Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

August born child & reception. Defer or start?

60 replies

Lilly51 · 14/08/2025 10:26

Advice from fellow mums please :)

I have an August born child due to start Reception in September 2025. She has a slight language delay. She is verbal but her functional communication is not quite there yet and sometimes she struggles to follow instructions. She is fully potty trained but still needs help with wiping and is not fully confident using the toilet on her own.

Academically she is slightly ahead. She can already read full sentences, knows all her phonics and recognises high numbers.

I am debating whether to send her to Reception in September or defer until January 2026. Are Reception teachers generally good at supporting children with these kinds of needs?

Another option is to keep her in her current private nursery for another year. It is linked to a private school and is almost at Reception level already. They use workbooks, have a classroom set up, do registration and the children bring school bags. They are also great at preparing children for school.

OP posts:
Lilly51 · 14/08/2025 11:48

That’s the gist I’m getting from most people, I think I’ll have a leap of faith and see how she gets on.

OP posts:
Drfosters · 14/08/2025 12:17

Honestly, send her and see what happens. No one really has any clue whatsoever how their child will take to school and how they will develop. If it turns out they don’t settle in after a few weeks take a view. They may, however, thrive with new friends and the mental stimulus. Don’t try and second guess but deal with issues as they arrive. Don’t preempt problems.

Lilly51 · 14/08/2025 12:45

you are absolutely right, I love this outlook.

OP posts:
Parksinyork · 14/08/2025 12:49

Pices · 14/08/2025 11:04

Defer. Every single time. It’s not worth the pain later.

I agree. Reception is very supportive but it’s the jump to year 1 which is massive.

tumblebumbleweed · 14/08/2025 13:58

I have a VERY late August born son who I’m deferring, having spoken to several teachers and spent a while reading into many studies there was no way I was sending my son this year. There appear to be no additional needs but I simply feel he will be better prepared next year and would rather him have another year of play!

im not so concerned about reception but rather the fact at just turned 5 he would be entering year 1. With all the expectations that would then be placed on him I just feel it’s too much at that age.

i appreciate everyone’s different but I want him to thrive not simply survive.

tinyspiny · 14/08/2025 14:38

Pices · 14/08/2025 11:04

Defer. Every single time. It’s not worth the pain later.

Rubbish , I was a summer holiday baby and was always fine at school , went to Grammar etc as did numerous children of friends who were late July / August birthdays and that includes children still at school now . It is down to the individual child .

Ineedanewsofa · 14/08/2025 14:54

Mine turns 10 in a couple of days 😊 We didn’t defer and it’s been the right choice. Academically it all evened out around yr3, from a stamina perspective around the end of yr 1. COVID stole most of their reception year and a chunk of yr1 however so they did have more time to mature

Gloschick · 14/08/2025 14:54

I would send her this year. Reception is pretty low pressure as it is play based, and she can already do the academics required for that year so she can spend the year developing her social and language skills.
You say her current class is a bit like reception. If that is true, surely she will go slightly mad repeating the nursery year she has just done and then doing a 3rd reception-like year at school.
The reality is, that if a child has an issue, it either resolves with time or persists. Eg. My ds is dyslexic (and now a straight A student). I recall my dd starting school 2 years after him and within a few months she had overtaken her brother in reading and writing. Does that mean I should have held him back a year? (He was spring born so not an option). No, because even in the year below, everyone would still have been ahead of him. He was very bright though and would have become very frustrated if held back a year. If your dd seems bright, then plough on. The language thing will sort itself out with time.

opencecilgee · 14/08/2025 15:00

She can read sentences?

send her then

She will be ahead of the others (including the 5 and year olds already held back)

Drfosters · 14/08/2025 15:03

tumblebumbleweed · 14/08/2025 13:58

I have a VERY late August born son who I’m deferring, having spoken to several teachers and spent a while reading into many studies there was no way I was sending my son this year. There appear to be no additional needs but I simply feel he will be better prepared next year and would rather him have another year of play!

im not so concerned about reception but rather the fact at just turned 5 he would be entering year 1. With all the expectations that would then be placed on him I just feel it’s too much at that age.

i appreciate everyone’s different but I want him to thrive not simply survive.

Children are all different but in my DS’s class the most academic and social children were the July and August birthdays. In reception it seems very scary when you see your tiny child walk in but a good school will ensure they all thrive whenever they were born.

Criteria16 · 14/08/2025 15:27

I would send her from September. My experience of Reception is that there is not much stress really. Many if not all the children will not be great at wiping and some will also still have regular accidents. So many will not be great at following instructions either!

Our school asked to send in a change of clothes in their bag at the start of Reception. Also, they had toilets IN the class, just to be used by the R children and looking exactly like the ones in the nurseries.

My DS had a fantastic time as the learning is still based on playing, which is what they do most of the time anyway. The teacher and TA were so experienced and fantastic at dealing with every child and their needs.
I would not defer to January to be honest, as she will join a class where the children have already adapted to the dynamics of school and it might be harder for her. Also, at least in our school, there were so many exciting new things happening in the first few months that keep DS excited: the first few whole-class birthday parties (where also parents start to socialize and know each other), Halloween parties, the million Christmas celebrations...

tumblebumbleweed · 14/08/2025 19:08

Drfosters · 14/08/2025 15:03

Children are all different but in my DS’s class the most academic and social children were the July and August birthdays. In reception it seems very scary when you see your tiny child walk in but a good school will ensure they all thrive whenever they were born.

