Roxy: 'It also means attention to detail - e.g. "luxuriantly" doesn't mean the same thing as "luxuriously".'
Racka: 'RoxyNotFoxy - Oops! Where did I make that particular gaffe? That's embarrassing.'
'Amy had snuck into the rabbit run and was napping luxuriantly and peacefully amongst a huddle of new warm and cosy friends.'
Since you seem to be open to criticism, I'll try to encapsulate mine in some observations about the sentence I quoted. Because I'm aware that what I said in my last post is probably so vague as to be unusable. So, at the risk of telling you more than you ever wanted to know, I'll disembowel that sentence.
Your idea of a conspiracy of babies against mummies is a good one, but it must be consistent with what we see babies habitually doing. They can't act out of character. If your book is read by mummies, they must be able to say, "So that's what my baby is up to when she does that". You must turn babies' well-known characteristics into a weapon.
Every word counts. While "luxuriously" would be grammatically correct, it would be a stylistic failure, because it conjures up an image of someone taking up a lot of space, lying full-length with their hands behind their head. Babies curl up and merge with the landscape. "Snuck" is also the wrong word. It's something older children might do. Babies gurgle and crawl around with open intent. They go where they're not supposed to go, but they do it without any subterfuge. They know what they're doing of course - it's all part of the conspiracy - but it has the appearance of innocence. They're always wide-eyed. They're astonished when someone picks them up and puts them somewhere else. So my advice is: lose the "snuck". Amy clambered in amongst the rabbits and fell asleep as if it was her right. Somehow you have to convey that, but you have to do it with a turn of the wrist. You can't go on too long.
If I can borrow your word for a moment, your writing is often too luxuriant. It sprouts too many shoots. That sentence is one case, where you are firing off double-adverbs - "luxuriantly and peacefully" - and double-adjectives - "warm and cosy". This over-describing is an example of unsureness in the writing, which really stems from a lack of vividness. The excess of words only approximately achieves what you want - to evoke the image. Word-wise, the sentence is an expensive flop. Too many passenger-words.
I could pull out other examples from your blog and do the same with them, but I've probably over-used my critic's privilege as it is. So I'll shut up now.