But isn't the idea that keeping them in school and exposing them to it now makes them less 6if a risk to the most vulnerable (elderly, or people with compromised immune systems, I including other children) after the isolation period of those groups has ended. A period which by all accounts points to being imminent?
We're comfortable with the herd immunity theory when it comes to vaccines, why not when nature taking its course is the hypothetical vaccine for those that cant expose themselves in the same way?
Some might say that by not isolating, as an otherwise fit and well person with no symptoms at present, is a selfish act, and makes you a danger to society when those that have self isolated due to compromised immune systems are no longer in isolation!
It sounds terrifying, but we do know the data of the deaths even if we don't know the data of the carriers. That tells us with about as much certainty that there is at the moment, if you're under 40 years old you have 0.3 pct chance of dying, and without pre existing medical conditions, that chance is basically 0.0000001 pct.
Those that are otherwise fit and well need to listen to the scientists advice regarding herd immunity and think of the most vulnerable.
We can't change the UK's directive at this point, so we need to make sure we're not working against what the vast majority of others will be doing, and endangering others, not us.