Having looked at all the data I can see that there’s a clear disadvantage to being born in the younger months, I thought it wouldn’t have much impact but right through school it does in terms of mental health stats( more August born needing support) and academic struggles are a lot higher.

I really didn’t want to be ‘that’ parent but was quite surprised at the data.

Drfosters · 14/08/2025 19:43

tumblebumbleweed · 14/08/2025 19:08

Having looked at all the data I can see that there’s a clear disadvantage to being born in the younger months, I thought it wouldn’t have much impact but right through school it does in terms of mental health stats( more August born needing support) and academic struggles are a lot higher.

I really didn’t want to be ‘that’ parent but was quite surprised at the data.

yes that can be the case but doesn’t mean someone’s individual child will be affected. The best thing to check is what is a spread of ages in the class. If you get a class of 30 with 25 born in sept-dec then that is a big issue, but if you get a class where 25 are born June to August then the class is weighted around the younger children.

CosyMintFish · 15/08/2025 08:52

Late August born. Very similar to your position. We sent dc in to school, and there were some tricky patches at first, and the young ones are physically small and socially not up to speed with children who’ve spent a whole extra year growing.

By the end of KS1 we knew that we’d made the right decision not to defer, as it’s important that the children learn social skills and how to deal with school at the same time as their peers. Dc was still physically smaller and you could still see which children were summer born.

by the end of KS2 the differences had been ironed out. They were all similarly prepared for secondary whether they were nearly 11 or nearly 12.

Wr picked up his A Level results yesterday and he is going to Cambridge. Reception doesn’t seem long ago, but I can remember the accidents, the initial struggles getting his clothes the right way out after PE, joining in with some of the activities. Trust the school - a twelfth of the class will be August-born, and there will also be some premature children in the cohort. They know that the children arrive at different ages and stages and how to help them develop from where they are.

arethereanyleftatall · 15/08/2025 08:55

The benefits of deferring are front loaded.

I have teenagers who would be absolutely fuming if they still had to do alevels when their cohort were off on their gap year.

EmuFace · 15/08/2025 08:57

I would send her. Certainly in our area, she would be starting next September in Year 1, not Reception. Their language comes on in leaps and bounds in Reception.

Starlight7080 · 15/08/2025 09:08

This is tricky . I have 2 family members who's children are late August.
They didnt keep them back. And felt very positive about the decision till year 5 and 6 of primary school. Thats when obviously a lot of the play based learning has definitely stopped and it becomes a lot harder . They really struggled. And this has continued on into secondary school.
But then other who seem to have no problems.

Damnd · 15/08/2025 09:14

I wouldn't especially if academically ahead. This makes no sense, they will likely thrive at schoo and language skills will improve more so at school than nursery. There is one child that was held back in my child's year 3 class and he stands out as an older child and is actually a bit of a bully!

Userflower · 20/08/2025 19:16

I would defer reception completely until September 2026, I can assure you that you won’t regret it. It’s become so common to do so also

Userflower · 20/08/2025 19:18

Also on this matter the government did a study looking into it and found that summerborns never catch up with their autumn born peers, even at A levels. So if people tell you ‘it will all iron out’ statistically this is incorrect. It’s much better to defer summerborns

paulsimonsguitar · 20/08/2025 19:21

Another one to recommend deferring Reception until September 2026. As a mother to 2 summer babies and 2 winter ones, I wish the legislation had been around to defer the summer ones. Yes they’ve done ok academically and socially but I think they could have done better/been happier at various points if they hadn’t been the youngest.

Friends with younger ones who did defer the whole year are really pleased with their decision.

paulsimonsguitar · 20/08/2025 19:25

Also, in Scotland there is around a 3 month leeway in delaying children’s start date and a lot of people do use this. Officially the birth year runs 1st March to end of February but it’s not just the February children who defer. I knew plenty of December and January children who started a year late, even some November and October children too! Parents should be allowed to trust their instincts about their child’s school readiness.

suki1964 · 20/08/2025 19:29

From an Aug bank holiday baby - defer

i was never settled in school , i was the youngest by 11 months with some of the class. Not so bad in juniors but secondary, it bit me in the arse big time and I hated school.

I was 11 and a week when I started secondary. , the first birthdays were for 12 year olds. It may have been 10 years difference - socially and emotionally.

my wee sister was lucky that she got held a year in primary and had a great school experience

arethereanyleftatall · 20/08/2025 20:10

Userflower · 20/08/2025 19:18

Also on this matter the government did a study looking into it and found that summerborns never catch up with their autumn born peers, even at A levels. So if people tell you ‘it will all iron out’ statistically this is incorrect. It’s much better to defer summerborns

Sure, but there’s no data yet on the negatives of deferring. It’s only been in the past five years or so that deferring has been a thing. So we won’t know for about another decade how the kids themselves feel that they were ‘forced’, without their consent, to be held back a year. My gut feeling is that they won’t be happy. A year of their life ‘lost’.

Noelshighflyingturds · 20/08/2025 20:47

My eldest was so ready for school at 4, she was August 10th, not the youngest but definitely the smartest 😉

Swipe left for the next trending thread