Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

BBC forced to correct two Gaza stories a week

119 replies

Twiglets1 · 09/11/2025 14:34

The BBC has been forced to correct two stories a week about the Gaza conflict since the Oct 7 attacks on Israel, The Telegraph has revealed.

BBC Arabic has had to make 215 corrections and clarifications over the past two years on stories that were found to be biased, inaccurate or misleading.

The figures follow a week of revelations by The Telegraph of one-sided reporting at the BBC, disclosed in an 8,000-word dossier compiled by a whistleblower, which also accused BBC Arabic of choosing to “minimise Israeli suffering” in the war in Gaza to “paint Israel as the aggressor”.

On Monday, the BBC is also expected to apologise for the misleading editing of a Donald Trump speech in a Panorama documentary, putting further pressure on Tim Davie, the BBC’s director general, to quit.

The media bias campaign group Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (Camera) obtained the corrections after over 100 of its complaints over BBC Arabic’s coverage were upheld.

One of its complaints involved a BBC Arabic report in January this year about the treatment of hostages by the Al-Qassam Brigade, in which the Hamas unit was described as “guarding” the hostages and being “responsible for securing the hostages”, rather than holding them captive.

BBC Arabic – which is part of the World Service and is funded mainly through the licence fee – has also been forced to make more than 40 corrections after Camera complained about stories that incorrectly referred to communities inside Israel’s internationally recognised territory as “settlements” and their residents as “settlers”.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11/09/bbc-forced-to-correct-two-gaza-stories-a-week/

OP posts:
SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/11/2025 07:58

I would be interested in a break down of the corrections and changes because the corrections to me seem to have been more about passing on misinformation that came from both sides of the conflict and then correcting it.

Caused primarily, imho, by Israel’s refusal to allow in independent journalists, and secondly because it was a conflict zone and initial information can be updated as more facts become available.

The number of corrections by themselves don’t prove antiIsrael bias when we don’t know the details or the circumstances of them.

We do know that dozens of British BBC journalists protested what they saw as proIsrael bias where Israeli reports were published unquestioned that later proved to be incorrect. Cases like Hind Rijab and the 8 emergency workers massacred come to mind where as Israel’s misreporting was uncovered, BBC had to go back and correct stories they had published.

So, it certainly wasn’t all one way.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/11/2025 08:01

Twiglets1 · 10/11/2025 13:42

It's somewhat surprising that anyone would try to spin BBC Arabic being forced to correct hundreds of "mistakes" (all in Hamas's favour) to say this "shows their impartiality" but this is why I don't engage with you much.

The "internal whistleblowing memo" had been sent to the BBC's editorial standards board.

It was written by Michael Prescott, a former journalist who until June 2025 was an independent adviser to the BBC’s Editorial Guidelines and Standards Board (EGSB). It did not seem as though the BBC was going to taken much action against the allegations of bias, until the dossier was leaked to the Telegraph who published it in full.

Where is it proven all the mistakes were in Hamas favour?

Twiglets1 · 18/11/2025 08:07

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/11/2025 08:01

Where is it proven all the mistakes were in Hamas favour?

All the ones I have seen have been in Hamas favour.

If you have seen any mistakes that BBC Arabic posted in Israel's favour then feel free to raise them.

OP posts:
SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/11/2025 08:12

Twiglets1 · 18/11/2025 08:07

All the ones I have seen have been in Hamas favour.

If you have seen any mistakes that BBC Arabic posted in Israel's favour then feel free to raise them.

How many have you seen?

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/11/2025 08:19

In a war where no independent journalists are allowed to go, there is going to be a tonne of misinformation that ends up being corrected.

The BBC has also this year been the subject of 13 internal whistleblowers alleging proIsrael bias.

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/bbc-impartiality-trust-israel-gaza-media-experts/

and this report
https://cfmm.org.uk/bbc-on-gaza-israel-one-story-double-standards/

Twiglets1 · 18/11/2025 08:23

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/11/2025 08:12

How many have you seen?

I've already given examples on this thread

In a copy of the letter, which was last week published by The Telegraph, he said that BBC Arabic gave a platform to journalists who had made extreme anti-Semitic comments.
Among the examples of bias highlighted by both Camera and Mr Prescott were the differences in stories about an attack by Hamas on Oct 1 2024 that killed seven Israeli civilians in Jaffa.
While the BBC News English version reported how the civilians were killed on a train and railway platform, the BBC Arabic version presented the attack as a military operation with no mention of the civilian victims.
Another BBC Arabic report in January this year described the Al-Qassam Brigade as “guarding” the hostages and as being “responsible for securing the hostages”, rather than holding them captive.
It also featured two female Israeli hostages “thanking” their captors for the “good treatment” they received while “in custody”.
Following a complaint from Camera that the video omitted the “horrific reality of the torture and execution of hostages”, BBC Arabic was forced to amend its story.
It removed the section that claimed the hostages had received good treatment and added a brief reference to Hamas abuse.

