My first - I was in labour from Monday teatime, but very slow. Went from midwife-led birthing centre to delivery suite with drugs, epidural etc. C-section for 'failure to progress' at Weds lunchtime. The midwife explained that she saw in the operating theatre that DD's head was wodged in my pelvis at an angle, she could not come out like that.
I did feel mixed up about it and we had feeding problems that might have been from drugs/exhaustion/DD having her neck crunched by contractions for a long time.
My second - decided to go for VBAC, about 8 hours of contractions building, he was born within a few hours of arriving at hospital, was 9lb5 and I needed an episiotomy and no time for epidural.
The actual birth bit of VBAC was extremely painful but overall I preferred it by far as an experience, once he was out I felt fine and could move around whereas with CS I felt like I'd been hit by a truck. I had logically accepted that CS hadn't been my fault but I did find it psychologically healing somehow to give birth vaginally. I was surprised by the relief.
In the old days, a birth like I had with DD would have just gone on until she or I both got exhausted and died.
There are pros and cons to both CS and VB, you're not guaranteed a smooth ride in either case. I think it's like having a train ticket - some people get a beautiful view of the mountains, some people get farted on and sat next to someone eating junk food, some people have a train replacement bus that takes six hours. So long as you get to the end destination, that's all that matters.
Anyone who makes out CS is the easy way out obviously hasn'thad their abdomen cut open in a room full of strangers then experienced major surgery recovery while caring for a newborn!