Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

Shocked only 35% of kids in town get grade 5 English & maths GCSEs [Title edited by MNHQ at OP's request]

78 replies

Monvelo · 26/10/2025 09:39

What the title says!

We are making secondary choices at the moment and there is no local school option that gets even as much as 40% of kids gaining grade 5 or above in English and maths. My understanding is that's a grade C. Why are the results so low?! Would welcome thoughts.

This is a market town. The 2 schools in question are rated Ofsted good. The progress 8 scores are not currently provided. Some kids do go off to grammar, but my old school is closer to grammars and has a much higher pass rate.

OP posts:
MagicLoop · 27/10/2025 07:59

My experience was that yes, now there are a whole layer of "managers" in teaching, who actually actively hinder the work of the classroom teacher. Added to that all admin support has been removed, so a lot of time is spent on that.

Yes. Sometimes it feels like trying to do an office job, but being unable to get your work done because you have to spend 4 or 5 hours a day in a room with 30 kids! I hate the fact that lessons sometimes feel like they are getting in the way of me getting my work done, when really it's the other way around. It was not like this early in my career (I've been a teacher for 30 years). The amount of admin is ridiculous.

MrPickles73 · 27/10/2025 08:07

Our local comp it's 35.3% which is below local average and national average 42%.
That's why we send one kid to independent school and another to state boarding grammar. One of our friends at the local comp has had no science teacher for 3 years just worksheets. No one likes the headmaster (previous head was fab). And sport is dire..

MrPickles73 · 27/10/2025 08:11

There is a state comp 30mins away in the next county that scores 44% with similar demographics so it can be done.. just not at our local school..

potato08 · 27/10/2025 08:12

There are no P8 scores for last year or this year.
They didn't sit Y6 sats.

potato08 · 27/10/2025 08:32

IbizaToTheNorfolkBroads · 26/10/2025 10:44

DS took his GCSEs last summer. His was the Year 6 who had their SATs cancelled, who didn’t finish primary school, started secondary school with social distancing and were locked down again a term later. Then in year 8 a lot of schools clissd again because of RAAC. Bearing this is mind, you can see that some kids may not have fulfilled their potential, particularly where they may also have had a difficult home life, no support out of school or parents that were ill (or even died) or unable to help them for other reasons.

Hopefully the poor results you’re seeing for recent years will be an anomaly. One of the episodes of the recent series of Educating Yorkshire (Episode 3 or 4) focusses on Y11 mocks. In that episode, the Headteacher Mr Burton has a lot to say about how badly the GCSE class of 2025 were affected by the lockdowns.

My dd, too.
Her confidence in her abilities was totally shot.
We got her a tutor for English language and - against the wishes of the school - she sat the Foundation maths paper (she needed a 4 for her post 16 course)
She got a 6 and a 5 respectively.
It's hard enough going onto post 16 courses - which are a big jump up from gcses - without sitting resits at the same time.
I'm aware that dd is lucky we could afford the tutor and that, as a parent, I fought the school wrt which maths paper she sat. At one point, I told them I'd pay for her to sit the lower paper!
It's so tough for these kids, and all some schools seem to care about is their progress data with the ever present spectre of ofsted in the wings

Monvelo · 27/10/2025 08:35

verycloakanddaggers · 27/10/2025 07:29

It reads like you (incorrectly) believe that schools are the sole influencing factor on what grades are achieved.

What's the historic Progress 8 for the school?

Is this to me? That's not what I think. I'm just looking at which school to apply for and was surprised that there's not really a difference between the two, based on grades, and both sounded poor to me. I couldn't think of a reason for this as one is in a decent market town and one is in a Cotswold town. I would expect the influence of grammar to be bigger in other towns closer to them. That was my starting position. Kind of, I can't work out why the two schools here are both poor performing and both as bad as each other! Based on grades.

OP posts:
Moglet4 · 27/10/2025 08:37

RedToothBrush · 26/10/2025 14:17

I was looking at these scores for a couple of local authorities close to me.

I came across Broadoak in Trafford. Trafford has a grammar school system that takes off all the best students before you start and there's been some issues in recent years from parents who haven't passed the 11+, who have then applied for other schools in Trafford but failed to get a place because, everywhere is so over subscribed, being allocated Broadoak. It's managed to get itself the reputation as the school you REALLY didn't want to allocated in this situation.