As I said before, if you have seen any mistakes that BBC Arabic posted in Israel's favour then feel free to raise them.

OP posts:
SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/11/2025 08:30

Twiglets1 · 18/11/2025 08:23

I've already given examples on this thread

In a copy of the letter, which was last week published by The Telegraph, he said that BBC Arabic gave a platform to journalists who had made extreme anti-Semitic comments.
Among the examples of bias highlighted by both Camera and Mr Prescott were the differences in stories about an attack by Hamas on Oct 1 2024 that killed seven Israeli civilians in Jaffa.
While the BBC News English version reported how the civilians were killed on a train and railway platform, the BBC Arabic version presented the attack as a military operation with no mention of the civilian victims.
Another BBC Arabic report in January this year described the Al-Qassam Brigade as “guarding” the hostages and as being “responsible for securing the hostages”, rather than holding them captive.
It also featured two female Israeli hostages “thanking” their captors for the “good treatment” they received while “in custody”.
Following a complaint from Camera that the video omitted the “horrific reality of the torture and execution of hostages”, BBC Arabic was forced to amend its story.
It removed the section that claimed the hostages had received good treatment and added a brief reference to Hamas abuse.

As I said before, if you have seen any mistakes that BBC Arabic posted in Israel's favour then feel free to raise them.

I have also posted examples where I know multiple corrections happened.

But us listing a handful of examples out of what is reported as 215, isn’t going to prove bias towards one side or another.

Are you not at all interested in seeing the full list instead of a cherry picked handful?

Twiglets1 · 18/11/2025 08:38

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/11/2025 08:30

I have also posted examples where I know multiple corrections happened.

But us listing a handful of examples out of what is reported as 215, isn’t going to prove bias towards one side or another.

Are you not at all interested in seeing the full list instead of a cherry picked handful?

I must have missed your specific examples of where BBC Arabic posted in Israel's favour so please repost them as I did above if they exist.

OP posts:
SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/11/2025 08:46

Twiglets1 · 18/11/2025 08:38

I must have missed your specific examples of where BBC Arabic posted in Israel's favour so please repost them as I did above if they exist.

Cases like Hind Rijab and the 8 emergency workers massacred come to mind where as Israel’s misreporting was uncovered, BBC had to go back and correct stories they had published.

Here you go. Now the 215 corrections were mistakes of inaccuracy, bias or being misleading. How many of the 215 were purely inaccuracies caused by a war zone with no independent reporting allowed? This is actually to be expected and shouldn’t have been included in the total as it is part and parcel of the news to update developing stories as more information becomes available.

How many were judged to be corrected due to bias or being misleading? And in whose favour had they been written in originally?

And are any of the above due to an inadvertent mistranslation between English and Arabic?

Somehow I don’t think the 19 page internal memo written by one BBC journalist actually does drill down into these factors. And how does his opinion balance against the other BBC journalists who allege the opposite?

Twiglets1 · 18/11/2025 08:52

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/11/2025 08:46

Cases like Hind Rijab and the 8 emergency workers massacred come to mind where as Israel’s misreporting was uncovered, BBC had to go back and correct stories they had published.

Here you go. Now the 215 corrections were mistakes of inaccuracy, bias or being misleading. How many of the 215 were purely inaccuracies caused by a war zone with no independent reporting allowed? This is actually to be expected and shouldn’t have been included in the total as it is part and parcel of the news to update developing stories as more information becomes available.

How many were judged to be corrected due to bias or being misleading? And in whose favour had they been written in originally?

And are any of the above due to an inadvertent mistranslation between English and Arabic?

Somehow I don’t think the 19 page internal memo written by one BBC journalist actually does drill down into these factors. And how does his opinion balance against the other BBC journalists who allege the opposite?

That's just another criticism of Israel not an example of BBC Arabic posting in Israel's favour.

Forget it - we both know such examples do not exist.

OP posts:
Hiptothisjive · 18/11/2025 09:07

spoonbillstretford · 09/11/2025 19:03

I just wish there was this much scrutiny for all media channels and newspapers. Meanwhile the Daily Mail, Fox News and GBeebies talk absolute lies, fear and shite every day with zero scrutiny and people here swallow it whole.

Totally true. I guess the difference for me is that Fox News for example isn’t supposed to be impartial and isn’t paid for by the taxpayer (directly). Everyone knows it’s biased and it doesn’t try to pretend otherwise.

I think the days of the BBC are over. It isn’t fit for purpose, isnt world leading and doesnt adhere to its own principles.

