@ToffeeYoghurt
You say “...Reported as affecting the UK's most deprived areas. The top ten being London boroughs” and it raises a thought of mine that I’d love an opportunity to share if I may.
Deprivation rankings are relative to the neighbourhood or area so the cost of housing has a big impact. So the reason there are so many areas in London at the top of the deprivation rankings is simply because the cost of owning a home is so high in London.
People in deprived areas in London may have better stats in terms of access to income, employment, education, healthcare, living environment etc as a deprived family in Hull, for example, but on the deprivation rankings the Londoners will appear as more deprived because property prices in London are so out of reach for them.
A woman I know collecting books for a school the other day circulated an email saying “despite being next to Regent’s Park it is one of the most deprived schools in the county.” Duh! It is precisely because it is next to to Regent’s Park and because homes in and around the park are so expensive (those on Avenue Road cost £25 million plus) that it is one of the most deprived. I’ve wanted to get this off my chest since.
I guess my point is that when you point the finger at London and say “look how deprived it is” you’re really saying “look how many rich people with expensive houses live within a few blocks of council housing.” It doesn’t mean that people are universally worse off in those areas than people in deprived areas lower down in the rankings and in fact I’d bet their access to income and employment is better than other cities in the UK.