Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Covid

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Is anyone going for PCR next week as a precaution?

40 replies

goldenoldie1 · 18/12/2021 08:13

Given that lateral flows seem to be rubbish / unreliable in confirming positive cases, is anyone going to book PCR tests for their family this week as an extra precaution before mixing?

Yes yes I know you're not supposed to but taking an 'unnecessary' PCR is surely the lesser of two evils compared with Christmas mixing and potentially spreading it around further?

OP posts:
PatchworkElmer · 18/12/2021 09:07

No.

Lalalablahblahblah · 18/12/2021 09:11

This reply has been withdrawn

Message from MNHQ: This post has been withdrawn

MajorCarolDanvers · 18/12/2021 09:21

Please don't do this.

TableSetting · 18/12/2021 09:26

Agree - please don’t do this

MrsLargeEmbodied · 18/12/2021 09:29

later, before i see dm tomorrow
but fingers crossed negative and then no further testing.
hoping dd does not test before she comes home also

MrsLargeEmbodied · 18/12/2021 09:30

oh sorry, no not pcr,
just a lft later

Siuan · 18/12/2021 09:32

LFTs are very good at detecting when you are most infectious
twitter.com/michaelmina_lab/status/1441420493228236801

We will LFT on the day of visiting people.

Incidentally DH went for a PCR yesterday because he has a cough and was asked to trial a new lateral flow test as well. Presumably testing to compare accuarcy. Both negative thankfully.

LibbyL92 · 18/12/2021 09:47

My lateral flows have been actuate. 5 in a row showed I was positive.

I won’t be doing a PCR unless I’m showing symptoms and lateral flows tell me I’m positive.

Cattitudes · 18/12/2021 09:56

I think it will give you a false reassurance. It only tells you whether you had a sufficient viral load when you tested. You would probably need to test around 22nd to be fairly sure to get results back. In that time you could easily catch/ develop a substantial viral load by 25th. A LFT on the 25th will indicate whether you have it on that day. You could even buy some private ones and test part way through the day too if you wanted to be extra cautious.

ComDummings · 18/12/2021 09:58

I don’t think LFTs are that inaccurate are they? Mine picked up covid when I thought I had a head cold. What a waste of a PCR.

AD80 · 18/12/2021 09:59

Pointless imo unless you are isolating after getting the test and seeing family. You could get a test then catch covid immediately after.

In my experience a test could be negative one day and positive the next.

I have covid right now. I got a pcr test on Friday as Dp had it, pcr was negative. By Sunday I had a strong positive lft.

DrMaryMalone · 18/12/2021 10:09

As someone who works in testing, please do not do this. Testing slots need to be kept for those who are symptomatic or close contacts. The system is already very busy and unnecessary testing impacts test availability now, longer term stocks of kits and turn around times at the lab.

MilkBread · 18/12/2021 10:33

I’m pleased you’ve changed your mind OP. I would Take lateral flows regularly (as per Government guidance) and if there is any hint of a symptom go for the PCR.

If it helps, in our family we all tested positive on lateral flows. The only thing to note is that there was a time lag. So we had very mild symptoms in the morning but lateral flows were negative. Later that day they turned positive.

Hazelnutbean · 18/12/2021 11:39

@goldenoldie1

Given that lateral flows seem to be rubbish / unreliable in confirming positive cases, is anyone going to book PCR tests for their family this week as an extra precaution before mixing?

Yes yes I know you're not supposed to but taking an 'unnecessary' PCR is surely the lesser of two evils compared with Christmas mixing and potentially spreading it around further?

PCR tests are far from infallible... They are 'extremely' unlikely to give a false positive, which makes them different to LFTs (which are only 'very' unlikely to give a false positive) but false negatives are entirely possible.

www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n287/related

IgneousRock · 18/12/2021 11:41

LFTs have been accurate in my personal experience.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page