It gets 28.3% Grade 5 or above in English and Maths. (Broken down by sex boys do better with 30.4% compared to the girls 26.3%)

This really doesn't tell the whole story though. It has a rate of 27.2% persistent absence, 22.71% needing SEN support, 19.8% whose first language isn't English and 52.38% eligible for school dinners.

And looking further, when you look at just those classified as deprived, only 8.2% get grade 5 or above. Strikingly though when you look at just those with English as an additional language 64.5% get grade 5 or above.

In other words the defining factor was effectively economic status at Broadoak.

You then compare with the top grammar schools in Trafford, Alty Girls and Alty Boys. The girls has 99.5% Grade 5 and above and the boys 98%. Persistent absence - 10.9% and 14.3%, SEN support 5.2% and 7.6%, English as an additional language 25.4% and 48.8% and free school meal provision 6.28% and 5.72% respectively for each for girls and boys schools.

100% of the deprived kids at both the girls and boys grammars get grade 5 and above.

The contrast in the outcomes for those on free school meals in Trafford is absolutely shocking - more so than simply the headline figure that Broadoak seems to show with only 28.3% getting the Grade 5 or above. It's pretty much if you are on free school meals in Trafford if you fail the 11+ what actually is the point in even turning up for school at Broadoak??? It's difficult to argue to the contrary looking at the figures. It is truly appalling.

This pattern is repeated in areas where there aren't grammars schools, albeit it to a slightly less significant degree (though not much better)

GCSEs really are doing nothing for these kids apart from frame them as failures and the insistent on everyone doing them doesn't help these kids and society as a whole. They genuinely would be better not sitting the exams and instead being given practical training from a young age. When people talk about wanting to cut benefits etc if you aren't looking at the figures here, then you aren't doing your fucking job. Arguably we should be looking at a wholesale rethink of the entire educational system. No wonder we have huge rates of depression and stress in young people.

My point being, that not only should you be looking at the headline numbers but you should also really look at some of the other details in the government data.

You’re basically right when you say it’s economic status as in Broadoak the parents are 3rd generation unemployed and many of the kids come in with no aspirations and appalling behaviour. However, it’s a school that has outstanding SEN provision and excellent provision for the top sets do actually, if you are capable of 7-9 you will get it. It’s not quite as straightforward as it seems, though. Whilst technically it is in Trafford, it’s actually a good distance away from the grammars and has no public transport. It’s effectively in a self-contained very small town. That means the more affluent families know nothing about it other than the reputation it had 20 years ago and the reputation the town has now (as being very rough). They don’t want to take the risk with their kids because they can’t get there independently so they send them to other state schools, some of which are far worse than Broadoak. My point, I suppose, is that you can’t judge all the problems on paper- you need to know the area and the school.

lljkk · 27/10/2025 08:43

OP, are you in Kent or Bucks? Because you talk about grammar schools. The grammar schools are unusual option afaik.

my understanding is that the divide between avg achievement at comps & grammar schools in Kent is stark but also widely known, I wouldn't expect OP to be surprised if she's lived in a Kent market town for a long time.

I lived almost 20 yrs in a market town with underachieving comp (not Kent or Bucks, no grammars here). Every year the comp had some very high achievers. The statistics are averages not about what will happen to an individual child's results.

TheNightingalesStarling · 27/10/2025 08:47

Slightly O/T but I 5hink the next couple of years with no P8 scores will either completely undermine SATs as Secondary schools can be judged without the data... or reinforce the need for them. They are far fro. Perfect (or more accurately the way Primary Schools obsess with them to the detriment of pupils) but overall we do all want to know the teaching at Secondary is effective

EmeraldJeanie · 27/10/2025 08:57

My children went to a comprehensive in a non grammar school area. Considered Cinderella school in area. Has very high PP and avoided by many. Headline maths / English bit higher than ops but similar and doesn't tell the full story. Pupils do tend to get what they need for next steps. School does functional skills maths/ English alongside gcse for some children. My children got high level gcses and effort put into all children whatever their starting points. PP money benefited all children at the school concerning enrichment. PP so high absolutely no stigma.
Those who avoided the school look surprised at how happy my children were there and how well they did. They both look back fondly (one at sixth-form and other at University).
Look beyond Headline figures...

leakycauldron · 27/10/2025 09:09

I feel at a loss with all this.

