Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Childbirth

Share experiences and get support around labour, birth and recovery.

Considering maternal request c section for large baby

57 replies

CoralFz · 01/07/2023 07:05

I am currently 38+3 weeks and the other day I had a growth scan. I was told baby is already estimated 8lb5 and could be around the 9lb5 mark at due date. Having a large baby hadn't occurred to me before then and I was fully prepared for VB. I know hes not as big as he could be and people have birthed bigger naturally. I'm also 5ft7 and perhaps that's why they didn't seem overly concerned too.

However, after the scan I spoke to a doctor. Male, older, quite blunt and not at all reassuring. He went through the risks of LGA babys and VB telling me about increased risk of a heavy bleed, more of a liklihood of instrumental delivery, baby getting stuck, tears that extend the all the way to the back passage etc etc. In all honesty he scared me completely. Obviously these are always the risks with VB but to be told two weeks before due date that these things are now more likely has sent me into anxiety over drive.

He has booked me in for another scan when I am 40 + 1 weeks and it just wasn't sitting right with me. I kept thinking but if I go into labour on or just before my due date and he's as big or bigger than they're estimating I've had no time to consider other options.

I spoke to my midwife yesterday and she was very understanding. She reassured me that growth scans aren't always accurate and that the margin of error could be around 20% either way. (Although in my head that could be a margin of error that he's actually 20% heavier than they estimated too!)

She asked me what I would feel more comfortable with in terms of perhaps induction or c section. I am quite against induction specially at this point as I know it can sometimes be a long drawn out and more painful process than spontaneous labour. Even taking days or upto a week to give birth, and that would ultimately take me to my due date anyway.

I asked if perhaps I could have elective csection booked 1 week before my due date. Giving baby a chance to arrive sooner by VB around his current size and the csection be there as a back up so I don't go any further. She assured me this should be fine. Though I got quite upset as I know there is some stigma around mrcs and I feel some kind of shame around asking and that I may be judged. She was lovely, told me it's my body and that it's not uncommon for ladies to elect for csection with larger babies.

I now have another consultation booked for a couple of days time to discuss this all (purposefully with a different doctor to the one who scared me). But I'm still struggling with that feeling of am I doing the right thing?

I've spoken to my partner and parents and a friend and they have all been supportive and say that if a csection allows baby to be delivered safely without getting stuck without trauma and I'm avoiding all the risks mentioned then it is fine to take this route. That if I went ahead with VB and something did happen I would kick myself for not following my gut. I just wish there wasn't this guilt feeling, even though I'm fully aware a csection is in no way an easy way out either.

OP posts:
Mooselooseinmyhoose · 08/05/2025 17:24

Perfectweatherforducks · 01/07/2023 07:54

Just to give a positive story, i had a natural birth with an 11lber who's head was 99th centile. I tore but I also tore with my 8lb8 baby. It was a far easier labour with the bigger baby.

Absolutely this. My youngest was VB 11lb 8!

OP do what is right by you but remember the people who suffer the most trauma understandably and the people who talk about it most. There are plenty of positive large baby birth stories as well as the growth scans being off stories. All that matters is what you want to do.

Strawberriesforever · 28/05/2025 22:59

9lbs 5 baby here and I’m 5’5. Straightforward VB following induction for going overdue. No damage to me. I did need a few stitches 5but everything healed up quickly and no ongoing issues whatsoever. Big babies don’t always mean difficult births.

IkeaMeatballGravy · 28/05/2025 23:13

There was recently a big baby study, less than 50% of the women whose scans predicted a big baby actually had a big baby. They are wildly innacurate so I would be wary of undergoing major abdominal surgery based on a growth scan.

PawsAndTails · 28/05/2025 23:35

Your body, your choice, so it's about what you feel best with.

I do know plenty of women who have delivered babies over 9 lb, including very small women, mostly at home, without problem. The position of the baby and position of birthing can be more important than the size.

IndiganDop · 28/05/2025 23:35

Mooselooseinmyhoose · 08/05/2025 17:24

Absolutely this. My youngest was VB 11lb 8!

OP do what is right by you but remember the people who suffer the most trauma understandably and the people who talk about it most. There are plenty of positive large baby birth stories as well as the growth scans being off stories. All that matters is what you want to do.

The OP was pregnant in July 23 so I am hazarding a guess that the situation has moved on and the baby has arrived by now....

PawsAndTails · 28/05/2025 23:37

IndiganDop · 28/05/2025 23:35

The OP was pregnant in July 23 so I am hazarding a guess that the situation has moved on and the baby has arrived by now....

Either that or the baby is truly big and a c-section is definitely advised at this point.

merderforlife · 30/05/2025 12:12

I'm 5'7" both my babies were over 9lb and absolutely fine deliveries, one with epidural one with just Gas & air. I think the recent trend of estimating babies weights is making people choose CS they don't need!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread