… which is something else I don’t get. Labour have stated that they, on the whole, expect independent schools to find the money and absorb the cost of VAT for parents, by cutting back, in a new race to the bottom.
…but, isn’t this policy about raising funds for state schools?
so, if independent schools cut back, lower their fees and ‘absorb’ the costs, surely these lower fees now attract less VAT, raising much less money?
…whilst all at the same time, these charities now become more business minded, cutting back on community benefit projects and outreach, learning how to offset VAT too and maximise revenue. I.e. our independent school lets the two local primaries use the pool, twice a week, with instructors, for free - that will stop (cost for council). Our local indie, plus the local boys school lend mini buses to 2 local secondaries for the sport fixtures - that will stop (cost to council). Our school is already reviewing a decision to convert a huge disused residential building that was bought into a community hub with library, computers, science lab, etc. for local state nurseries and primaries - word on this street is that it will now become 4 flats!?!? And be rented out to supplement the bottom line.
This is all bonkers finance, unless I’ve missed something. The politics of the angry, jealous and shortsighted, I guess.
PS. In response to the OP - out school is going to do all the of the above to try and absorb some VAT for a short while.