@SunnyAfternoonToday
Self determination is a really complex thing though. In the UK it is not based on ethnicity or religion, but geographical boundaries, mostly set by history.
Para 2 of the UN charter :
"To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;"
Self determination is a conditional right surely ? And in the context of the UN charter it really means political self determination. The people, as a collective, get to democratically elect a government with the politics they want. In the UK everyone with a vote has an equal part in the election of what government they determine that want. That is the right. The right is not for Jews or Christians or Muslims to have the exact government they want, because demographics.
Self determination along ethnic or religious lines is really problematic, because it can potentially infringe on so many rights of others.
I think with Israel, and happy to be corrected, it was nominally a Jewish state, but officially not. It was secular. Then in 2019, Netanyahu said :
"Israel “is the national state, not of all its citizens, but only of the Jewish people.”
Netanyahu: Israel is the state of 'Jewish people alone' | AP News
At that point, I think it could be argued that self determination was thrown out the window, because he was deciding to define it in a different way than the UN Charter intended it to mean.