maxbear, would they have to consider that. Really? No wonder many women would prefer to avoid the healthcare establishment entirely!
That a womans choice to avoid medical intervention, more specifically, medicalisation of a natural process might lead to queries regarding child protection issues strikes me as completely absurd. Particularly given that many women prefer to birth at home with the (supported) belief that homebirth is generally safer and less traumatic for both mother and baby!
I know of freebirthers and know more women who have homebirthed who have enjoyed natural, healthy births and babies than I do women who have birthed in a hospital..... in fact I know not of one woman who has enjoyed birth to it's fullest potential when under the care of a hospital. Trauma, judgement, coersion, misinformation, lack of support, threats, failure to progress, pain, PTSD, extreme and overt and unnecessary continual monitoring, PND, callous obstructitions, and fear seem to be the common outcome, particularly of first time births, inclusive of my one hospital birth FWIW.
...and avoiding all that potential negativity would be perceived as a child protection issue?!
Hmmmmmmm.
asur, I homebirth rather than freebirth because of some of the issues mentioned in previous posts regarding resources. If at the last moment, I wished for a midwife, in a freebirth situation it could deplete a hospital resource, plus I could end up with para's who would definitely be absolute strangers. Community spirit I suppose, share resources to the best potential where possible . Luckily, my midwife is a like minded individual who I'd invite to my birth were I freebirthing anyway!