DD is year 5 and we have done the rounds of local secondary schools. We have 4 grammar schools and one religious secondary school near by. So they take the top students.
DD is not grammar school material and we wouldn't ever force that on her as we know it would not be the place for her.
However the surrounding secondary schools are not great result wise ... progress 8s are all below average. I feel like I need a degree to be able to interpret the results! And I work in a secondary school!!! (Non teaching)

DD will need support in secondary as she needs it now in primary and is still behind. And totally agree with previous poster who said about teachers moving on without students fully grasping something!!!

We do try and do stuff with DD but it's a massive battle (she has suspected adhd) we have just about got her to do spellings of an evening. DH wants her to have a tutor but there is no way we will get her to one and one coming to us will just be a waste of money. She will fight it.

It's all so frustrating. Schools just don't seem to work for a lot of kids these days yet nothing ever changes!

OhDear111 · 27/10/2025 09:29

@Monvelo Because they don’t have enough dc who are high achieving. You need to look at prior achievement. How many are low, middle and high achievers? I’m in a grammar County and dc in the secondaries still are around 30% high achieving in the secondary schools! Of course these dc do well and aren’t much different to 1/4 of the grammar dc. However a few secondary schools here aren’t great but they still get dc because dc can walk to them! They do serve their community, but not as well as they should. Other areas have grammars too.

So when looking at schools, headline figures tell you little. The catchment families, staff retention, quality of teaching, interest in learning by pupils, suitable curriculum, ambition, and prior attainment all make a huge difference.

For anyone whose dc are struggling academically, look at the progress and attainment of lower achievers and SEN numbers. This tells you how well, or otherwise, dc might do. Ofsted usually comment on Sen provision too.

Monvelo · 27/10/2025 09:44

@leakycauldron you are in a really similar situation to us! I worry for dyslexic dd, she loves school and loves learning but is behind, particularly on maths. She could be lost in a big school, fall in with low achieving or be impacted by disruptive behaviour. Getting her to do 'extra' to support at home is a massive battle and she's not willing to go to a tutor regularly.

OP posts:
Monvelo · 27/10/2025 09:47

@lljkk no a different county

OP posts:
Monvelo · 27/10/2025 09:55

There are apparently 1000 grammar school places in the county but say 50% are filled by out of country children. Was trying to work out what percentage from here go to grammar but can't.

OP posts:
AtomHeartMotherOfGod · 27/10/2025 10:02

Fralle · 26/10/2025 10:40

I'm sorry but reading this leaves me feeling utterly aghast.

Just last week there was a thread ripping apart home education with many posters stating the only way to get a full and comprehensive education is state school. And we're seeing evidence that despite full time school from the age of 4/5, a lot of children are not reading let alone achieving maths and English GCSEs?

It's not rocket science to come to the conclusion that state education is not even up to the basic standard all children deserve. School takes up a significant part of their childhood, what a waste of time for some children. Of course no overhaul of the system will ever happen and children will continue to fail.

Schools have lists of 'daily readers', who are often managed by diverting LSAs from their 1:1s as practically, finding time to listen to children read is tricky (my Y3 class had about 10-12).

As a 6th former I volunteered as part of General Studies to help at my old school, and always read regularly with a boy in Year 6; beginning of the term he'd get stuck on words like 'the' and read two or three, 6 to 8-word pages in a session. By end of half term he'd read half the book, mostly fluently. Holidays happened, he was back to (almost) square one.

Teachers can not do everything! We teach and re-teach phonics but unless they are embedded by regularly reading, the knowledge will fade. Parent involvement is critical and that is why children from families that value education will always do better.

TheTallgiraffe · 27/10/2025 10:03

Fralle · 26/10/2025 10:40

I'm sorry but reading this leaves me feeling utterly aghast.

Just last week there was a thread ripping apart home education with many posters stating the only way to get a full and comprehensive education is state school. And we're seeing evidence that despite full time school from the age of 4/5, a lot of children are not reading let alone achieving maths and English GCSEs?

It's not rocket science to come to the conclusion that state education is not even up to the basic standard all children deserve. School takes up a significant part of their childhood, what a waste of time for some children. Of course no overhaul of the system will ever happen and children will continue to fail.

I was thinking the same thing.....

