I've written a letter to my consultant, which I will hand to her, as I'm not as good expressing myself sometimes as I am on paper. The background, for those that don't know, is Tink was born at 31 weeks, because she was coming fast and feet first I had to have a crash section. They didn't allow themselves enough space to get her out and gave me an inverse T shaped scar. I've been told I can't VBAC - no discussion - and that worries me because I suffered Birth Trauma last time and don't want to go there again.
"I wrote this down because sometimes I?m not as good at expressing myself verbally as I can on paper.
I was told after my last section that it was a good thing I had a general because my back wouldn?t have coped with an epidural. My back isn?t better than it was then; if anything it?s worse. Every time I?ve tried to discuss it with a doctor I get told ?we?ll bring you in a few days before the section and stop your Clexane? but the Clexane isn?t the only concern.
I was reading the RCOG guidelines on caesarean section and it says that the risk of rupture with my type of scar is 19 in 10,000 or 1.9%. It also says that only 74% of attempted VBAC are actually successful.
The way I see it if I have a section I can either risk further damage to my back with an epidural ? I?ve been told that my back is past physio now and needs to be dealt with by a specialist ? or have a general which I really wish to avoid as I think it was a big part of my Birth Trauma last time. Or I VBAC with the possibility that I have another crash section with a general, which would be the same outcome as if I hadn?t tried.
I think that looking at the statistics a VBAC with my scar and the success rate of VBAC that I would like to try for one. I managed both my previous labours without pain relief and my false starts with this one I?ve done without, I am happy to keep pain relief to a minimum so as not to disguise any breakthrough pain and I don?t plan on being a hero, if at anytime I feel something is wrong I will be happy to say."