Twiglets1 · 22/11/2025 19:45

Telegraph article today: BBC headlines ‘three times as likely to vilify Israel over Hamas’

A study of BBC headlines since the Oct 7 attacks has found three times more were critical of Israel than of Hamas.

According to research by a media monitoring group, references to Hamas committing possible war crimes appeared once in the broadcaster’s coverage, while those featuring claims of Israeli genocide, famine and starvation appeared 45 times.

The study of BBC News UK headlines used since the terror group’s attacks on Israel in 2023, which triggered the war in Gaza, found that 11 per cent were critical of Hamas, while more than a third (35 per cent) appeared to be critical of Israel.

The study by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (Camera) will heap further pressure on the BBC over the fairness and objectivity of its reporting of the war.

The figures follow weeks of revelations by The Telegraph of one-sided reporting at the BBC, disclosed in an 8,000-word dossier compiled by Michael Prescott, a former standards adviser for the corporation.

Critics say that the BBC’s coverage of the conflict has helped fuel anti-Semitism and contributed to Jewish people in the UK feeling less safe.

Hadar Sela, of Camera UK, said: “For two years, BBC News headlines have displayed an almost naive acceptance of any claim made by Hamas, while treating statements made by Israel with the utmost scepticism. Such blatant bias has helped fuel a surge in anti-Semitism within the UK and turned Britain into a hostile environment for the Jewish community.”

The study examined all 2,542 headlines about the Gaza conflict published on BBC News UK between Oct 7, 2023 and Oct 7, 2025. It found that just one focused on a spate of brutal public executions by Hamas, while 33 headlines in two months carried claims that Israeli forces killed civilians as they sought food from Gaza aid sites.

Camera claims that Israel has been repeatedly accused by the BBC of using aid as a weapon of war, with the word “starving” or “starvation” appearing 21 times in headlines, the word “famine” 10 times and “war crimes” six. The words “genocide” or “genocidal” appeared in headlines 14 times.

The study found that Hamas fighters were referred to in headlines as “militants” and “gunmen” rather than terrorists. Camera found only one headline referring to “war crimes” by Hamas and just six about the rape and sexual violence carried out by its fighters on Oct 7 and against captured hostages.

It found that although there was widespread condemnation of the way Hamas staged the release of hostages, many of whom were severely malnourished, the BBC appeared to downplay the outrage.

There was just one reference in a headline to a “carefully staged handover” and one to the hostages appearing “gaunt”.

Camera claims this tone was also reflected in the BBC’s coverage of the original Oct 7 atrocities, which killed more than 1,200 people, with an absence of emotive language and an emphasis on Israel’s likely “retaliation” in its headlines.

Camera also accused the BBC of downplaying the false claims about the return of the body of the kidnapped Israeli mother Shiri Bibas, and the confirmation that her young children had been murdered and their bodies mutilated.

The broadcaster used an understated rather than emotive headline on the story by stating “Hamas failure to return body is new ceasefire setback” and “Israel says forensics show Bibas children killed by captors”.

Danny Cohen, the former Director of BBC Television, said: “These statistics are shocking but also unsurprising when you consider the influence of BBC Arabic, the BBC’s most toxic open secret.

“No other newsroom in Britain would tolerate this. Yet the BBC consistently denies BBC Arabic has a systemic problem and the channel continues to be relied upon as a news-gathering service for the wider BBC".

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11/22/bbc-israel-hamas-bias-research/

OP posts:
Everexpanding · 22/11/2025 20:09

Maybe easier for the bbc to report on Gaza if they could actually get access, maybe Israel should actually let journalists in

wrongthinker · 22/11/2025 20:17

Crazy, isn't it. The BBC are completely ideologically captured.

In related news, I saw a story saying X turned on location data which revealed all these 'Palestinian' activists/sob stories that are trying to get donations and support for their terrible plight are actually in London, Canada etc and just cosplaying and grifting. Scumbags.

Twiglets1 · 22/11/2025 20:27

Everexpanding · 22/11/2025 20:09

Maybe easier for the bbc to report on Gaza if they could actually get access, maybe Israel should actually let journalists in

BBC Arabic has freelance journalists in Gaza. They give a platform to journalists who have made extreme anti-Semitic comments, such as Samar Elzaenen. He has appeared on BBC Arabic more than a dozen times since the October 7 Hamas attacks when he referred to the Hamas terrorists as "resistance fighters”.

An investigation by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (Camera) into Elzaenen’s social media revealed that the freelance journalist repeatedly featured by the corporation has posted extremist slogans including “#WeAreAllHamas You Son of a Jewess”. In July 2022, a post on his Facebook read: “When things go awry for us, shoot the Jews, it fixes everything,” the Telegraph reported.