Would it be ok for people on this thread to suggest that you home educate your child instead as we're concerned about an impending "avalanche of illiterate school children" ?
( not sure if avalanche was the word used on the other thread, but it was something like that).

noblegiraffe · 27/10/2025 10:06

OhDear111 · 27/10/2025 09:29

@Monvelo Because they don’t have enough dc who are high achieving. You need to look at prior achievement. How many are low, middle and high achievers? I’m in a grammar County and dc in the secondaries still are around 30% high achieving in the secondary schools! Of course these dc do well and aren’t much different to 1/4 of the grammar dc. However a few secondary schools here aren’t great but they still get dc because dc can walk to them! They do serve their community, but not as well as they should. Other areas have grammars too.

So when looking at schools, headline figures tell you little. The catchment families, staff retention, quality of teaching, interest in learning by pupils, suitable curriculum, ambition, and prior attainment all make a huge difference.

For anyone whose dc are struggling academically, look at the progress and attainment of lower achievers and SEN numbers. This tells you how well, or otherwise, dc might do. Ofsted usually comment on Sen provision too.

You can’t look at the progress by prior attainment on the current set of results as they didn’t sit SATs so no prior attainment was recorded.

qwertyasdfgzxcv · 27/10/2025 10:15

@Devonshiregal I agree with the poster who said not reading is an issue. Children need to read regularly throughout primary as it really is the key to success. What's more, it's free (if you have a local library). Parents and children just don't anymore. Often parents don't model reading at home either. Reading is so much more than decoding.

FuzzyWolf · 27/10/2025 10:20

That’s very poor for the school. I know the local state secondary here is considered academically well above average but I’ve just googled it to compare and 76% of students received a grade 5 or above in both English and Maths.

KitsyWitsy · 27/10/2025 10:40

There's just no value placed on education by many kids and their parents. There's always an excuse for why the child is performing poorly. No personal responsibility either by child or parents.

I was taught to read before I went to school by my mum. That gave me such a head start I think. She also used to buy me those workbooks from Smiths and make me do them. I hated it at the time but now I look back and I am so bloody grateful for her efforts. I got into a good school (grammar type school but not) and thrived. I grew up on a rough council estate in Bradford so all my peers at the time just didn't achieve anything. My mum worked all hours as a nurse as well so she wasn't a sahm with time on her hands, she made time. My education was important to her.

When I see schools on television, it doesn't surprise me that nobody learns anything.

OhDear111 · 27/10/2025 15:42

@noblegiraffe There’s previous info. It’s getting a feel for the pupil make up. Info for 22/23 and 23/24 is there. It’s not going to markedly change.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 27/10/2025 15:53

OhDear111 · 27/10/2025 15:42

@noblegiraffe There’s previous info. It’s getting a feel for the pupil make up. Info for 22/23 and 23/24 is there. It’s not going to markedly change.

Edited

Why not? You're looking at before Covid and before Brexit, before the explosion in the cost of living and before the harshest changes to the benefits system. The Admissions Code has changed since then, entire demographics in many schools have changed dramatically with population movements, every school will have at least consulted on their Admissions policies and changed them in that time, the staff, facilities, structure, income, everything has changed - a 16-18 year old leaving school before all of that is a completely different child living in a completely different place to one now.

MagicLoop · 27/10/2025 17:15

lljkk · 27/10/2025 08:43

OP, are you in Kent or Bucks? Because you talk about grammar schools. The grammar schools are unusual option afaik.

my understanding is that the divide between avg achievement at comps & grammar schools in Kent is stark but also widely known, I wouldn't expect OP to be surprised if she's lived in a Kent market town for a long time.

I lived almost 20 yrs in a market town with underachieving comp (not Kent or Bucks, no grammars here). Every year the comp had some very high achievers. The statistics are averages not about what will happen to an individual child's results.

Kent and Bucks are not the only counties with grammar schools. There are some grammar schools in Lancashire, Yorkshire, Essex, Devon and a few others I think.

OhDear111 · 27/10/2025 19:27

@MagicLoop Derailing a bit but Bucks operates the 11 plus test for all dc unless dc are withdrawn. The grammars are 13 in number and are county wide. Devon has a handful of grammars and there’s no county test for all dc. Some grammars usually means super selective grammars like Colyton in Devon. So not the same.

Swipe left for the next trending thread