Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

should creationism be on the science syllabus

179 replies

zippitippitoes · 10/03/2006 10:49

\link{http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2078747,00.html\ Interesting article}

OP posts:
Nightynight · 10/03/2006 16:34

lol mb, we'll all have to come out in support if you ever get into trouble for refusing to teach the syllabus...

bet you never thought about this particular moral dilemma when you went into teaching...Grin

Blandmum · 10/03/2006 16:37

I will padlock myself to the lab door! Grin

zippitippitoes · 10/03/2006 16:38

so mb would you teach it in the context of this exam board?

OP posts:
Bink · 10/03/2006 16:40

.. and, actually, to continue my thought, I wonder what Gosse's dad would have thought of the contemporary incarnation [word used advisedly] of his theory? Because despite his desperate need to justify literal Scripture, he was clearly a very gifted and conscientious (in the sense of not dreaming to twist facts) scientist. I wonder if he would be appalled too.

Blandmum · 10/03/2006 16:43

As a side step, we are not doing OCR next year and it isn't on the Edexcel sylabus.....do I don't have to chain myself to anything just yet Grin

I would be prepared to inform the children that there are people who belive in creationism. For example in year 9 we inform the children of other ideas about the organisation of the universe....that the ancient egyptions belived that the sky was the over arching body of a godess......we then go on to explain why this is wrong, and how modern cosmology is scientific, and makes prdictions that can be tested,

Hell would freeze over before I would teach 'Intellegent Design' as any form of science at all.

Kathy1972 · 10/03/2006 16:45

YOu need to explain why it is wrong??? ShockWink

Blandmum · 10/03/2006 16:46

Kathy Grin

One of my middle set class this year, an averagly intellegent 13-4 year old honesly thought that the sun went round the earth. She was also almost still thinking that the moon was made of cheese.....I shit you not!

Pruni · 10/03/2006 17:03

Just can't read this thread as it gets me so frustrated.

of course it shouldn't - it has nothing to do with science. It's a discussion for history of science classes - it deserves a passing mention - or RE classes.

Pruni · 10/03/2006 17:12

\link{http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/research/story/0,,1560047,00.html\This} is a good article on the reasons why creationism isn't the 'other side' of the debate - there isn't a debate, full stop.

niceglasses · 10/03/2006 17:14

Did anyone see the very scary program Richard Dawkins did about Creationism in America? I thought it was very good and very scary. I mean, where to they come from?

Blandmum · 10/03/2006 17:15

expecting to teach creationism is a science lesson is like expecting a german teacher to teach French in a german lesson, and tell the kids that it is actualy german.

SenoraPostrophe · 10/03/2006 17:17

why are people even asking this?

in RE or general studies, maybe. in science: no.

NB like morningpaper says, it might be an idea to have some ethics etc in science but creationism is not ethics. Just no!

fob · 10/03/2006 17:18

no.
this is not mid-west america. Smile

gomez · 10/03/2006 17:20

It is not a science - it is a set of beliefs do eh, no.

Pruni · 10/03/2006 17:21

I still can't read this thread.
The idea of teaching it as a theory in science is just so brain-pulverisingly stupid.

gomez · 10/03/2006 17:22

em - should be so, eh no as opposed to s short burst from the Sound of Music Blush

Kathy1972 · 10/03/2006 17:23

Pruni - top link.
I like the idea of teaching 'the stork theory' in sex education classes.

SenoraPostrophe · 10/03/2006 17:24

actually, to those who say creationism should be taught as part of a history of science: that's one of the scary things about it - I think I'm right in saying that it isn't old at all, it's a new theory dreamed up by religious nuts who don't know the meaning of allegory but who want to show that they are not the closed minded literalists of old.

I'd go and check that but am not in the mood for religious people today.

Pruni · 10/03/2006 17:51

But a history of science class would have to include lots of things that have happened or been mooted quite recently, wouldn't it?

Enid · 10/03/2006 17:55

"But you ever notice how people who believe in Creationism usually look pretty unevolved. Eyes really close together, big furry hands and feet? "I believe God created me in one day." Yeah, looks like he rushed it."

(sorry more Bill)

Blu · 10/03/2006 17:56

Aha - thank you MB - one of your posts below has explained why DS came back from the British Museum on Sunday all excited because a godess was making a bridge with her body from Brixton to Egypt....

Blandmum · 10/03/2006 17:56

\link{http://www.venganza.org/\very funny!}

Blandmum · 10/03/2006 17:57

I aim to please Blu! Grin

My day today has not been wasted then Grin

Pruni · 10/03/2006 17:57

MB we have a lot of spaghetti monster paraphenalia in this household...

Blandmum · 10/03/2006 18:00

Sigh, I really wish that Aloha had been here for this thread Sad

Swipe left for the next trending thread