So if the key worker earns less than the none key worker parent, and the only way they can still go to work is by taking up a childcare place, is this unreasonable? The none key worker can’t work from home this isn’t an option. If they don’t go in they don’t get paid.
The other option is the key worker doesnt go to work at all. And the frontline lose a member of staff. But the family will still pay the bills As the non key worker earns enough to sustain them, key worker doesnt.
I’m seeing lots of opinions that it is selfish to take up the childcare place unless both parents are key workers.
But just wondering what people would think of this situation.
Would you honestly expect a family not to be able to pay their bills, so the key worker could go out to work. And the none key worker stay at home unpaid to look after the children.
What is the lesser evil?