its own, being full is not a lawful reason to refuse to name a school.

somanychristmaslights · 03/02/2026 20:43

Sorry to hear what you’re going through. Have you spoken to charities to help? There’s a charity in my area called The Autism Apprentice who will consult with you. They’re very experienced in these sort of things.

singlepringle12 · 03/02/2026 20:48

I’m sorry to read your update. The systems are so completely broken. I’m also surprised by some of the comments around PEXing SEN. The thresholds are the same when it comes to safety and violent/threatening incidents?
My only advice would be to keep hassling, keep asking, keep making a nuisance of yourself in every way possible. Are there any other options school-wise in your area? Some mainstream schools have separate ‘centres’ for students (I work in one of these) and so although they have the mainstream label, actually their facilities are treated separately & can be much less ‘intense’ as a result. I’m guessing you’ve looked at every option though :(

HarryVanderspeigle · 03/02/2026 20:56

Is there a school you believe can meet needs and have you stated it as parental preference? If they can't find a school for him, they should be funding eotis.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page