Yes I am well aware men are victims too. This thread is about the litany of crappy sentences when women are the victims. According to the OP this thread is about light sentences for crime in Ireland.
You raised the Flynn case, and the cross-comparisons are interesting and depressing. 41 years to change things for the better, so little done.
At the time of the Flynn case there was no way to appeal the sentence. The process may be inadequate now - then it didn't exist.
I have no idea whether the judge in this case would have decided Crotty couldn't have know what he did would cause death. As I said, that was the claim in the Flynn case - despite two of the offenders being in the Defence Forces, so presumably well-informed on killing people and trained to do it - the army managed to avoid that by having him plead guilty. Have they learned how to cover their backsides, or anything more profound? They certainly don't seem to have learned to train their people not to attack defenseless Irish civilians.
Flynn was treated by the court as someone with no right to expect not to be assaulted. I noticed one person on Boards.ie saying that Natasha O'Brien provoked the attack on her by speaking to Crotty (no-one agreed with that) - I wonder would Crotty's lawyer have pursued that angle - poor fragile man shouldn't have to cope with female disapproval?
Then there's the whole character reference thing - again a factor in the Flynn case - it is only now, more than four decades later, that there's a suggestion that people giving them should be expected to stand up and be cross examined. Only a suggestion - it hasn't happened yet.
Yes, more women than men are victims of male violence, but many of the cowardly thugs will attack anyone who they think can't fight back, and the lack of adequate legal protection and redress affects everyone.