He made a similar statement in May 2011, when he allegedly wrote on Facebook, “My message to the Zionist Jews: We are going to take our land back, we love death for Allah’s sake the same way you love life. We shall burn you as Hitler did, but this time we won’t have a single one of you left.”

www.thejc.com/news/uk/bbc-arabic-journalist-posted-we-are-all-hamas-and-shoot-the-jews-thw47sa6

OP posts:
Twiglets1 · 22/11/2025 20:29

wrongthinker · 22/11/2025 20:17

Crazy, isn't it. The BBC are completely ideologically captured.

In related news, I saw a story saying X turned on location data which revealed all these 'Palestinian' activists/sob stories that are trying to get donations and support for their terrible plight are actually in London, Canada etc and just cosplaying and grifting. Scumbags.

It's all coming out now.

OP posts:
TooTightDiamondShoesDoingMyHeadIn · 22/11/2025 22:48

Twiglets1 · 22/11/2025 20:27

BBC Arabic has freelance journalists in Gaza. They give a platform to journalists who have made extreme anti-Semitic comments, such as Samar Elzaenen. He has appeared on BBC Arabic more than a dozen times since the October 7 Hamas attacks when he referred to the Hamas terrorists as "resistance fighters”.

An investigation by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (Camera) into Elzaenen’s social media revealed that the freelance journalist repeatedly featured by the corporation has posted extremist slogans including “#WeAreAllHamas You Son of a Jewess”. In July 2022, a post on his Facebook read: “When things go awry for us, shoot the Jews, it fixes everything,” the Telegraph reported.

He made a similar statement in May 2011, when he allegedly wrote on Facebook, “My message to the Zionist Jews: We are going to take our land back, we love death for Allah’s sake the same way you love life. We shall burn you as Hitler did, but this time we won’t have a single one of you left.”

www.thejc.com/news/uk/bbc-arabic-journalist-posted-we-are-all-hamas-and-shoot-the-jews-thw47sa6

Not as if this paragon of globally respected non partisan and impartial journalism could have been expected to vett the journalists it chose to platform and broadcast, and pay taxpayers money to, could it?

A simple check of their SM posts would have been enough.

Twiglets1 · 23/11/2025 06:16

TooTightDiamondShoesDoingMyHeadIn · 22/11/2025 22:48

Not as if this paragon of globally respected non partisan and impartial journalism could have been expected to vett the journalists it chose to platform and broadcast, and pay taxpayers money to, could it?

A simple check of their SM posts would have been enough.

Yes … I used to work in a school where we were told to be very careful what we put on social media. It could be a sackable offence if anything was discovered that contradicted the school values- racist for example. Wonder if the BBC had the same policy towards their journalists social media? If so, some of them need to be sacked.

Then again, maybe being paid on a freelance basis meant they could get away with a lot more. You would still think the BBC would do a basic search of what their “journalists” were saying on social media, especially in such a sensitive place as Gaza. But it appears not 🤷🏼‍♀️

OP posts:
Twiglets1 · 21/12/2025 11:26

BBC corrects article that ignored Hamas’s anti-Semitism

The BBC has admitted it risked misleading the public by failing to acknowledge that Hamas was an anti-Semitic group with the stated aim of targeting Jews.

The broadcaster has amended a four-year-old BBC Arabic online article about the terror group to include references to its founding principles being based on a hatred of Jews.

The article was only changed following a complaint by a pro-Israel media monitoring group.

The BBC was previously forced to change a report in which it describes the Palestinian intifada uprisings, in which thousands died on both sides, as “largely unarmed and popular”.

Following a series of complaints by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (CAMERA), the BBC has this month extensively amended the BBC Arabic article about the origins of Hamas, originally published in 2021.

The broadcaster has now added to the article an explanation that Hamas’s founding principles included anti-Semitism.

The original version of the BBC Arabic article acknowledged that Hamas was seeking the destruction of the state of Israel, but failed to make explicit the anti-Semitic philosophy at the root of this aim – suggesting only that some critics accused it of Jew hate.

The article stated: “[Hamas’] charter thus stipulated that ‘historic Palestine, including present-day Israel, is a land for Muslims’, and called for the destruction of the State of Israel. This position was among the reasons which led some [people] to accuse it of anti-Semitism early on.”

The BBC’s Executive Complaints Unit (ECU) has said that on its own this could lead to a “risk audiences might be misled on a material point”.

As a result, BBC Arabic has now added to the text an additional explanation, stating: “The 1988 [Hamas] charter equates between Judaism as a religion and the Zionist movement, emphasising that the heart of the conflict is religious, with the Jews as a whole.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/12/20/bbc-corrects-article-that-failed-to-call-hamas-anti-semitic/

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page